They act like MSS can't get this info in their sleep.
They act like MSS can't get this info in their sleep.
Nah, India is worse. They have nothing going for them aside from the sheer population size but that alone is not enough, it can actually transform into a grave burden if they don't take advantage of the population boom (the window is rapidly closing).Japan is tier 2 as they come. Even India is better than Japan in many ways due to sheer size but no other redeeming traits otherwise. It was always true.
I am more bullish on India than most people here. Still for the foreseeable future it won't be China. If demographics is everything, why Egypt didn't pass Germany?Nah, India is worse. They have nothing going for them aside from the sheer population size but that alone is not enough, it can actually transform into a grave burden if they don't take advantage of the population boom (the window is rapidly closing).
Japan's nominal GDP increased from $1.3T in 1984 to $3.2T 1990, impressive at how rapidly Japan was able to increase their national power during that time, they became even more powerful than the USSR! Japan must've really put in place some great policies in 1985 to increase their national power so quickly.Whether they have some dying industries or not doesn't matter. The official ranking by nominal GDP is widely regarded as a ranking of national power. It will be a shock to the national psyche of Japan to drop out of the top three. They will start to finally recognise their decline. Abe said Japan will never be a tier two nation, once they're number 4 they will officially be tier two. Prepare yourself for the headlines once 2023 GDP numbers are out. 2023 H1 should show it already
What is it with Yahoo these days with the based comment sections?
What is it with Yahoo these days with the based comment sections?
The United States is the very Anti-Christ their religious fanatics feared, preaching democracy and human rights but doing the very opposite 24/7.
The representative of the to make a number of points at the on Haiti that should have been made by CARICOM. He stated among other things, “Systemic crisis in Haiti was preceded by many years of destructive external interference both through direct interventions and politically engineered manipulation. The vicious practice of imposing alien political models on Haiti that disregard national political interests of the country eroded the fragile foundations of Haitian statehood…..” and “We don’t quite understand why, with a stalled political dialogue and crisis of legitimacy, with no control over weapons trafficking and an underfunded humanitarian plan, the idea of sending a multinational military force to Haiti is seen by some stakeholders as a cure-all solution to all Haiti’s problems. The history of external interventions in Haiti shows that externally imposed models do not take root in Haitian society. They bring much more trouble than good and serve only as a cover for promoting the interests of other nations. It is no coincidence that even now, despite all the problems, there are voices in Haiti against any form of foreign interference. It is our duty to listen to those voices rather than try to silence or ignore them”. Not surprisingly, the UN secretariat omitted these comments in their of the Security Council briefing.
Chinese ambassador Zhang Jun was also very skeptical about the appropriateness of sending a military force to Haiti.
"We have heard many speeches in support of this force, but no country announcing concrete actions. For this reason, it seems that more in-depth studies are going to be necessary before arriving at a viable proposal," he said, emphasizing that Haitians must decide on their own destiny.
I am also very bull-ish on Akhand BharatI am more bullish on India than most people here. Still for the foreseeable future it won't be China. If demographics is everything, why Egypt didn't pass Germany?
Nah. India will never become like China. India is just not China. When China was rising fast, nobody said that China will become a much larger Japan. India is a South Asian nation, while China is an East Asian nation. Comparing India and China is like comparing Nigeria and Brazil. Two developing countries of roughly similar populations, but with very different geographical, cultural, historical, and economic circumstances.I am more bullish on India than most people here. Still for the foreseeable future it won't be China. If demographics is everything, why Egypt didn't pass Germany?