F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
you can tell me more about this gadget :)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It is a handheld device that emits the tracking elements of G2A and A2A weapons that are targeting the F-35, by providing an active signal, it confirms or denies that your EW suit is number one picking up the threat, and two that it is defending against that threat, by walking around the aircraft with the emitter you confirm that your defensive systems are actively hot, and allows your countermeasures to activate and gives you a test of those systems and how they would respond to a given threat from each threat vector?
 

Brumby

Major
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Key Points
  • The Pentagon's new sixth-generation engine will be built for the F-35 and several other aircraft
  • The new engine would be 35% more fuel efficient than existing engines, extending the range of US aircraft significantly
The Pentagon's developmental sixth-generation jet engine featuring greater fuel efficiency and thrust than existing military engines is initially being built for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), a senior agency official said on 17 March.
 
I don't know anything about EW but an OTA cyber-attack capability that doesn't "degrade the signature" of the plane sounds pretty cool. And of course being a pod weapon I imagine it can work on planes other than the F-35:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


F-35 programme begins developing cyber-attack capability

Marina Malenic, Washington, DC - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
18 March 2015

Key Points
The F-35 programme is developing a pod-mounted cyber-attack system
The offensive system is in the "prototyping phase", according to the deputy programme manager
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter programme is developing a pod-mounted cyber-attack system as it continues kinetic weapons integration, the deputy programme executive officer said on 17 March.

"Industry is developing a pod that would not degrade the signature of the airplane," said Rear Admiral Randy Mahr at the Precision Strike Association conference in Springfield, Virginia. He told IHS Jane's that the offensive system was in the "prototyping phase" and was not being designed by F-35 prime contractor Lockheed Martin, but declined to name the developer.

Meanwhile, Rear Adm Mahr said, the short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) B-model of the aircraft would be able to accommodate the Raytheon GBU-53/B Small Diameter Bomb Increment II (SDB II).

Some media reports have suggested that the weapon cannot be carried in the weapons bay of the F-35B - the smallest of the three variants - because the aircraft body contains a liftfan.

"SDB II will fit in the F-35B," Rear Adm Mahr said. "We have to move one hydraulic line and one wire bundle about a half-inch each to make it fit".

He noted that SDB II was still in development and would not even be ready for integration until Block IV of the F-35 programme was complete.

To read the full article, Client Login
(257 of 385 words)
 
found more on the pricing:
UPDATE 1-Pentagon report sees drop in cost of Lockheed F-35, other weapons
The Pentagon on Thursday lowered the projected procurement cost of Lockheed Martin Corp's F-35 fighter jet by almost two percent and officials vowed to keep trimming the cost of the largest U.S. arms program.

The U.S. Defense Department's annual report on weapons programs forecast it would cost $391.1 billion to buy 2,457 F-35 jets. That represents a drop of $7.5 billion, or 1.9 percent, from last year's estimate, due to lower labor and estimated inflation rates, and a cut in the number of spares needed.

The report said the net cost of 79 major U.S. arms programs dropped 0.6 percent, or $9.1 billion, to $1.6 trillion, reflecting ongoing efforts to cut costs, improve oversight and keep programs on schedule.

Lockheed and the Pentagon's F-35 program office welcomed the lower cost estimate for the stealthy new warplanes and said they were continuing efforts to cut costs further.

The F-35 program office said its estimate of the cost to operate and maintain the jets through 2065 fell almost $58 billion to $859 billion in 2014, below the unchanged $1.02 trillion estimate of the Pentagon's Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office.

Lockheed's F-35 program manager Lorraine Martin said the lower forecast was the result of "a laser focus" by the government and all companies involved on cutting costs, improving quality in manufacturing, getter parts faster and reducing design changes.

"We aren't stopping here," Martin said in a statement. "We have numerous initiatives in place ... that will drive program costs even lower allowing us to provide ... a fifth-generation F-35 jet at a fourth-generation price by the end of the decade."

The report put the average procurement cost of each F-35 fighter at $135.7 million, including inflation, over the life of the program. Adding in research, development and military infrastructure, the cost was $159.2 million per jet.

The F-35 program office said the actual cost of jets and engines bought from Lockheed and engine maker Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United Technologies Corp, was coming down each year and remained well below government estimates.

Under the eighth set of production contracts, each conventional takeoff A-model jet and engine cost $108 million, down from $112 million, while the cost of the B-model jet, which can take off and land like a helicopter, dropped to $134 million from $139 million, it said.

The Navy version of the jet, which can land on an aircraft carrier, dropped to $129 million from $130 million, the program office said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
am just reporting ...
Software Glitch Causes F-35 to Incorrectly Detect Targets in Formation
Engineers are trying to fix the F-35’s software package after it was discovered the sensors for the Joint Strike Fighter malfunction when detecting targets when the aircraft flies in formation.

Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, Program Executive Officer, F-35, said he didn’t have a date when the correction would be made. However, he said the problem would not delay the declaration of the Marine variant of the aircraft, the F-35B, ready for combat.

“When you have two, three or four F-35s looking at the same threat, they don’t all see it exactly the same because of the angles that they are looking at and what their sensors pick up,” Bogdan told reporters Tuesday. “When there is a slight difference in what those four airplanes might be seeing, the fusion model can’t decide if it’s one threat or more than one threat. If two airplanes are looking at the same thing, they see it slightly differently because of the physics of it.”

For example, if a group of F-35s detect a single ground threat such as anti-aircraft weaponry, the sensors on the planes may have trouble distinguishing whether it was an isolated threat or several objects, Bogdan explained.

As a result, F-35 engineers are working with Navy experts and academics from John’s Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory to adjust the sensitivity of the fusion algorithms for the JSF’s 2B software package so that groups of planes can correctly identify or discern threats.

“What we want to have happen is no matter which airplane is picking up the threat – whatever the angles or the sensors – they correctly identify a single threat and then pass that information to all four airplanes so that all four airplanes are looking at the same threat at the same place,” Bogdan said.

The F-35 is engineered to fuse relevant information from a variety of sources into one common operating picture for the pilot to view – such as digital maps, radar information and sensor information all combined into a single set of screens, JSF officials said.

The F-35’s Electro-Optical Target System, or EOTS, is an infra-red sensor able to assist pilots with air and ground targeting at increased standoff ranges while also performing laser designation, laser range-finding and other tasks.

In addition, the plane’s Distributed Aperture System, or DAS, is a series of six electro-optical sensors able to give information to the pilot. The DAS includes precision tracking, fire control capabilities and the ability to warn the pilot of an approaching threat or missile.

The F-35s also have an Active Electronically Scanned Array Radar which is able to track a host of electromagnetic signals, including returns from Synthetic Aperture Radar, or SAR. SAR paints a picture of the contours of the ground or surrounding terrain and Ground Moving Target Indicator, or GMTI, locates something on-the-move-on the ground and airborne objects or threats.

Overall, information from all of the JSF sensors is fused through the aircraft’s computer, providing the pilot with clear, integrated view of the battlefield. The aircraft also have a data link enabling them to share information with one another in real time.

The F-35 software, which shows images on display screens in the cockpit as well as on a pilot’s helmet-mounted-display, is designed to fuse results from various radar capabilities onto a single screen for the pilot.

The Marine Corps plans to declare their short-take-off-and-landing F-35B variant ready for combat by June of this year by declaring what’s called Initial Operating Capability, or IOC, with the 2B version of the software.

Software Block 2B, while still short of the full final 3F software configuration, can provide data link capabilities and early fused sensor integration, program officials have said.

Block 2B you can provide basic close air support and fire an AMRAAM (Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile}, JDAM [Joint Direct Attack Munition] or GBU 12 [laser-guided aerial bomb], JSF program officials said.

“We will declare IOC with an older version of the software that does not have all the fixes in it. They (Marine Corps) have ways of mitigating those problems which they feel are sufficient for them to go to war,” Bogdan said.

Bogdan explained how F-35B pilots will be able to use concepts of operation to work around the sensor fusion problems until the software fixes are in place. Some of these tactics could include turning off certain sensors or flying in groups of two instead of four planes, Bogdan explained.

“We want to fix this so it is inherent in the airplane. We have always said that fusion was going to be tough. We are going to work through this,” Bogdan said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Brumby

Major
am just reporting ...
Software Glitch Causes F-35 to Incorrectly Detect Targets in Formation

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The article IMHO is incorrectly representing the nature of the problem. It is not a software problem but simply a geospatial location issue when you have a flight formation of two or more planes (nodes) in this case where there is spatial displacement. In a single plane formation, the data is simply fused in a defaulted geospatial location but when there are more than one the solution in my view is to pre-designate master and hub nodes in a flight formation so that the data is fused within a designated master node to synchronise threat data by co-locating different geospatial references to a single reference location. It would require algorithm changes involving a step process when fusing data in a flight formation. In other words, the nodes are simply extension of the master node i.e. a master and slave relationship.
 
Top