Equation
Lieutenant General
Trump: "HOLD MY BUD LIGHT BEER!"
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
more in depth analysis on the World Liberty Financial shitcoi pump n dump. The Trump family are this eras Borgias with Donroe acting as the corrupt pope Leo and Barron as cesare.
They can always block everyone's oil except Chinese, just like they tariffed everyone who trade with Iran and Russia except China
But it's also moot regardless because China has rail link to Iran.
supercat
Colonel
The stage is set for further confrontation.
Lol ok.
Last edited:
So what was your grandpa doing in China during WW2, infamous Netto-uyoku?
And what a banger of a reply (which I agree):
And what a banger of a reply (which I agree):
Last edited:
Mental illness. They're currently getting de facto (and soon to be actually) blockaded by the US from getting oil and they make a big show of "preparing" for a potential future blockade from the motherland? This needs to be classified in DSM-5, for real.
All the Chinese investments in Hungary looks unwise all of a sudden. None of the EU countries are worth investing
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Probably better here than the Iran strategy thread:
Well, it's obvious to everyone so I didn't consider it name-calling because what other than an imbecile thinks that the higher the military spending the better, and 30% is boss level? And it's not like imbeciles can really learn so it was really for other people to read anyway.
Uh huh. I like North Korea, but North Korea would not be a challenge to the US regardless of size because it prioritizes now rather than investing in the future. I like what they're doing, but with less than 2% military spending, China is America's only challenger and overwhelming favorite.
Comparing North Korea to Iran is moot; North Korea making nukes was the most correct thing it ever did and Iran's old leader held it back big time. Compared to China, North Korea's not going anywhere with its 30%. You're criticizing China, right?
How good they are matters a lot. The only thing that North Korea makes well is nukes, and that's only assumed. They are purely defensive with a 30% budget. China makes everything well, and everything is gettng to a generation that will be a qualitative overmatch for the US... with under 2%. I like the latter.
Wait, who said anything about toilets? Did you... keep reading my post when you said you stopped?? LOL
EXACTLY. This is a very correct statement and very different from your original statement. You originally stated that to win, China needs to spend more than the US. That is wrong. The correct statement is that China needs to spend whatever it needs to spend to surpass the US; the number is much smaller because China is much more efficient and that's what it's doing.
Noooooo, the US is only attacking these other countries because it no longer has confidence confronting China so it 1) wants to vent and 2) wants to change the global landscape to be more pro-US to see if that can give it some room to maneuver with China. China having more of the same stuff wouldn't change this but China having more advanced power-projecting weapons would make the US scared to attack Chinese allies far from China. The way to develop those weapons is through research; the way to strengthen research is to strengthen the economy that supports it, and the way to strengthen that economy is to invest in it rather that spending all you can afford building more weapons now.
You're welcome? I was just pointing out a fact. How many people do you see disagreeing with you? You should have figured it out yourself.
Imbecile facts... the PRC knows the balance between investment and building weapons. That balance has led China to surpass the US in quality in many aspects where we trailed severely decades ago, all while spending less than 2%. That is the goal and we're gonna have to trust them instead of a dude who thinks North Korea is boss cus it spends a third of its GDP only outdated old weapon designs.
There seems to be a huge discussion about it: everyone against you. And building your own weapons systems doesn't mean you stop investing in the future. 30% military spending is no longer investing in the future.
Last edited: