Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Which firm and from which of those countries are going to build it? India? What's their expertise on HSR? America? They can't even finish the mearsed line on time and within budget, Saudi Arabia? By hiring China Railway Corporation to do the work sure. Who's going to finance this fantastical plan, U.S. Fed printing of $$$ that's going to go nicely with their already sky high interest rate for their debt.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
But the PH has bought Brahmos. They now have the power of Jai Hind Superpowah! Surely they have to be more powerful than Singapore?

But seriously, the PH have a track record of using deadly force to settle disputes with non-China counter claimants like Vietnam and Taiwan. The PH coast guard have shot and killed Vietnamese and Taiwanese fishermen. Even when both have far more powerful navies than the PH. What the US, Japan, and India hopes is that it can be empower the PH enough to cross that line into opening fire on Chinese fishermen. It may not escalate beyond a skirmish, but things can get quite messy between China and ASEAN after that. With full US encouragement.
I don't think so, but the possibility of violence is not improbable if Bong Marcos Jr. ignorantly assumes he can escape the Philippines unscathed to be with his family along with his deceased father's embezzled money parked in the U.S. and Swiss banks. Not to mention that the Philippines is actually not that enamored with the idea of going to war with China due to the decentralization of news from the help and proliferation of smartphones and social media like Tiktok, Facebook etc. Plus, Duterte the former president still has some sway within the Philippine political landscape.

If the China vs Philippines were happening a decade or two ago, then for sure, I am more than inclined to agree with your theory. But in today's social media landscape, the shaping of narrative has become more challenging and expensive for the western backed elites. Go ask @ansy1968 or @coolgod and other members of this forum who are from there and or frequent travelers to the island country.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
India fails again at diplomacy:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Wire
There is growing pessimism about a unanimous leaders declaration being adopted by the G20 at its summit in New Delhi this weekend, after the G20 Sherpas, who met at Nuh in Haryana from Monday to Wednesday, failed to reach a consensus. The United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and other Western nations refused to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in order to make it acceptable to Russia and China,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Deccan Herald.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
has reported quoting a senior EU official who said that the text drafted by India on the Ukraine war did “not go far enough” to be accepted by G7 and EU members.
External affairs minister S. Jaishankar met Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Jakarta on Wednesday on the sidelines of the East Asia Summit to discuss the impasse about the declaration to be adopted by the G20 leaders in New Delhi. The meeting was reportedly held to seek Lavrov’s intervention to end the impasse, which would give India the ignominious distinction of becoming the first country, under whose presidency a leaders’ declaration could not be issued. In the year-long Indian presidency, there have been no joint communique from any ministerial or official meetings of the grouping that were held in India.

A unanimous declaration is seen as the minimum bar for any summit to be not declared a failure. With Chinese President Xi Jinping choosing not to attend the summit, the event has already been robbed of much of its sheen. A failure to issue a declaration would reflect poorly on India globally, and especially on PM Narendra Modi, who has tried to showcase the routine rotational presidency of G20 as a huge diplomatic achievement.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't know what kind of economic data those idiots are looking at honestly, and frankly I don't give a toss.
The strategic approaches of America and the west are as follows:

  • Politically, economically isolate China
  • Weaken it's economy through every possible means as well as cognition or cognitive attack
  • Weak economy = weak military
  • Weak economy = social unrest/instability
  • Weak economy = 5th element can gather enough disgruntled people to possibly rise up leading to the western wetdreams of government collapse.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
The point is to apply pressure to Apple board members and shareholders ie the American elites who can then use their puppets in congress to sideline the china hawks.
They can either continue to believe the neocon lie of Repeating 1842 or deal with reality of watching their market share dwindle at the same rate as their moving factories out of China.
Foxconn/Hon Hai Precision Industries manufactures Apple products but cannot claim a major share in the profits from their sale, since Apple holds the intellectual knowledge and property rights. Roughly, Apple gets 31% of the profits from an iPhone sale, Foxconn less than 2%. It's the "most valuable company in the world" for a reason.

Apple's valuation also underpins a 10% chunk of NASDAQ and a big share of US retirement portfolios. Plenty of ammo to use there.

The reality is that phasing out Apple with domestic competitors will bring a lot more money back to China.

News of the ban comes right ahead of an Apple event next week, at which Apple is expected to launch a new line of iPhones and other Apple products.
 
Last edited:

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Anybody notice recently that the media is has had a multi-fold increase on China's economy is doomed narratives? I wonder why...?
Because the US has more or less defaulted on its debt by taking interest from US treasuries owed to Japan and reinvesting it back into US treasuries, whilst allowing the quid pro quo of providing political cover for Japan dumping Fukushima nuclear contaminated water. Japan had apparently wanted to use that US interest to save its currency but the Anglos are facing down dedollarisation.

it’s typical Anglo projection, look at what they doth protest too much and apply it to themselves to see the truth, be it NSA prism spying and witch hunts against Huawei, stuxnet etc
 
Top