Chinese Engine Development

Tomboy

Junior Member
Registered Member
To be fair, the WS-10 family uses composite casings and wouldn't have the fishnet ribbing as a result. But I want the beer belly too
Why do WS-10 use composite compressor casings? I'm pretty sure this is one of the only engines in production that actually uses this
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
It's an odd design choice considering no other engine uses this not even successor engines like WS-15 and WS-19. I'm curious of the reasoning behind this and why it was not considered for any known future engine.
Just because other engines don’t use a solution doesn’t mean the design choice is “odd”. Do you have an engineering justification for why you think it’s odd or are you just making assumptions based on blind conformity?
 

Tomboy

Junior Member
Registered Member
Just because other engines don’t use a solution doesn’t mean the design choice is “odd”. Do you have an engineering justification for why you think it’s odd or are you just making assumptions based on blind conformity?
This quite literally is the definition of "Odd" since it does not conform with all other known peers and is to my knowledge the only engine that uses this technology. I'm actually asking for an engineering justification on why this was used since this is an uncommon design hopefully someone knowledgeable can answer it.
 

amchan

New Member
Registered Member
This quite literally is the definition of "Odd" since it does not conform with all other known peers and is to my knowledge the only engine that uses this technology. I'm actually asking for an engineering justification on why this was used since this is an uncommon design hopefully someone knowledgeable can answer it.
Does the M88 not use a similar casing? You need to expand your horizons.
 

Alfa_Particle

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 156629
Maximum thrust: up to 128900 N
Bypass ratio: 0.4.
Thrust-to-weight ratio: up to 7.9.

Tested by High-Altitude Simulation Test Bench
This is allegedly the WS-19. 129 kN, OPR of 32. I freaking called it (it's even 1 kN more than I expected). EJ270 reincarnated.

I have a couple explainations about the seemingly low T/W, but let's see...
 
Last edited:

Tomboy

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is allegedly the WS-19. 129 kN, OPR of 32. I freaking called it (it's even 1 kN more than I expected). EJ270 reincarnated.

I have a couple explainations about the seemingly low T/W, but let's see...
BPR is superisingly high for a supposedly supercruise capable engine while TWR is very low
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
View attachment 156629
Maximum thrust: up to 128900 N
Bypass ratio: 0.4.
Thrust-to-weight ratio: up to 7.9.

Tested by High-Altitude Simulation Test Bench
This is allegedly the WS-19. 129 kN, OPR of 32. I freaking called it (it's even 1 kN more than I expected). EJ270 reincarnated.

I have a couple explainations about the seemingly low T/W, but let's see...
Err no. These numbers literally look like the earlier version of the WS-10.
 
Top