Either that or more likely that as I said before H-20 will be designed with this requirement in mind: Take off from mainland China, refuel once in Chinese controlled first island chain and strike targets in CONUS before returning. IMO carrying strike on far out US assets in the third island chain and CONUS should be a main design requirement and not a "nice to have" feature.then China need forward bases just like USA.. so we should talk with Russia ??
Kinda surprised no one has posted this article yet.
If it is a UAV then it is (I) very large; and (ii) appears to be aimed at the same niche as CH-7.
Kinda surprised no one has posted this article yet.
This has double the wingspan, CH-7 has 26m, this is 52m.If it is a UAV then it is (I) very large; and (ii) appears to be aimed at the same niche as CH-7.
The RQ-180 is a strictly ISR platform with a similar aspect ratio to this aircraft while boasting a estimated wingspan of 40m. This could be China's equivalent, with longer endurance and range which could lead to it's larger size.This has double the wingspan, CH-7 has 26m, this is 52m.
CH-7 is strictly ISR, where this could be a bomber or ISR.