China as a Super Power

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
^ Err some of the other male leaders wore the same shirt -- Ban Ki Moon, John Key and others.


Usurpers.....:D off with their heads.

Do you know whether its true, that the importance of the person, is depicted by how many Drangon Claws/toes, were visible on his dressware?

Anyway it was worth the try Rog. "FULL MARKS" to you
 
Last edited:

solarz

Brigadier
^ Err some of the other male leaders wore the same shirt -- Ban Ki Moon, John Key and others.

Wow, that had to be awkward. What a fashion faux pas!

bladerunner said:
I can recall a conversation I once had with a senior exe of a very large international corp over 25yrs ago. He told me he considered 3M one of the most innovative in its products and management staff arrangements. It was one of the first companies to allow profit sharing of successful products with its R@D team, and it even came up with the cash , to .allow staff to pursue their own pet projects.

However I never did question the validity in what he told me. but i also remember reading an article a couple of yrs later about 3M in Time or a similar type of magazine, commenting on their pioneering approch to what ever it was research?

3M? Didn't they make diskettes? Wow, you are so old! :p
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
Wow, that had to be awkward. What a fashion faux pas!



3M? Didn't they make diskettes? Wow, you are so old! :p

Aaa Whats that you saying young fella?, hold it a second while I turn the sound down on my wireless:eek:


Originally Posted by Bltizo
^ Err some of the other male leaders wore the same shirt

WEll I hope they washed it in between
 
Last edited:

Spartan95

Junior Member
The world's most populous nation is undertaking its once in a decade population census again:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China starts counting its huge population
Posted: 01 November 2010 1625 hrs

BEIJING : China kicked off its national census on Monday with millions of counters setting out to tally the world's biggest population, estimated last year to be over 1.3 billion, state press reported.

More than six million census takers are expected to gather the latest data on China's population, including the nation's unprecedented urbanisation drive and the latest results on its controversial "one child" family planning policy.

The government has promised complete confidentiality during the month-long count, although census takers will be able to call for police help if people refuse to take part, the official China Daily newspaper said.

Officials have acknowledged that the count will be a difficult task due in part to the nation's huge migrant population, which is wary of giving away information that could land them in trouble with the law.

An estimated 211 million people make up China's "floating population" -- an army of migrant labourers descending on cities and towns in an unprecedented wave of urbanisation.

Besides making a shambles of China's strict "household registration system" that for decades has registered one person in one particular area, many migrant workers have also violated the "one child" population control policy.

In the 2000 census, China's population was calculated at 1.29 billion, compared to 594 million in the first census in 1953.

The count will also provide a snapshot of China's growing gender imbalance -- often linked to the "one child" policy and a preference for boys -- which has resulted in millions of men of marrying age without wives.

In addition, fresh data on China's quickly ageing population will be gathered, officials have said.

This census also marks the first time China will count the number of foreigners living and working in the country.

- AFP /ls

Plenty of different slants to the reporting by the numerous media on the internet. Some reported the difficulty about population census (educated know their privacy rights, uneducated has fear of the authorities, etc), others say that this time round is a huge improvement with new measures (counting where people work, not where they stay; expats counted as well).

Will be interesting to see the final result that comes out. It was already close to 1.3 billion ten years ago. Wonder how much the population has grown?
 

Spartan95

Junior Member
China's influence on the international stage got a boost a few days back when they became the nation with the 3rd largest voting share in IMF:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China gets major stake in IMF vote overhaul
By Lesley Wroughton

WASHINGTON | Fri Nov 5, 2010 10:47pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a historic decision, the International Monetary Fund board agreed Friday to boost the voting power of big emerging economies and make China the third leading voice in the global lender.

"This historic agreement is the most fundamental governance overhaul in the fund's 65-year history and the biggest ever shift of influence in favor of emerging market and developing countries to recognize their growing role in the global economy," IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn told a news conference.

Under the deal, first clinched by finance ministers of Group of 20 leading economies in South Korea last month, 6 percent of IMF voting shares will be transferred to "dynamic" emerging market countries from industrial economies.

The move would vault China over Germany, France and Britain into third spot behind the United States and Japan. It would also lift other large emerging powers India, Brazil and Russia into the top 10 of the 187-member institution.

Emerging economies have gained more clout in the IMF over the past five years, but Friday's shift is by far the most significant, amounting to an overhaul of the global economic order established when the IMF was set up after World War Two.

The IMF's member countries will vote on the reforms in the coming weeks, with 85 percent of support needed for the changes to pass. Some countries will also require legislative approval, including the United States.

Strauss-Kahn said he did not believe this week's congressional elections in the United States, where Republicans won control of the House of Representatives, would delay approval in Washington.

The move doubles IMF member quotas, or subscriptions, boosting the lender's resources by about $755.7 billion at current exchange rates, the fund said.

The board also endorsed changes in its own makeup to reduce Europe's influence on the 24-member decision-making body. European countries will give up two of the eight or nine seats they hold at any given time to emerging countries at the end of two years.

BIGGER SAY, BIGGER RESPONSIBILITY

U.S.-China tensions have flared this year over business and trade, but especially over China's undervalued currency that Washington argues gives Beijing an unfair trade advantage.

Analysts believe that unless China allows its currency to rise significantly, the Obama administration may wait to submit the IMF vote changes to Congress for approval.

Strauss-Kahn said having a bigger say in the IMF came with greater responsibility in the global economy and China recognized that.

"I think (IMF reforms) may have an influence on the behavior of the Chinese authorities. They were willing to have this position, they were willing to be better represented in the IMF, which shows they do care about multilateral institutions," he said. "I expect they will behave, or have in mind the importance of their role."

The IMF board's approval Friday came before next week's G20 leaders' summit in South Korea where the United States is seeking agreement to limit global trade imbalances.

Emerging economies are unlikely to be sympathetic after the U.S. Federal Reserve embarked on a new $600 billion bond-buying spree this week, sparking criticism from Brazil, China and South Africa that the Fed's money printing could weaken the dollar and send a surge of investor cash into their economies.

(Reporting by Lesley Wroughton; Editing by Peter Cooney)

Underpinned by its economic might, China's diplomatic influence is growing rapidly as evidenced by this IMF move, the way France welcomed Hu Jintao, the way the British are seeking to sign deals with them in the days ahead, etc.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China, Britain sign deals before Cameron's visit
Posted: 08 November 2010 2034 hrs

BEIJING : Chinese and British firms have signed a raft of deals worth millions of dollars, the British embassy said Monday on the eve of a visit by Prime Minister David Cameron aimed at boosting business ties.

British Business Secretary Vince Cable on Monday opened three days of talks in the Chinese capital, the embassy said. Cameron is expected to arrive with a major delegation of top business leaders looking to seal lucrative agreements.

"China is a huge opportunity for UK businesses and I would urge more companies to follow in their footsteps," said Cable, who met Commerce Minister Chen Deming on Monday.

"China is our ninth largest export market, but it is the world's second-largest economy and the potential for expanding our partnership is huge."

Cameron has described his two-day trip to China ahead of the Group of 20 summit in Seoul as a "vitally important trade mission."

Since taking power in May, Cameron has vowed "closer engagement" with China, and put "banging the drum for trade" at the heart of his foreign policy amid deep spending cuts at home after the financial crisis.

The contracts announced on Monday are worth at least 12 million pounds (19 million US dollars), according to the embassy statement -- a possible prelude to what British companies hope will be a big pay-off later this week.

They include a two-million-pound coal injection technology agreement between British firm Clyde Blowers and Yima Coal Industry Group as well as contracts worth four million pounds for architecture firm Benoy.

Trade between the two nations was worth 51.8 billion US dollars last year, with Britain exporting 12.4 billion US dollars worth of goods and services to the rapidly growing economic powerhouse.

- AFP/ir

12 million pound "appettiser" before the heads of state meet. The "main course" should be much bigger.
 

xywdx

Junior Member
[qimg]http://i55.tinypic.com/1tm2w3.jpg[/qimg]
We can get a glimpse of what a superpower China would be like from this photo.

China is boldly telling the world that it expects to be considered "big brother" in East Asia. Here, Wen Jiabao appears before world leaders in what appears to be a modern interpretation of a Chinese Emperor's gown.

The statement to the world is: China is reasserting its traditional sphere of influence in East Asia. The world view of the Chinese imperial dynasties is back. Before you is the "Jiabao Emperor."

If it means anything, there were other leaders at the event dressed in their native attires, just look closely at the picture and you'll see one right away.
But that also brings up the question, who made the rule that leaders had to wear suits?

Do you know whether its true, that the importance of the person, is depicted by how many Drangon Claws/toes, were visible on his dressware?

Not only dressware, the accessories you wear, and the decorations around and inside your house, the transportation mode you employ are all representations of your status. It was very difficult to mistake one's station in life back in the imperial Chinese days.

As for the dragon claws, it is generally accepted that 3 talon dragons are for commoners, 4 talon are for nobles and foreign rulers, 5 talon is reserved exclusively for the imperial family.

The numbers accepted various from dynasty to dynasty, with 9 always used for the emperor himself, it is perhaps important to note that even though the Emperor wears 9, he is expected to cover at least 1 out of respect for heaven and the gods.
 

maozedong

Banned Idiot
China certainly is a Super Power, if you see the photo below, you would accept this fact, at least, the Japanese say so.


33m32jd.jpg
 

cn_habs

Junior Member
China is already a superpower minus the military mights but I doubt she can attract foreign talents the way the US can. Therefore, it's gonna be a huge task to overtake the US if she can accomplish it at all.
 
Top