F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

oh no LOL!
You've reached your free article limit.
Subscribe now to get unlimited access.

can't see more than "The House panel that approves defense spending intends to withhold half of next year’s funding for F-35 spare parts until the Pentagon and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
agree on the sale of technical data for spare parts to improve the tracking of items and allow purchases from other suppliers."
F-35 Spare Parts Funding at Risk as Pentagon Seeks Data Rights
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


May 20, 2019, 5:36 PM GMT+2
  • House panel plans to hold back $364 million of $728 million
  • Next-generation jet has been plagued by parts issues worldwide
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
You've reached your free article limit.
Subscribe now to get unlimited access.

Here you are Jura;

The House panel that approves defense spending intends to withhold half of next year’s funding for F-35 spare parts until the Pentagon and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
agree on the sale of technical data for spare parts to improve the tracking of items and allow purchases from other suppliers.

Struggling to resolve spare parts shortages and bottlenecks for the fighter plane worldwide, the Defense Department this month requested that Lockheed offer a proposal to sell it cost and technical data rights to the parts. That would give the Pentagon the ability to seek its own suppliers for parts or even produce some at its maintenance depots.

But the panel said the department has yet to hear back from Lockheed, the No. 1 U.S. defense contractor.

With the issue unresolved, the House Appropriations Defense subcommittee said it will only allow spending of $364 million of $728 million requested for Navy and Marine Corps jet parts in fiscal year 2020 until the Pentagon has “received an adequate cost proposal” from Lockheed.

“I assume Lockheed Martin will fight this as consensus growth expectations for the company include a healthy increase in revenues from sustaining the F-35 fleet,” said Byron Callan, a defense analyst with Capital Alpha Partners. “If the government gets data rights they can compete spares and software or do some of this at their own depots and software labs.”

The F-35 parts restriction is in a report by the panel expected to be released on Monday. It was included in a draft obtained by Bloomberg Government.

The Pentagon’s inability to provide adequate spare parts for the F-35 has hamstrung the jet’s operations around the world, the Government Accountability Office reported
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. With a backlog of 4,300 parts for F-35s, the supply chain issues meant that the planes couldn’t fly almost 30% of the time during a seven-month period last year, according to the GAO.

The full House Appropriations committee is expected to adopt the panel’s bill and its report as soon as Tuesday. Senate appropriators have yet to act on their version of the spending measure for the year that begins Oct 1. A Senate Armed Services subcommittee is likely to review the parts provision this week as it draws up the companion defense policy bill. The parts provision is likely to be contested by Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed, analysts said.

Possessing the data rights “would put pricing pressure on Lockheed Martin,” said Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with the Teal Group. “There are other challenges to doing this, but just getting access to the data rights would be a big first step.”

The House panel said until a request from Lockheed is submitted “it lacks full confidence” the $728 million “will be used efficiently.” The panel said acquiring cost and technical data is a “necessary step” to solving the issues GAO outlined.

Lockheed spokeswoman Carolyn Nelson didn’t have an immediate comment on the House panel’s proposal.

— With assistance by Travis J Tritten
 
Navy Deactivates VFA-101 Grim Reapers, Consolidates F-35Cs at NAS Lemoore
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

quit reading after after the sixth or so paragraph, jumped into the last one which is:
Understanding what’s at stake as the F-35C community continues to mature and prepares for its first operational deployment, Kelley told USNI News, “we’re excited about the integration. And as we move forward, there’s some challenges, no doubt. How do we integrate this appropriately? How do we use all the capabilities that the F-35 has, so that we can move forward with the carrier air wing of the future?”
 

gelgoog

Brigadier
Registered Member
oh no LOL!
You've reached your free article limit.
Subscribe now to get unlimited access.

...

Just open a new browser in incognito mode and read it. These sites use cookies to prevent you from reading more than a certain amount of articles.
Incognito mode has a clear cookie cache when it starts up.
 
in case you didn't know
Number of F-35s Built for USAF Eclipses Number of F-22s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

5/24/2019
Lockheed Martin delivered its 196th F-35A Joint Strike Fighter to the Air Force this week, surpassing the total of 195 F-22s—test and production—that it delivered to the service between 1996 and 2011.

The 196th F-35 will be based at Hill AFB, Utah, home of the first operational USAF F-35 squadrons. The first F-35A was delivered to the Air Force in 2006.

More than 395 F-35s have been built, including variants produced for the Marine Corps, Navy, and foreign partners and customers.

The Air Force is sticking to its production goal of 1,763 F-35s to replace the F-117, F-16, and A-10, and the US services collectively plan to buy over 2,600 of the fighters. More than 790 pilots have been trained to fly the strike fighter, which has accumulated a fleet total of over 195,000 flying hours. Counting all variants, the F-35 flies out of 17 bases.

The Air Force plans to buy at least 48 F-35s in fiscal 2020, and Congress may add another 12 airplanes to that total.
 
was now jumping through
Published on May 22, 2019
Two U.S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II strike fighters takeoff, with full weapons load-out, from Al Dhafra Air Base, United Arab Emirates. Filmed May 2019. Film Credits: Video by Staff Sgt. Christopher Thornbury, 380th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
 

Brumby

Major
Even After Achieving IOC, Questions Continue to Surround Navy’s F-35C

I am only reproducing the pertinent comment as to why the USN seems to prefer the F-18. While the reasons cited are valid, none of them are solid reasons and even collectively they don't offer a strong case.
Of the three JSF variants, the F-35C is the one that is “not in a particularly good place,” said Richard Aboulafia, Teal Group’s vice president of analysis.
Aboulafia said he believes that, though the Navy is going ahead with purchasing the aircraft, the sea service isn’t enthusiastic about the F-35C. He noted that the Navy wants to keep buying the F-35C’s predecessor, the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, and that appetite hasn’t seemed to diminish as the F-35C finally reaches IOC.
The Navy has a lot of reasons to hedge its bets, he argued.
“Why pay the up-front price at all — rather than wait for someone else to drive down the cost?” he said, also noting that the Navy “is less convinced themselves that [the F-35C] has much value at sea. There’s also an institutional preference for twin-engine fighters.”
Aboulafia also claimed the F-35C could diminish the Navy’s case for large-deck carriers. “If the [F35B] works, and Marines deploy Bs and Cs together and the difference isn’t all that great, then you have a situation where the case for large carriers is a little undercut,” he said.
In a worst-case scenario — at least for a sea service that wants to keep operating a fleet of large aircraft carriers — the Navy could lose support for even a carrier fleet of 10 ships and see an argument for smaller carriers supplemented by amphibious ships gain a lot of steam, Aboulafia argued.
Though many have expressed doubts about the Navy’s enthusiasm about the F-35C, the service has continued to publicly and emphatically support the fighter. The Navy argues that the F-35C offers the latest in technology and is perfectly suited to fight a modern war.
“The F-35C is ready for operations, ready for combat and ready to win,” the commander of Naval Air Forces, Vice Adm. DeWolfe Miller, said in a statement following the declaration of the fighter’s IOC. “We are adding an incredible weapon system into the arsenal of our carrier strike groups that significantly enhances the capability of the joint force.”
Capt. Max McCoy, commodore of the Navy’s Joint Strike Fighter Wing, predicted that the F-35C would make us “more combat effective than ever before.”
“We will continue to learn and improve ways to maintain and sustain F-35C as we prepare for first deployment,” McCoy added in a statement. “The addition of F-35C to existing carrier air wing capability ensures that we can fight and win in contested battlespace now and well into the future.”
 
Top