PLA Small arms

Redekr

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Two different models. I wonder which one is the earlier prototype. Did the magazine say when or how old this is?
This is another part of the article.
Seems that all weapon tests are done with the prototype with exposed gas block and a foregrip

Note the marked text:
"This program is funded by Hunan Technology Innovation Program,Project code:2023RC3267"

The article itself is published in May 2025
IMG_20251129_142945.jpg
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
I didn't know they allow beard in PLA.
Uyghurs and certain other minorities get it in Western China since shaving there is painful. As a matter of fact, one of the officers who was part of the series of clashes with India several years ago was a Uyghur whom the Indians thought was Pakistani undercover military officer.
 

talonn

Junior Member
Registered Member
I solely believe that the PLA will use QBU191 as a future reference for what their Next version of the 191 will be, considering it boasts impressive accuracy and low recoil, it seems that they will invest more expensive resources on Marksman Long - Mid range instead of Close Range encounters.

Out of all of the 191's the designated marksman rifle QBU hit the jackpot the most.
Saw the video of it firing. Impressive RoF and recoil indeed. Any downside that we might not know about?
 

Saru

New Member
Registered Member
Saw the video of it firing. Impressive RoF and recoil indeed. Any downside that we might not know about?
The problem with the gun it keyholes sometimes, the cartridge tend to get caught inside the chamber although it is not often it's a rare instance they are usually defect models.

While China is trying to catch up they remain behind other Countries when it comes to quality of their Guns the main problem with the QBZ19 is the quality control similar to QBZ-95 reportedly some of it's ergonomics easily gets worn out that can affect the performance of the gun.

It is a substantial improvement over the QBZ-95 unfortunately it's design is outdated.

Which is why no foreign armies are interested in buying their next generation rifle it doesn't really do anything different from what a M4 does except it struggles with modularity the amount of ergonomics that can be swapped with the QBZ-191 is non existent.
 

Sunbud

Junior Member
Registered Member
The problem with the gun it keyholes sometimes, the cartridge tend to get caught inside the chamber although it is not often it's a rare instance they are usually defect models.

While China is trying to catch up they remain behind other Countries when it comes to quality of their Guns the main problem with the QBZ19 is the quality control similar to QBZ-95 reportedly some of it's ergonomics easily gets worn out that can affect the performance of the gun.

It is a substantial improvement over the QBZ-95 unfortunately it's design is outdated.

Which is why no foreign armies are interested in buying their next generation rifle it doesn't really do anything different from what a M4 does except it struggles with modularity the amount of ergonomics that can be swapped with the QBZ-191 is non existent.
Wasn't the video of key holing not proven to be due to the use of rubber sim munitions in an indoor range? I am not aware of this being a common problem firing live ammunition.
 
Top