My guess is that the OP who posted this probably comes from upper middle class and graduated from a good university. Expectations are different for those types of people.One 小吃 cost 68RMB?
what kind of bourgeois bullshit is this?
My guess is that the OP who posted this probably comes from upper middle class and graduated from a good university. Expectations are different for those types of people.One 小吃 cost 68RMB?
what kind of bourgeois bullshit is this?
More likely green frog net army trying to stir up shit, again.My guess is that the OP who posted this probably comes from upper middle class and graduated from a good university. Expectations are different for those types of people.
Hiring situation on rebel province is even worse for people not involved with semiconductor.More likely green frog net army trying to stir up shit, again.
The policy is poised to enmesh Xinjiang and Tibet not only deeper into China’s economy and mainstream culture but also into global supply chains. It could also help the People’s Liberation Army bolster China’s security along its borders with India, Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of central Asia. If Beijing is successful in integrating the regions and their people with China’s mainstream economy and population, that could over time make it more difficult for western governments to use sanctions or boycotts as an effective response to repression.
Xinjiang received a record 323mn tourists last year, compared to around 210mn before the pandemic, while Tibet saw about 70mn, a similarly sharp increase from 40mn in 2019. By comparison, outbound tourism remained broadly in line with pre-pandemic levels at about 168mn last year. The potential windfall from the tourism market has not been ignored by hotel groups, Chinese and foreign. As of April, at least 163 hotels from major international hotel chains were operating in Xinjiang, including Accor, Hilton, IHG, Marriott and Wyndham, according to research by the Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP), an NGO. A record 40 hotels opened in 2025, twice as many as any previous year. The group said international operators were “dramatically expanding” in the region, with a further 52 properties under construction or in planning — which would take the total above 200.
Eastern provincial governments are encouraged to run industrial parks in the west with deep tax incentives for transferring coastal industrial bases to inland cities — a policy that tries to combat coastal provinces having little incentive to support the west. Connectivity to and from western China has also been dramatically bolstered by a series of multi-billion-dollar transport megaprojects threaded throughout the region, including highways, tunnels, bridges and high-speed rail.
The deals highlight that, along with tourism spending, a big chunk of the economic growth is coming from investments by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and companies from China’s more affluent east — akin to a nation receiving foreign direct investment. Over recent months Chinese state media reported robust medium-term growth figures for both Xinjiang and Tibet. Average annual growth rates in 2025, on a regional GDP basis, were 5.5 per cent and 7 per cent, respectively, outperforming the rest of the economy.
Zubayra Shamseden, co-executive director at the Network for Uyghur Rights in Washington DC, says the central government’s policies to promote tourism in Xinjiang, as well as some relaxation of rules blocking many Uyghur people from leaving the region, are part of a familiar pattern from Beijing. “I wouldn’t say it is confidence on the part of the Chinese government: It is a historic cycle [of] strong repression, then the crackdown, then they start again to focus on economic development,” she says.
I am guessing they predict India to be number 1?China to surpass the USA around 2035 by the size of economy. China to remain first through 2050s, but it will slide to second by 2075 due to an aging society.
Is already bigger economy in terms of total output.China to surpass the USA around 2035 by the size of economy. China to remain first through 2050s, but it will slide to second by 2075 due to an aging society.
That's ppp not nominal. GDP ppp measures domestic purchasing power while nominal measures International purchasing power. 2 different concepts. China needs to surpass the USA in the nominal GDP to be seen as truly the largest economy.Is already bigger economy in terms of total output.
China: 44,295,453 millions
US: 32,383,920 millions