I feel that having multiple warheads would give China more warheads to retailiate in the event of a first strike that eliminattes a bulk of China's ICBM.
The remaining ICBM on mobile TEL or hidden in tunnels or below South China Sea and other waters China claims preeminence will have more warheads to pose a credible second strike deterrent.
I think this is important also since US withdrew from the Anti-Ballastic Missile Treaty in early 2000's, so developing MIRV technology will help circumvent Ballastic Missile Defense (ie. Aegis, SMP-3 etc..) which would minimize China's credible second strike capability.
BMD only works against single missiles, unless there is an Anti-Ballastic Missile technology that can hit multiple warheads (MIRV) that I don't know about...
The remaining ICBM on mobile TEL or hidden in tunnels or below South China Sea and other waters China claims preeminence will have more warheads to pose a credible second strike deterrent.
I think this is important also since US withdrew from the Anti-Ballastic Missile Treaty in early 2000's, so developing MIRV technology will help circumvent Ballastic Missile Defense (ie. Aegis, SMP-3 etc..) which would minimize China's credible second strike capability.
BMD only works against single missiles, unless there is an Anti-Ballastic Missile technology that can hit multiple warheads (MIRV) that I don't know about...