Drawing First Blood (Tank V.S Tank)

grndpndr

Just Hatched
Registered Member
This is also my first post as well and if IRC someone said the chin tank had ERA armor?If this is so the armor isnt near as sophisticated as on the abrams.abrams armor as part of its composite nature has a ceramic laminated in the armor which protecs against all ATGMs as far as im aware at least from frontal atack.ERA armor on the other hand is vulnerable to tandem heat warheads which are even made for the old RPG which if memory serves will penetrate some 20 in of homogenous armor.

On the other hand i hve alot of belief in what lenin said ,quantity has a quality all is own!( would lso make a wild guess and ay if we re aware the chin tanks have laser blinding feature or some such thing countermeasures are in the works or already done.The DOD im sure is well aware china is a potential threat in the future.

By the wAy im GETTN BIT LONG IN THE TOOTH;old HAVNG SERVED WHEN THE m60a2/3 WERE THE MAINSTAYS
I WAS IN THE 82ND ABN ASSIGNED AS A tOW GUNNER AND co SNIPER AS WELL AS WITH THE 193 3/5 a cO (abn) THE CANAL ZONE.eVE BACK THEN THOUGHTHE 82ND HAD BETTER ARMOR THAN TODAY WHICH IS NONE.oN THE OTHR HAND THEruss AS ELL AS TH CHI LIKELY HAVE abn IVISONS COMPLETELY QUIPPD WITH bmp3S 100MM GUN 30MM AUTOCNNON AND 7.62 COAX AGANST THE 82DS ARMORED HUMVEES??i DONT THINK THE 82ND NYTHNHG IT USED TO BE THERE FAR SURPASSED BY THE RUSS ABNS MOBILITY/FIREPOWER.
 
Last edited:
Top