I think this has less to do with currencies for the trade and more about Australia demanding China pay an +$15 premium per metric tonne above the spot price.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
I think this has less to do with currencies for the trade and more about Australia demanding China pay an +$15 premium per metric tonne above the spot price.
plawolf
Lieutenant General
He is just salty because he knows his skull wouldn’t pass QC to be able to count as a real skull for a skull throne and get chucked on the rejects pile. Just like anyone would do with a watermelon like this.
Other currencies can also buy products, money primary purposes is to be a medium exchange of the whole nation. The currency values can't be fluctuate as it would directly harm people livelihood and industries which allowing too much RMB to circulate outside control decrease ability of pboc to made currency stable. Autarky should be the aim while allows international trade to continue.
This is actually a very interesting subject, because there's a pretty close correlation between high level of rice consumption in East Asia and high IQ in the region. Of course correlation doesn't imply causation, it could also be the use of Chinese derived logographic languages which induces greater ability to handle abstractions, or just good old race.
Conversely there also seem to be a correlation between American's consumption of large amount of GMO corn animal feed and low IQ.
Can probably cook the rind in a soup like winter melon.
In4ser
Junior Member
I remember hearing talk about having two currencies one for onshore RMB with capital controls and another for freely floated for offshore transactions. Maybe the plan is to use the HK dollar maybe rename it the Chinese dollar and keep the Chinese yuan for domestic use? I maybe off base here.
Watermelon rinds are great in stir fry.
Someone tell me why western techbros embrace the warlord label while Chinese techbros grovel at international regulators' feet, begging not to be labelled as such?
Better yet, flood the international arms market and give discounts to whoever challenges western interests.
EDIT: Economic interdependence is cope. Stop pretending trade will prevent conflict. It won't. The US has decided China is the pacing threat. Europe follows US security policy. Accept the bifurcation, weaponize the dependencies you've created, and impose maximum costs on adversaries while you still can.
Last edited:
If you look at it. it is not big shift untill 2050. but its greater impact is on higher standard of living countries like Western Europe. India and rest are already known. my theory is automation in Gulf Arab countries will decrease water use in India.