F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Land why is that “Jura the Elder”?
It seems based on this report that some critics have jumped ship. Most of the scoring by the pilots was fairly favorable, although there were some criticisms as well. It seemed like a fair no Bull assessment.
 
Land why is that “Jura the Elder”?
It seems based on this report that some critics have jumped ship. Most of the scoring by the pilots was fairly favorable, although there were some criticisms as well. It seemed like a fair no Bull assessment.
well I was sorta disappointed not see jaw-dropping several-dozen-to-zero kill ratio in the report Today at 12:41 AM LOL

or did I just miss it?
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Ah yes your obsession.
Exercise numbers given without context regarding how they were calculated.

Without context it was click bait. I hope that one day soon we will get an interview with the participants of that exercise and learn the ROE and how the simulation played out and numbers were calculated. How many spawned how many sorties were flown. It would wonderful just to get you to finally drop it.
 
Ah yes your obsession.
Exercise numbers given without context regarding how they were calculated.

Without context it was click bait. I hope that one day soon we will get an interview with the participants of that exercise and learn the ROE and how the simulation played out and numbers were calculated. How many spawned how many sorties were flown. It would wonderful just to get you to finally drop it.
drop? with the new software drop, I expect those kill ratios to get even higher, I'd like to see how ridiculous spin doctors will get LOL
 
No @Jura i wasn’t talking about the numbers. I was talking about your life. I just imagine every night you wake up in a cold sweat ranting about the kill to loss ratios of a Red-flag exercise years ago.
LOL! I think it's in fact F-35 fanbois doing 'Pew! Pew! Pew!' while asleep, having an unprecedented level of situational awareness and sensor fusion enabled by the game-changer in their ecosystem
 

Brumby

Major
yeah the same author (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) as in Mar 30, 2017

You are making a superficial argument with no legs. The nature of both articles are simply associative because they relate to the F-35. Beyond that the respective articles are mutually independent in content as the most recent article is about an updated first hand account of the F-35 capabilities and the other is about strategic pacing of the F-35 relative to overall size mix. Please articulate (with reasoning) why they are mutually (by your logic) necessarily self defeating.
 
You are making a superficial argument with no legs. The nature of both articles are simply associative because they relate to the F-35. Beyond that the respective articles are mutually independent in content as the most recent article is about an updated first hand account of the F-35 capabilities and the other is about strategic pacing of the F-35 relative to overall size mix. Please articulate (with reasoning) why they are mutually (by your logic) necessarily self defeating.
have you even read what I linked??

it's
"John Venable, a senior research fellow for defense policy at the Heritage Foundation who helped craft the proposal, told reporters during a private breakfast Tuesday morning that the decrease in the Air Force's purchase plan for F-35As would free up money for different acquisition programs within the service."
inside Mar 30, 2017

and now (Yesterday at 12:41 AM) the headline is
The F-35A Fighter Is the Most Dominant and Lethal Multi-Role Weapons System in the World: Now Is the Time to Ramp Up Production

so I concluded Yesterday at 7:16 AM
yeah the same author (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) as in Mar 30, 2017

if you still couldn't see a contradiction between that 2017 sentence and the recent headline, both related to the same author, please let me know LOL
 
Top