FN-6 in use in Syria

Black Shark

Junior Member
This passage from Jane's article should alarm the Russian military helicopter sales force.

That does not raise any concerns about the self defense suite, it only raises the concerns how stupid some countries are to not buy proper self defense suite for their helicopters that are purchased for one reason for direct and rapid battle deployement like in Iraq case. They tried to safe money and did not upgrade even their Mi-28NE with MAWS sensors which now have to fly blind without pilots getting even an alert in case of incoming MANPADS. They were advized to purchase President-S Systems for at least Mi-28NE, but they tried to safe money now they are flying useless with LWR and RWR against MANPADS.
The Self Defense Suite on Mi-35M is good the problem is new MANPADS with Image Infrared seekers that can only be effectivley intercepted with DIRCM, IRCM like ADROS or any other IRCM have no effect on more modern seekers and flares are also filtered by the seeker as false target. Overall there is a big gap between Ukrainian helicopters that never recieved upgrades since late 1980s and the current Mi-35M or Mi-35M2 versions, just not comperable.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


it is a Ukrainian countermeasure system. didn't seem to work that well against Igla when used on Ukrainian Mi-24 either.

Through the Positioning of IRCM it also depends on which angle MANPADS are coming in. IRCM do cover 360° in azimuth and at least 35 or 60° in evelation but the rotor usually blocks 30° and leaves a blind spot.

Also like Soviets had experienced with early models of MANPADS such as Strela and Stinger, IRCM had shown effectiveness of 35% up to 70% for reducing the hit probability of MANPADS towards helicopters equipped with such device. Read full report is very interesting what beating the Hinds took up to 40mm HE-Frag grenades and survived sometimes.

Here is the link for that source.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I quote from it,

Для борьбы со "Стингерами" экипажи применяли стандартные средства: термоловушки и ЭВУ "Липа". Отстрел ловушек помагал слабо: ракета уводилась от вертолета всего в 27 % случаев, против, например, 54 % у той же "Стрелы". А с использованием ЭВУ 70 % ЗУР уходили на ИК импульс "Липы".
Кроме того, в этом случае дальность захвата ИК ГСН "Стингера" Ми-24 снижалась до 1800 м. По всей очевидности, ЭВУ, установленные на Ми-24, - одни из лучших в мире. В них температура выхлопных газов на выходе снижается до 370 грд, а струя от нсущего винта, кроме того, размывая, снижала почти вдвое контрастность машины.

Short translation, For fighting with "Stingers" the crew used standardized equipment: IRCM "Lipa".
Using flares was a weak help: Missile was deflected from the Helicopter in only 27% of the time, against for example 54% deflecting of the "Strela" (older). With the help of IRCM the rate was 70% from the IRCM impulses.
All Mi-24 were equipped with IR-suppressors, the best of its kind in the world (during that time).
Also, in this case the lockon capability of Stingers fell beneath 1800m against Mi-24. The exhaust gases temperature with use of IR suppressors fell down to 370° C, deflecting the hot air with the main rotor and blurring out the ir contrast of the helicopter by two times.

Note here is that the IR suppressors reduce the exhaust gases from roughly 940-1060° Celsius to 370° C (afghanistan conditions) which is the same level as Blackhole IR Suppressors on Apaches which reduce 860° C to 320-360° C.

Flares is the first line of defense. The Apaches & Ospreys are some that use them.

Flares are more helpful when starting to flare and entering an enemy zone to make it difficult for MANPAD operator to lockon instead of trying an already locked MANPAD to intercept with Flares, this tactics were used in Afghanistan were MAWS did not exist and they increased survivability greatly, but flares are not special there are no helicopters that are involved in combat without flares.
 

shen

Senior Member
That does not raise any concerns about the self defense suite, it only raises the concerns how stupid some countries are to not buy proper self defense suite for their helicopters that are purchased for one reason for direct and rapid battle deployement like in Iraq case. They tried to safe money and did not upgrade even their Mi-28NE with MAWS sensors which now have to fly blind without pilots getting even an alert in case of incoming MANPADS. They were advized to purchase President-S Systems for at least Mi-28NE, but they tried to safe money now they are flying useless with LWR and RWR against MANPADS.
The Self Defense Suite on Mi-35M is good the problem is new MANPADS with Image Infrared seekers that can only be effectivley intercepted with DIRCM, IRCM like ADROS or any other IRCM have no effect on more modern seekers and flares are also filtered by the seeker as false target. Overall there is a big gap between Ukrainian helicopters that never recieved upgrades since late 1980s and the current Mi-35M or Mi-35M2 versions, just not comperable.



Through the Positioning of IRCM it also depends on which angle MANPADS are coming in. IRCM do cover 360° in azimuth and at least 35 or 60° in evelation but the rotor usually blocks 30° and leaves a blind spot.

Also like Soviets had experienced with early models of MANPADS such as Strela and Stinger, IRCM had shown effectiveness of 35% up to 70% for reducing the hit probability of MANPADS towards helicopters equipped with such device. Read full report is very interesting what beating the Hinds took up to 40mm HE-Frag grenades and survived sometimes.

Here is the link for that source.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I quote from it,



Short translation, For fighting with "Stingers" the crew used standardized equipment: IRCM "Lipa".
Using flares was a weak help: Missile was deflected from the Helicopter in only 27% of the time, against for example 54% deflecting of the "Strela" (older). With the help of IRCM the rate was 70% from the IRCM impulses.
All Mi-24 were equipped with IR-suppressors, the best of its kind in the world (during that time).
Also, in this case the lockon capability of Stingers fell beneath 1800m against Mi-24. The exhaust gases temperature with use of IR suppressors fell down to 370° C, deflecting the hot air with the main rotor and blurring out the ir contrast of the helicopter by two times.

Note here is that the IR suppressors reduce the exhaust gases from roughly 940-1060° Celsius to 370° C (afghanistan conditions) which is the same level as Blackhole IR Suppressors on Apaches which reduce 860° C to 320-360° C.



Flares are more helpful when starting to flare and entering an enemy zone to make it difficult for MANPAD operator to lockon instead of trying an already locked MANPAD to intercept with Flares, this tactics were used in Afghanistan were MAWS did not exist and they increased survivability greatly, but flares are not special there are no helicopters that are involved in combat without flares.

Black Shark, good information.
Ironically, one of the sales pitch used by Adron is that their IR jammer don't need expensive missile launch detectors to work. Well, true, but it is always a good idea to give the pilot warning of missile launch. Maybe the Iraqi believe that sales pitch.
While Soviet L-166 family and American ALQ-144 IRCM were successful when first introduced, modern MANPAD are specifically designed to counter this type of countermeasure. NATO forces are moving to DIRCM even before imaging IR missiles are common, suggesting that modulated IRCM are no longer effective against the late models of scanning seeker missiles such as Igla.
 

shen

Senior Member
Doubt it, the terrorist has to get close enough within MANPAD range in order to be effective, by than that means they're already at the airport zone, therefore security personal would've have caught them. The airplane has to be either during take off or landing to be within that MANPAD kill zone.

FN-6 has a 6000m range 3500m ceiling though, I've seen airliners in landing approach well inside those parameter.
ISIS seems more interested in carving out their caliphate, so they may hold onto the missiles they have for combat. Let's hope the AQ type groups, who give priority to western targets, don't get their hands on one.
And China may need to reconsider supplying additional MANPAD to Sudan, who seems to have no qualm about reselling them through Qartar to dangerous terrorists.
 
Last edited:

no_name

Colonel
Doubt it, the terrorist has to get close enough within MANPAD range in order to be effective, by than that means they're already at the airport zone, therefore security personal would've have caught them. The airplane has to be either during take off or landing to be within that MANPAD kill zone.

Many airports are by the coast and have their runways extend out to sea, so it's not unfeasible that the terrorists may rent a boat some distance out.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Many airports are by the coast and have their runways extend out to sea, so it's not unfeasible that the terrorists may rent a boat some distance out.

True, but airports by the coast has coastal securities as well. Plus terrorists on boats using MANPADS has to be on very good weather with very calm seas in order to be stable enough to track the target and keep it on track before firing. By that time security would have spotted the suspicious vessel than.
 

indochina

New Member
Anyone with information Iraqi Mi-35M is equipped with KT-01 IRCM ? In addition, KT-01's IRCM systems of manufacturing production Ukraine, not Russia. ALQ-144 IRCM also met defeat by SA-7 older manpads in Iraq. AH-64D was shot down by SA-7. Ukraine Mi-24 is equipped with KT-01 also has been shot down by manpads (Igla-1 or Igla-S) is run by Pro-Russian
 
Last edited:

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Much of the Syrian city's are rumble and a perfect setting for the infantry worst nightmare the sniper

A well trained sniper can pin down a entire company and they are very well suited in destroyed areas

However I have not read much about the successful use of snipers in the Syrian war

Afghanistan has seen many sniper kills both by Taliban and Coalition forces
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


@asif iqbal
We know there are wide spread sniper operations in syria, They just don't have the press. In Afghanistan US Forces and NATO were fighting losses were headline news victories were headline news. In Syria it's so messed up with factions on factions everywhere it's mad max so sniper stories are getting lost in the fold as the press is to scared to go.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Black Shark

Junior Member
Anyone with information Iraqi Mi-35M is equipped with KT-01 IRCM ? In addition, KT-01's IRCM systems of manufacturing production Ukraine, not Russia. ALQ-144 IRCM also met defeat by SA-7 older manpads in Iraq. AH-64D was shot down by SA-7. Ukraine Mi-24 is equipped with KT-01 also has been shot down by manpads (Igla-1 or Igla-S) is run by Pro-Russian

Have no information other than the iraqi Mi-35 being equipped with L-166A1/L1 IRCM which are not the newest, there are some other versions but cost far more, they are also more modern and better modulated in the IR emission to match against newer missiles better than the older IRCMs.
Ukraine has almost not a single Mi-24 that has any newer upgrade seen than from 1988. There are maybe 18-20 Mi-24 that have some upgrades, which still no idea if they are equipped with KT-01 since it was a equipment to make money for exports, but all the rest are on late 80s standard.
 

Broccoli

Senior Member
IS released video where they show them using FN-6.
[video=youtube;9veSMG7dMd0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9veSMG7dMd0[/video]
 
Top