The Supreme Chairman of Peace will be announcing the “Peace Through Total War Coin™” soon.
Did he make this decision after consulting grok?
The Supreme Chairman of Peace will be announcing the “Peace Through Total War Coin™” soon.
Thankfully, the only Canadians who want to join with the US are the far-right class who aren't very influential in politics. The real obstacle for this white supremacy that has unfolded is the general population now being educated enough to know that their country's origins were based on genocide and they, themselves are mostly averted to it.The thing you have to realise about Americans and by extension the Anglos of the five eyes, is that being settler colonist societies built on genocide and land theft, they wish to bury their past but also want the benefits of having a long and storied glorious civilisation like China, but how can you do that if youre ashamed of your past and want to bury it? You fabricate a fake culture like the Zionist Jews are doing with Israel and you use an external bogeyman to try to cement a new identity. Zionist Jews use the holocaust, anglos like Steve Bannon want a Gotterdamerung or a racial holy war against China which they hope will band together all western and european peoples under a pan white new state entity.
Outside of the British isles, none of the five eyes are a real nation state per se like France or Sweden with their own native cultures and traditions, Australia is a fake country, effectively a colonial mining outpost where its white Anglo elites frequently serve the power structure of the Atlantic; now this fake culture that the Anglos are trying to create is based on nothing more than white supremacy and white privilege, so much of why the modern white nationalism today is so popular is because of a loss of privilege by a lot of white males today. Canada’s Carney striking out for Canada against Trumpist desire for a North American Anschluss is the outlier, I fear most Canadians outside of Quebec would, like Anglo Australians, not object to a political union with the U.S.
I have lost count: ByteDance’s U.S. TikTok arm; the Wingtech–Nexperia unit; Wingtech’s Newport wafer fab; Sinochem and its stake in Pirelli; and now the two port concessions at the Panama Canal held by Hutchison. There has been zero cost imposed from Beijing’s side. It’s a disaster. Every time, it’s just a verbal rebuke from a low-ranking civil servant, Guo Jiankun. Tell Guo to shut up and let someone with real authority actually do something. We don’t need words from a parrot. They have exactly zero meaning.
Panama rules against Hong Kong operator, enabling canal port takeover welcomed by US
on Monday took control of two ports at the Atlantic and Pacific entrances of the after a Supreme Court ruling voided the concession of their Hong Kong-based operator, a move Washington officials said was “in line with President Donald Trump’s drive to curb Chinese influence” over the strategic waterway. A decree published in the official gazette authorises the Panama Maritime Authority to occupy and run the ports of Balboa and Cristobal for “reasons of urgent social interest”, and to take possession of movable assets needed to keep them operating, including cranes, vehicles, computer systems and software.
A decree published in the official gazette authorises the Panama Maritime Authority to occupy and run the ports of Balboa and Cristobal for “reasons of urgent social interest”, and to take possession of movable assets needed to keep them operating, including cranes, vehicles, computer systems and software.
The action followed the formal publication of the court’s January decision declaring unconstitutional the law approving the concession held by Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of Hong Kong conglomerate . Under Panamanian law, the ruling became final once it appeared in the gazette, clearing the way for immediate state intervention.
Alberto Aleman Zubieta, who heads the technical team overseeing the transition, said the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) had taken possession of both ports by decree to ensure uninterrupted operations once the ruling became final upon publication.
“Two separate contracts are being presented to the Board of Directors of the AMP, one for the Port of Balboa and one for the Port of Cristobal, instead of a single contract for both ports,” he told a press conference.
Panama’s President had previously said that until the decision became final, there would be continuity with the current operator, followed by a transition period leading to a new concession under terms favourable to Panama. On Monday, officials said port activities would continue as the state assumed control.
Trump administration happy with Panama Canal ports decision
The decision was welcomed in Washington. A senior administration official told the South China Morning Post that the administration congratulated Panama for taking steps to assert its sovereignty and said the action aligned with vision for the canal.
The official said the president had “made clear that Chinese control of the Panama Canal was unacceptable, violated the US Panama treaty and jeopardised US national and economic security”.
“The must be pre-eminent in the western hemisphere as a condition of our security and prosperity – a condition that allows us to assert ourselves confidently where and when we need to in the region,” they said.
“The terms of our alliances and the terms upon which we provide any kind of aid must be contingent on winding down adversarial outside influence – from control of military installations, ports, and key infrastructure to the purchase of strategic assets broadly defined,” the official added.
The dispute over the terminals has been building for months and has drawn in Washington and , turning a domestic legal battle into a test case in the broader strategic rivalry between the world’s two largest economies.
Balboa and Cristobal sit at opposite ends of the canal, which carries about five per cent of global maritime trade and is a vital artery for US commercial and naval traffic. The Panama Ports Company has operated the facilities since 1997 under a 25-year concession renewed in 2021.
In July, Panama’s comptroller general filed lawsuits before the Supreme Court seeking to annul the renewal, alleging constitutional breaches and financial irregularities, including claims that the operator had failed to meet certain payment obligations.
The company rejected the allegations and called for respect for legal certainty.
The full bench of the Supreme Court then struck down the law approving the concession last month, while also invalidating amendments and an extension linked to the original contract. The ruling cannot be appealed within Panama.
US officials and Republican lawmakers welcomed that decision, with saying he was encouraged by the court’s ruling and warning that if a company answerable to Beijing controlled ports at both ends of the canal, it could effectively shut down the waterway during a conflict, describing such a scenario as a direct threat to US interests.
Members of Congress also framed the judgment as proof that sustained pressure from Washington was yielding results in the hemisphere.
Beijing accuses Panama of ‘undermining the rule of law’
Beijing and Hong Kong authorities, on the other hand, criticised the decision, accusing Panama of “undermining the rule of law and harming investor confidence”. In a commentary, Hong Kong officials said the concession had been in force for nearly three decades and warned of political and economic consequences.
But President Mulino pushed back against foreign criticism and defended the judiciary as independent. He said the government’s focus now is safeguarding jobs and maintaining port operations, which he describes as central to Panama’s economy.
“Panama is a state governed by the rule of law and respects the decisions of the Judicial Branch, which is independent from the Central Government. The Foreign Ministry will issue a statement on this matter and will adopt the corresponding decisions,” he wrote on X earlier this month.
CK Hutchison-controlled Panama Ports Company said it had invested more than US$1.8 billion in infrastructure and technology over nearly 30 years and initiated international arbitration proceedings against the Republic of Panama under International Chamber of Commerce rules, arguing that the state had breached the concession agreement.
The dispute also intersected with a separate attempt by CK Hutchison to sell more than 40 ports worldwide in a multibillion-dollar deal with a consortium led by and .
Chinese regulators signalled they would scrutinise the transaction, and reports indicated Beijing sought a greater role for state-owned shipping giant Cosco in any arrangement involving the Panama terminals.
lmao Ukraine is fucking stupid. They don't know how weak their positions are, if the west starts to publish Ukrainian Neo-nazis their public support rate would drop to 0 overnight.
That sucks to hear. She had a lot of based takes on the Uyghur shit being pushed the last few years and overall espoused anti-American imperialist opinions. I saw in one video, she mentioned that she grew up in Idaho. Must of been hell to grow up looking like her in the core region of white supremacist activity. Probably influences her to push herself as a "good asian" unlike those disobedient Chinese. Anyways, gonna stop watching her youtube channel going forward.Anyone know YouTube personality Kim Iverson? She’s in a controversy right now because she went on social media saying everyone hates the Chinese. Apparently this started because she didn’t like the reaction to those claiming it’s “Chinese” New Year not Lunar or Tet. Is that what set her off? Well her saying everyone hates the Chinese is her saying there’s something natural to hating Chinese and something not done with intent or taught. That’s her racism which she is trying to say it’s ok and not bad like as if it was taught. And whites will love to defend that because they like Vietnamese (who aren’t a threat to white supremacy) better than Chinese (who are).
CNBC examines the high-stakes decisions transforming the U.S. auto industry.
Cars once promised independence and transportation for all Americans. Now, they are a luxury product that cost about $50,000, nearly 30% higher than just a few years ago. Affordable vehicles, especially those below the price of $20,000, have nearly disappeared. And while Automakers pulled in record profits in 2023, slim margins combined with deep investments into EV batteries, software and other technology is making it hard to produce cars much cheaper. Chinese automakers can, but they're impeded by tariffs and rules. Insiders say that is just a bandage - automakers need to compete.
For more than 30 years, Japan’s economy was defined by deflation, negative interest rates, and economic stagnation. Now inflation has returned, corporate governance reforms are gaining traction, and investors are taking a fresh look at Japanese markets. We speak with Apollo CEO Marc Rowan, Japan Exchange Group CEO Hiromi Yamaji, and Mireya Solís of the Brookings Institution to examine whether Japan is finally breaking free from the so-called ‘lost decades,’ and what could derail the comeback.