Miscellaneous News

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
By Li Yuan
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I think she is another disciple of comrade Chang.

But she is more low key, and speaks with big voice, then disappears again.

Keep the messaging constant is the key.

If Americans begin to have doubts about the narrative, comrade Chang will go onto Faux News and appear unhinged, and that seems to always work, as they all go back to the proper narrative. He is the best that was ever invented.

:D
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
This sounds like trade war with Chinese characteristics. :cool:

Whether with plausible deniability or not, it would be badass to simply make rare earths and any magnets made from them nearly impossible to export. Likewise with anything else that could have dual use properties. Give them all a long hard taste of their own medicine. Unfortunately, it sounds like using air freight is working due to less strict monitoring there.

You know, I really do not get it.

They wanted decoupling, so finally the PRC had enough, here's your decoupling.

Now they are not happy.

Actually, I got no idea where this is going.

Seems like there is still no rush to find rare earth products sourced outside from China.

Western companies have to redesign their products.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
You know, I really do not get it.

They wanted decoupling, so finally the PRC had enough, here's your decoupling.

Now they are not happy.

Actually, I got no idea where this is going.

Seems like there is still no rush to find rare earth products sourced outside from China.

Western companies have to redesign their products.

Typical modern Anglo mentality of wanting to have their cake and eat it too.

Modern western leaders are without exception silver-spoon spoilt brats that have only experienced the world in their privileged bubbles where their family’s wealth and influence means they could get away with basically anything.

This is the world where the elite jokes that laws that only impose a fine are really activities that are legal for a price. And even when they break laws that carry actual prison time if convicted, they can afford top lawyers who can get them off so long as the evidence isn’t ridiculously overwhelming.

Indeed, dragging out court cases that he could not possibly win on merits until the other party is bankrupted and cannot continue litigation is a favoured ‘business strategy’ of Trump throughout his life.

When people like this who have managed to bend and break rules at will all their lives without suffering real consequence gets into position of power, their sense of right and wrong is so warped that they honestly don’t see what the problem is when they demand that they can hit (sanction) you, but you can’t hit (sanction) them back in response.

And it’s not just Trump. Almost all past US presidents that have used US military force abroad applied basically the same logic, where the Americans can go and bomb people all over the world in their homes and it’s how the world works, but it’s terrorism when the people they bombed strike them back where they live. And it’s not just 9/11, when Al-Q attacked the USS Cole, a US warship, the Americans still called that terrorism. So it’s clear the Americans make zero distinctions if it’s their military or civilian targets that gets hit, if anyone hits American targets, it’s automatically terrorism.

The only true distinction between Trump and his predecessors is that he is a lot more open and honest about his application of American exceptionalism, and he is more universal in its application where he dares to go after allies and China, while past US presidents only went after 3rd world minnow powers.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Typical modern Anglo mentality of wanting to have their cake and eat it too.

Modern western leaders are without exception silver-spoon spoilt brats that have only experienced the world in their privileged bubbles where their family’s wealth and influence means they could get away with basically anything.

This is the world where the elite jokes that laws that only impose a fine are really activities that are legal for a price. And even when they break laws that carry actual prison time if convicted, they can afford top lawyers who can get them off so long as the evidence isn’t ridiculously overwhelming.

Indeed, dragging out court cases that he could not possibly win on merits until the other party is bankrupted and cannot continue litigation is a favoured ‘business strategy’ of Trump throughout his life.

When people like this who have managed to bend and break rules at will all their lives without suffering real consequence gets into position of power, their sense of right and wrong is so warped that they honestly don’t see what the problem is when they demand that they can hit (sanction) you, but you can’t hit (sanction) them back in response.

And it’s not just Trump. Almost all past US presidents that have used US military force abroad applied basically the same logic, where the Americans can go and bomb people all over the world in their homes and it’s how the world works, but it’s terrorism when the people they bombed strike them back where they live. And it’s not just 9/11, when Al-Q attacked the USS Cole, a US warship, the Americans still called that terrorism. So it’s clear the Americans make zero distinctions if it’s their military or civilian targets that gets hit, if anyone hits American targets, it’s automatically terrorism.

The only true distinction between Trump and his predecessors is that he is a lot more open and honest about his application of American exceptionalism, and he is more universal in its application where he dares to go after allies and China, while past US presidents only went after 3rd world minnow powers.
Not surprising since he has been in a position of privilege since birth. Affluenza tends to do that to people.
 

sheogorath

Colonel
Registered Member
Below a certain tier or ranking, yes. Above a certain tier or ranking, it makes a huge difference to your earnings. You can sometimes go from sub-6-figs pre-MBA to immediately ~200k in your first role afterwards.
Sure, if you want a position within the companies that perpetuate the scam. Chances are you'll still be passed up if the CEO's kid's buddy shows up for the same role, MBA or no MBA.

And shits get worse if your boss is Indian.
I agree luck is large part of it but someone can also make money without any startup by simply becoming a broker with zero cent in his pocket and still walk away with millions
Sure but you still need some form of contact to land that broker job if you don't want to rely on sheer luck. And again, you can do that without a business degree.
 

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
Sure, if you want a position within the companies that perpetuate the scam. Chances are you'll still be passed up if the CEO's kid's buddy shows up for the same role, MBA or no MBA.

And shits get worse if your boss is Indian.
You're absolutely right about that, but where else can you complete a 2 year program that will double your pre-admission salary right after graduation? For some of the international students that get recruited into corporate America afterwards, many are even looking at a 6-fold to 8-fold increase. I agree about everything you just said but there are still no better alternatives to it short of medical or dental. Those have more and higher hoops to jump through, and the day to day for those isn't for everyone either. And of course dental doesn't come with the possibility of immigration. Law has a bigger investment and is also a crapshoot for most people unless your institution is ranked high enough, no different than business. And not sure if there are any immigration options for that path. 5-6 years for a STEM phD is an insane commitment that only certain types of people could look at and think "that's for me". In short, there is no great option and they all have massive tradeoffs that won't work for everyone.

Factor in immigration and MBA, STEM phD, or MD are the only options left. PhD if you don't have enough family financial support and have what it takes. MD if you have what it takes and have enough family financial support or can accept the insane debt. MBA if you have enough family financial support and can only accept a shorter time investment. It's pretty clear that each path is more optimized for a particular type of person with a particular background. So I wouldn't just go ahead and condemn anyone for taking any of these paths really. I've met Chinese people who finished non-top5 ranked business schools who bank near half a million/yr ten years after graduation without needing to invest in their own business or startup. Sure, they were much more competitive than the rest of their class, but the point is this is still very much a viable choice.
 
Last edited:
Top