Miscellaneous News

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Most people would gladly take Palestinians into their country. can't say the same about Israelis.

Is that why Egypt and Jordan are so hostile to accepting more Palestinian refugees, even though they effectively received US bribes . . . I mean aid . . . measured in the $ billions over the decades for taking in Palestinian refugees and for making peace (at least temporarily) with Israel?

Is that also why the GCC sheikhdoms have by and far, for decades, rejected Palestinian refugees in general, minus perhaps the most capable and educated of Palestine and Palestinian descent?

No offense, but I don't really care for or between Israel and Palestine. Just not my problem.

However, there's a reason why even the Palestinians' fellow Arabs are rather thoroughly unsure if they can welcome (more) Palestinians.

Frankly, it's a tragedy, but just more reason for the Palestinians and Israelis to sort out their differences themselves.

you have no idea because you have limited understanding of Russian economy and who are actually filling the dependencies. Automobile is a choice not a dependency.
Russia have been backstabbing countries through effective use of Soft Power that was given to it much earlier but disclose recently when Kazan become capital of Islamic culture and Grozny is the capital of Russian culture and Putin start talking about Russian civilization in a different way. when country accumulate so much Arabic soft power it has to keep that trust not even people who are so close to them actually understand what they are doing.



.

Are you being facetious and/or sarcastic or do you seriously believe Kazan, the capital of the Republic of Tartarstan, to be the "capital of Islamic culture," and Grozny, the capital of the Chechen Republic, to be the "capital of Russian culture?"

Not to be rude, but the majority of Russians aren't Muslim or Tartar or Chechen, and that is an unimpeachable fact.

Therefore, as you can imagine, it's rather challenging to believe any city currently located within the Russian Federation, namely Kazan, is central to Islamic culture, and that the capital of an ethno-religious minority republic within the Russian Federation, namely Grozny, is somehow central to Russian culture.

However, you do seem reasonably consistent, and as such sincere in your beliefs, so you're welcome to make your case regarding Kazan and Grozny in particular, and Russia and Islam in general.

However, as it stands, I'm afraid your claims concerning Kazan and Grozny are rather incredulous, if not outright surreal from my humble, if not ignorant perspective . . .
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Are you being facetious and/or sarcastic or do you seriously believe Kazan, the capital of the Republic of Tartarstan, to be the "capital of Islamic culture," and Grozny, the capital of the Chechen Republic, to be the "capital of Russian culture?"

Not to be rude, but the majority of Russians aren't Muslim or Tartar or Chechen, and that is an unimpeachable fact.

Therefore, as you can imagine, it's rather challenging to believe any city currently located within the Russian Federation, namely Kazan, is central to Islamic culture, and that the capital of an ethno-religious minority republic within the Russian Federation, namely Grozny, is somehow central to Russian culture.

However, you do seem reasonably consistent, and as such sincere in your beliefs, so you're welcome to make your case regarding Kazan and Grozny in particular, and Russia and Islam in general.

However, as it stands, I'm afraid your claims concerning Kazan and Grozny are rather incredulous, if not outright surreal from my humble, if not ignorant perspective . . .
The strategic interest of Russia are with Jews and Gulf Monarchies. and the message is across the board not limited to these two cities.
I read this stuff so i know how those interests are implemented. even the beauty contests are not spared. every success has the religion inserted.

1740576207593.png
 

doggydogdo

Junior Member
Registered Member
Is that why Egypt and Jordan are so hostile to accepting more Palestinian refugees, even though they effectively received US bribes . . . I mean aid . . . measured in the $ billions over the decades for taking in Palestinian refugees and for making peace (at least temporarily) with Israel?

Is that also why the GCC sheikhdoms have by and far, for decades, rejected Palestinian refugees in general, minus perhaps the most capable and educated of Palestine and Palestinian descent?

No offense, but I don't really care for or between Israel and Palestine. Just not my problem.

However, there's a reason why even the Palestinians' fellow Arabs are rather thoroughly unsure if they can welcome (more) Palestinians.

Frankly, it's a tragedy, but just more reason for the Palestinians and Israelis to sort out their differences themselves.
The reason why they don't is because if they do take Palestinian refugees that would be the end of Palestine, and it would be taken over by Israelis. It's a political reason, not one showing that Palestinians are bad people.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Dude was friends with Varg Vikernes, so there is a pretty good chance he is also a nazi no matter how much they try to offer plausible deniability with the name.


Disagree, because first, israel will subvert China at the first chance it gets if it suits them and there is also the fact that a lot of israeli citizens are also american citizens.
I mean they run into the same issue subverting China as Indians run into subverting US. So that's not really a serious concern.
Zionism is an evil ideology
Yes
that threatens all of humanity. I suggest you read a little into their ideology and what they think of gentiles.
But the common point between zionism and hindutva is that even through they are evil and would like to threaten humanity, they don't have the power to.

Peacetime power is mediated by transportation (ships, electronics, EVs, oil) and wartime power is mediated by industry + innovation (I.e. number of science publications, engineers).

If you own Asia, you have the monopoly on both peace and wartime power. There is no threat from some savages whether from middle east or subcontinent, no matter how much they beat their chests.
 

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Billion Indians have no spending money - report​




Check out their twitter
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Meanwhile BBC reporting on China.
View attachment 146446
Check out their twitter
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Interesting that BBC didn't change its editorial stance on India after getting its USAID and NED funds cut ;)
Wanna know something funny.

Despite India being poor, things aren't cheap over there. They keep saying it's ok India has low cost of living. But relative to your salary etc things are quite expensive especially with all the tax being placed. In a way maybe it's more expensive than the west coz if you live upper middle class in say Europe you can still use the public infrastructure which is very good. In India you're def not gonna use that crap so be prepared to pay for overpriced taxis everyday so relatively speaking you're spending even more. It also costs more to buy iphones there than the west.

And imagine how bad it is for tourists. Apparently some crappy hotels somehow charge more than a decent hotel in say Guangzhou. Blows my mind how that's possible yet it is.
 
Last edited:
Top