F-22 Raptor Thread

I'd say so.
hey
The F-22 Fighter Jet Restart Is Dead: Study
Sorry, Raptor fans. As many expected, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
restart will never happen.

And the No. 1 reason is cost, according to a new study.

In a classified report submitted to Congress this month, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
estimated it would cost approximately "$50 billion to procure 194 additional F-22s, at an estimated cost of $206 million to $216 million per aircraft," officials told Military.com on Wednesday.

"The total includes an estimate of approximately $9.9 billion for non-recurring start-up costs and $40.4 billion for aircraft procurement costs," the service said.

Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson delivered the report to the congressional defense committees June 9. Last year, the House Armed Services Air and Land Forces subcommittee
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to issue a study of what it would take to reopen Lockheed Martin's F-22 production line.

"The Air Force has no plans restart the F-22 production line; it wouldn't make economic or operational sense to do so," according to a statement from Air Force spokeswoman Capt. Emily Grabowski.

The service instead has recommended applying resources to the "capability development plans outlined in the Air Superiority 2030 Enterprise Capability Collaboration Team Flight," she said.

Air Superiority 2030 is the plan to promote advanced fighter aircraft, sensors and weapons in a growing and unpredictable threat environment.

The potential F-22 project inevitably would have cost billions.

According to a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, restarting the F-22 production line to build just 75 more jets would have cost about $20 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars.

Part of the reason is that the service would be building a new, modern Raptor -- not a 1990s version.

"You're not building the same airplane you were building before, and it becomes a much more expensive proposition," a defense analyst in Washington, D.C., told Military.com on background in March. "So do you build a new 'old' F-22, or do you build an improved one?" the analyst said.

In addition, Rand's figure was a rough estimate to restart production and build a small lot of planes. It didn't take into account the cost of hiring workers, integrating newer stealth technologies, or training and equipping additional pilots.

So the message is clear: F-35 or bust.
source is Military.com
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
found in Twitter
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

DDUlBa5XgAECU8q.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





Great pic of F-22 flying over USS Lexington "The Blue Ghost," via
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
oh really?
USAF calls for drone defences after F-22 overflight
Small, civilian-owned drones can buzz past the US Air Force’s stealthy fighter fleet sitting at domestic bases and the service’s head of Air Combat Command (ACC) has no way to deal with them.

In the course of one day last week, the air force counted two reports of small drones interfering with operations at an ACC base, Gen Mike Holmes told an audience in Washington DC this week. In one incident, a Lockheed Martin F-22 almost collided with a small drone during its final approach and during another, a gate guard watched a drone fly over the top of a gate and tracked the vehicle as it flew over the flight line, Holmes says.

“I have no authority given to me by the government to deal with that,” he says. “Imagine a world where somebody flies a couple hundred of those and flies one down the intake of my F-22s with just a small weapon on it.”

While ACC has no authority to disable or track UAS near its bases, the air force’s nuclear sites are working on getting government approval for deal with gate-crashing drones. Earlier this year, the head of Global Strike Command lamented the complex web of government agencies that must approve a drone defence strategy.

“It’s not a military authority...it’s a civil authority that can the be executed by military forces,” Holmes says. “The rules are basically the same as if it were a civil aircraft. If it was a civil aircraft I could track it back to where it started from and I could admonish that pilot or take their license, where the small UAS is really hard to get after.”

The USAF will receive approval for the nuclear bases first and Holmes will request air force headquarters to extend those authorities beyond global strike assets, he says. The USAF has already issued requests for counter drone technologies and industry representatives are vocal about their offerings, but the service still needs to wait for approval.
source is FlightGlobal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top