

I'm more interested in the potential for the depiction/stacking missiles vertically to better use weapons bay volume.Excerpts from an academic paper, depicting a flying-wing U(C)AV that features a slight beak nose and an IWB.
The U(C)AV has a length of 2.4 meters and a wingspan of 4.8 meters. The IWB is 0.82 meters long, 0.3 meters wide and 0.3 meters deep.
The IWB is depicted to be carrying 6 missiles. The missiles are separated 0.015 meters horizontally and 0.02 meters vertically.
Wondering if this is a scaled-down simulation model of the GJ-X? Or some other unknown U(C)AV model?
View attachment 165571
View attachment 165572
View attachment 165573
View attachment 165574
Excerpts from an academic paper, depicting a flying-wing U(C)AV that features a slight beak nose and an IWB.
The U(C)AV has a length of 2.4 meters and a wingspan of 4.8 meters. The IWB is 0.82 meters long, 0.3 meters wide and 0.3 meters deep.
The IWB is depicted to be carrying 6 missiles. The missiles are separated 0.015 meters horizontally and 0.02 meters vertically.
Wondering if this is a scaled-down simulation model of the GJ-X? Or some other unknown U(C)AV model?
View attachment 165571 View attachment 165572
View attachment 165573 View attachment 165574
If the H-20 actually proves to be that batwing design, then I’m going to join the USAF just to hopefully get an opportunity to shoot it down.A paper on "Body freedom flutter ground test of flying wing aircraft", originally posted by @nuwangzi
View attachment 165705
View attachment 165706
View attachment 165707
View attachment 165708
If God exists, or the H-20 exists? At this point I'm agnostic on both.ohh god if you exist please dont have the h20 end up looking like this.