The Kashmir conflict 2025.

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
She might’ve been killed or severely injured during the shoot down. It is also possible that Indians don’t want to dignify this with a response but given the lengths they’ve gone to to lie and obfuscate truth, it isn’t likely.
Hasn't made Indians admit anything before. They could just follow protocol and say she died or got maimed in a car accident the day after Sindoor was over during India's infamous nation-wide 2 week long post-war curse...
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Competition drove much of the chaos in India. On NDTV, the country’s most-watched news channel according to the Reuters Institute at Oxford University, a hot mic caught a reporter in the field venting his frustration to the control room: “First you keep saying, ‘Give an update, give an update,’ and then later you say, ‘Why did you give something fake?’
1749470250013.jpeg
They’ve even owned up to the fact that they’ve been reporting BS for views and clicks. Does any of the feel good stories about Sindhoor have even a nugget of truth to them?
 

neutralobserver

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 153973
They’ve even owned up to the fact that they’ve been reporting BS for views and clicks. Does any of the feel good stories about Sindhoor have even a nugget of truth to them?
So far, they've claimed to have shot down 8 F-16s, 2 JF-17s, and 2 SAAB AWACS, all in their fantasy land. I fully expect them to publish more fake news in the coming days and months and to manipulate Wikipedia as well. If it weren’t for civilians in India who photographed the wreckage and posted it online, the Indians wouldn’t have even admitted to their losses. One of their serving generals went on air and lied that Pakistan fired missiles towards Golden Temple (religious place for Sikhs) and their official army accounts have even posted images of their own SAM wreckage as supposed proof of Pakistani ballistic missile strikes (Shaheen-3) in India (Pakistan didn't use any ballistic or cruise missiles from its inventory).
 

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 153973
They’ve even owned up to the fact that they’ve been reporting BS for views and clicks. Does any of the feel good stories about Sindhoor have even a nugget of truth to them?
I still expect more embarrassments to come as time passes.

And do you know what India will learn from this? Nothing. And thats a good thing.
 

AlexYe

Junior Member
Registered Member
Last edited:

AlexYe

Junior Member
Registered Member
A Pakistani podcast on the whole episode. Extremely humble compared to the Indian side and focusing mainly on the shortcomings of their own side.


I gave a listen to the Brahmos podcast, and they immediately talk about

How India currently used their 'older outdated' stock not the new 'updated missiles' ? How or who said that? the source of this?
Arent they originally P800 missiles that have been updated with better speed/internals and India still relies on russian made stuff to manufacture the missile locally?
They also talk about heavily about interceptions, Dont talk about the EW stuff they did, we did see one of the missiles veer off and hit the hill instead (that was the video that people saw and assumed it was intentional hit=kiranahills) stuff, another one that veered and hit a power-line. And we did see plenty of interceptions on Karachi airbase and Rafique airbase,
I also found this but not sure how authentic this is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

They make some good/'everyone knows this' points about geography depth issues,
And they make the claim that india can make 200 missiles a year.

I do agree that they are humble and more sane, more focused on the the weaknesses and lessons learned.
 
Top