2026 Israel-US vs. Iran conflict [Military updates/News Only]

obj 705A

Junior Member
Registered Member
Trump declares he had "wiped Iran off the map," and Netanyahu describes the night as "critical."

The past few hours have witnessed conflicting accounts of the military situation in the region. While President Trump announced the elimination of the Iranian leadership, naval forces, and air force ahead of schedule, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stressed that Israel is experiencing critical and decisive moments, affirming the continuation of military operations on all fronts despite the difficult situation on the ground.

"Iran is defenseless."

Trump, via his Truth Social account, said last night that "the United States has wiped Iran off the map," adding that Tehran no longer possesses any defense whatsoever.

He said, "They want to make a deal. I don't! We are weeks ahead of schedule. Just like their incompetent election coverage of me."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
The Eunuch “we aren’t joining the war” British have positioned a nuclear submarine to bomb Iran.

Looks like the shows begins on Monday.

UK nuclear-powered submarine positioned in Arabian Sea amid regional tensions, Daily Mail report​


March 21 (Reuters) - A British nuclear-powered submarine equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles has taken position in ‌the Arabian Sea, giving Britain the capability to launch long-range strikes if regional conflict escalates, the Daily Mail reported on Saturday.

Reuters could not immediately ⁠verify the report. The British Ministry of Defence did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
Pakistan is at war with Afghanistan right now. If Saudi ask Pakistan join the war, would Afghanistan also forced into this war, too, at the side of Iran? If it is, then it will be interesting. But maybe Pakistan can reject, with their war against Afghanistan as an excuse? Or else Pakistan will be surrounded by 3 enemies at once. India, Iran and Afghanistan. Will they do that for Saudi?
India has an agreement with UAE. Technically they can enter the war on the same side as Pakistan.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
My condolences to the Ultra Soft Arab Power.

Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central HQ Spokesperson:

If Iran’s fuel and energy infrastructure is attacked by the enemy, all energy infrastructure, information technology systems, and desalination facilities belonging to the United States and the regime in the region will be targeted. Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central HQ Spokesperson:
 

Neurosmith

Junior Member
Registered Member
The common theme of western analysts and warhawks is this belief that victory in a war is like playing wack-a-mole: "X amount of military equipment has been destroyed and Y amount of enemy soldiers have been killed, therefore we're winning the war!" There's no sense of broader strategic thinking, they get lost in all these tactical gains they completely forget what they are really trying to achieve. If you destroy military facilities and equipment and kill more troops than they kill you but the government is still in charge and they have the means to punch you back and maintain control of vital areas then I'm sorry you haven't won jack. Everybody knows the US has a larger military force in terms of materiel, spends far more on its armed forces and is a super power so its tactical victories shouldn't be news, on the contrary many of us find it funny that the self proclaimed bestest and most powerfulest military the world has ever seen has to resort to begging for help to open the Strait of Hormuz from a country that has been sanctioned to hell for decades.
It is indeed correct that the requirements and objectives of what is defined as a "victory" is vastly different between Iran and the US/Israel, and so is their respective tolerance for casualties and economic fallout. This of course changes the calculus of the whole conflict for both Iran and Israel/US. This does not change the fact that the heavy tactical advantage that the US and Israel currently enjoy - and will continue to enjoy - eats away at Iran's negotiating power and leverage with each passing day. If Iran's goal is to outlast the conflict and live to see another day, its only way to guarantee that - negotiations - will turn against the regime the longer it continues to get pummeled by the US/Israel.

So are you saying US removed sanctions on Iran and moved carriers out of theater because of potshots? Potshots that shot down F-35 and F-16s and tankers? Potshots that just killed dozens of Israeli nuclear scientists while demonstrating they can destroy Israel's nuclear reactor at any moment? lol
It is interesting to see that you interpret a precautionary move as a sign that the US is somehow backpedalling. Moving a carrier out of range of Iran's missiles, knowing that the US has the full advantage in standoff weaponry, is just basic common sense, no?

Is there evidence that Iran has killed Israeli nuclear scientists?

Are you telling me the US Navy can’t stop Iranian tanker fleet in the Arabian Sea/Indian Ocean today? What happened to Venezuela before the kidnapping of Maduro?
The reason for the takeover of Kharg Island given by the Neocons is so retarded.
Kharg Island is a negotiating tactic, not an action that will directly and proportionately result in a Hormuz Strait resolution.

What exactly did China and Russia announce?
Nothing, because it is fake news. China relies on GCC energy resources more so than it does Iran's.

And each of one of them has been replaced by even more hardline figure that will basically guarantee the country becomes the Middle-East North Korea by the end of the conflict. They are so militarily degraded that they can strike the city where Israel's main nuclear plant is, score the first ever combat hit of a 5th generation fighter jet, and launch two ballistic missiles 4,000 km from their country at a base in the ocean.
Considering that Iran has fired hundreds, if not thousands, of ballistic missiles since the beginning of the conflict and had - on paper - a sizeable military and industrial capacity prior to the war, the fact that there have been relatively few accounts of successful retaliatory strikes is a pretty clear indication that the US and allies have been effectively "curbstomping" the Iranian military while suffering disproportionately few casualties themselves, no?
 

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
It is interesting to see that you interpret a precautionary move as a sign that the US is somehow backpedalling. Moving a carrier out of range of Iran's missiles, knowing that the US has the full advantage in standoff weaponry, is just basic common sense, no?

Is there evidence that Iran has killed Israeli nuclear scientists?
I interpret the Strait of Hormuz as closed and Iran is in control of all ME oil, but I suppose that's a precautionary move too? lol
But you do need to explain to me how US unsanctioning Iranian oil because its navy is kept helpless at a distance is common sense.

Oh I don't know, why did you think Ben Gvir personally visit the site of the blown up bomb shelter next to residential buildings adjacent to the nuclear facility? lol
 
Top