Controversial military strategies in 3 kingdom

vesicles

Colonel
"The romance of the 3 kingdoms" is one of the most classic Chinese novels. In fact, it has been classically listed as one of the top 4 Chinese novels in the history of China. It is famous for military and political strategies. The actual novel was written in the Ming dynasty and the story was based on true history that occurred 2000 years ago at the end of the Han dynasty, between 200 and 300 AD. Although the novel has made this time period very famous, the true historical events in this time period has always been well known and well-studied throughout Chinese history. In fact, how Chinese think and how Chinese strategize with allies and against enemies have been heavily influenced by what happened in this time period. So if you want to understand why Chinese do things in a certain way, you need to understand this time period. Thus, I thought it would be good to start a thread on the 3 kingdom, given that we are all interested in military strategies.

To begin, I would like to briefly describe the historical background of the 3 kingdom period. This was the end of Han dynasty. The last few emperors of the Han dynasty happened to die young, leaving their young sons to the throne. With no actual mature and grown figures to lead them, these little emperors depended heavily on the people they felt they could trust, their servants or the eunuchs. The power of the eunuchs became ever growing to the level that they became more powerful than the emperor. Then came the natural disasters, drought, flood, locust, etc. Then rebellions. With the weakened central govn't and the govn't's heavy dependence on the military to quench the rebellions, generals guarding various cities became warlords. Then several officials in the capital decided to ask the generals to fight the eunuchs. What they didn't know was that they had actually invited even more dangerous figures into their homes. The eunuchs were eliminated, but in their place, the generals who were invited to the capital became even worse than the eunuchs. Then more generals were invited to the capital to fight the initial waves of the generals. After a while, the power of the generals became so big than one of them, Cao Cao, took the emperor to his own power center and literally took all the power away from the emperor. The only thing left for the emperor was the actual physical form of the throne and nothing else. Cao Cao mainly had the North (Kingdom of Wei) and had two challengers: Liu Bei in the West (Kingdom of Shu) and Sun Quan in the South (Kingdom of Wu). Thus, 3 kingdoms or 3 states. The 3 states fought for political and military dominance for close to a century, forming and breaking alliances countless times. In the end, none of the 3 won. It was the son of the supreme commander of the kingdom of Wei, Sima Yi, (his name is Sima Zhao) took over the Wei kingdom and ultimately destroyed the other 2 kingdoms and unified China again and established the Jin dynasty, ending the 3 kingdom period.

OK, now comes the main topic of this thread: controversies. There have been numerous military strategies used by the main characters in this period that have been highly controversial. I will begin by listing a few:

1) Hua Rong Pass
This happened immediately after the battle of the Red Cliff (as depicted in the movies). to make thing easier, Wei attacked an alliance between Shu and Wu. Zhuge Liang, the military counsel of Shu, predicted that when Cao Cao, the leader of Wei, was defeated, he would take the route of Hua Rong Pass to escape. He then ordered one of his most capable general Guan Yu to set up an ambush at Hua Rong Pass. Guan Yu's ambush was successful and managed to stop Cao Cao. However, Guan Yu let Cao Cao go because Guan Yu serve under Cao Cao for 12 years before being reuniting with his blood brother Liu Bei (the leader of Shu).

Now, the question: was this a miscalculation by Zhuge Liang, or Zhuge liang intentionally sent Guan Yu so that Cao Cao could escape alive? Why would Zhuge Liang want to let Cao Cao go? Well, it turns out Shu was extremely weak at the time. Wei, led by Cao Cao, had almost all of Northern China and commanded 1.5 million troops. Wu, led by Sun Quan, occupied most of the southern China and had close to 100,000 troops. Shu, on the other hand, had no land at the time and had only a few thousand troops and 3 generals. Very pathetic indeed. Wu was forced to ally with Shu because their enemy was too strong. If Cao Cao was captured/killed in the battle, Wu would immediately turned to Shu and killed them off and Sun Quan would become the new emperor. Easy. Zhuge Liang knew this too well. He did not want to give Wu a chance to do this. Thus, keeping Cao Cao alive would force Wu to maintain alliance with Shu, thus keeping Shu alive and giving Shu a chance to develop.

2) Wei Yan's strategy to sneak attack Chang An
This happened at the beginning of Zhuge liang's first Norther expedition. At this time, Shu is already very strong. Although it just lost a major battle to Wu at Yi Ling and lost close to 750,000 troops, Zhuge Liang was able to mass and train close to 400,000 troops and was about to attack Wei from the Mountain of Qi. At the time, Zhuge Liang's strategy was a safe one: marching along the main roads and taking every city on the way, cross the river of Wei and take the city of Chang An. Chang An is the key because it is the last major city to the west of the capital city of Wei, Luo Yang. One of Zhuge Liang's general, Wei Yan, suggested that he could take 5000 troops and took the small roads all the way to Chang An. Without all the big cities and Passes in the way, he could get to Chang An in a day and attack Chang An. Chang An would not be able to mount any meaningful defense because no one would expect an attack and the general stationed at Chang An was a spoiled prince, nothing more. Zhuge Liang did not agree and brushed his idea aside. His opinion is that, although the plan is ambitious, it is way dangerous. What if someone cut them off? Since Wei Yan would be leading only a small force, there would be no reinforcement, no supply, nothing except what they would bring with them. If there was a smart defender, he would send a troop to go behind Wei Yan and cut him off. Then Wei Yan would be left to himself between the biggest city in the West (Chang An) and a determined force behind him. Zhuge Liang would be still leading the main force marching along the main roads, literally hundreds of miles away. Bad idea.

However, I believe Wei Yan's strategy could work. Zhuge Liang has been known to play safe all his life. He never puts himself in danger. This time, I think he played it too safe. Wei Yan's strategy could work precisely because the commander of the defending force was a spoiled prince who had never been on a battle field. This guy not only had no experience, but also was a very arrogant man. This would make him an ideal target for a surprise attack. If Wei Yan showed up in front of his city of Chang An overnight, he would be so shocked and completely lost his will to fight. He would not be able to think of strategy, other than running for his life. Indeed, this was what he did in a battle against Zhuge Liang's forces. If Zhuge Liang actually allowed Wei Yan to sneak attack Chang An, they could have destroyed Kingdom of Wei. Instead, Zhuge Liang's methodical way of attacking and obtaining every city along the way gave Wei time to regroup, not once, but twice. Finally, Wei hired Sima Yi, Zhuge Liang's nemesis. Sima Yi's arrival meant that Zhuge liang had to pulled back and ending the expedition.

3) Lost of Jie Ting
This followed the above event. When Sima Yi got to Chang An, he immediately found a weakness in Zhuge Liang's formation. There was a small crossroad called Jie Ting, which was the main choke point for Zhuge Liang's supply line. Sima Yi wanted to cut off Zhuge Liang's supply. He immediately sent out troops to attack Jie Ting. Even before Sima Yi got to Chang An, Zhuge Liang already predicted that Sima Yi would target Jie Ting. So He sent Ma Su, one of his generals, to guard the crossroad. Ma Su is a talented general, on paper. Although he had contributed to the discussion of many Zhuge Liang's strategies, he had never commanded troops and never actually fought any battles himself. When he got to Jie Ting, he immediately abandoned the direct order from Zhuge Liang and changed how the defense should be set. It turned out that his new defense formation was completely wrong. when Sima Yi first heard there were troops at Jie Ting, he was so nervous that he wanted to pulled back because he knew Zhuge Liang already knew his plans. Then when he actually saw the defense, he laughed so loud. He couldn't believe Zhuge Liang would send such an idiotic general to defend some place this important. In the end, Jie Ting was lost and Zhuge Liang had to pull all his troops back.

Although the direct blame was on Ma Su, I think Zhuge Liang should be blamed. how can you send a rookie on such an important mission, no matter how good he was on paper? It would be OK if it was a last resort, but Zhuge Liang at the time had hundreds, if not thousands of highly capable and highly experienced generals at his disposal. He should never send Ma Su.

What do you think? And other controversies?
 

solarz

Brigadier
Are we talking about the Romance of the 3 Kingdoms, or the actual history? There are quite a few fictional episodes in the Romance. However, just because an episode is fictional doesn't mean it didn't have military value. The founding emperor of Qing used a strategy from just such a fictional episode to turn the Ming emperor against his own best general.

That said, Zhuge Liang has been vastly exaggerated in the Romances. Historically, he was an administrator, not a military leader. His military capabilities have been described as mediocre by many people, including Mao Zedong.
 

vesicles

Colonel
Are we talking about the Romance of the 3 Kingdoms, or the actual history? There are quite a few fictional episodes in the Romance. However, just because an episode is fictional doesn't mean it didn't have military value. The founding emperor of Qing used a strategy from just such a fictional episode to turn the Ming emperor against his own best general.

Either should be fine. The goal is to discuss strategies. So fictional or not, if it works, it works.

That said, Zhuge Liang has been vastly exaggerated in the Romances. Historically, he was an administrator, not a military leader. His military capabilities have been described as mediocre by many people, including Mao Zedong.

the strategies do not have to come from Zhuge Liang. It could come from any main figure who lived in that era. I gave a few examples because they are the most famous ones. For example, Wei Yan vs. Zhuge Liang has been discussed by many historical figures throughout China as to which strategy is more sound. Some of the discussion came way before the novel, such as in the Tang and Song dynasties.

And the actual military contribution of Zhuge Liang could also be another controversy on its own.
 

solarz

Brigadier
On Wei Yan, I think the problem is not so much strategy as simply a decision not to take a risk. Some risks pay off, others end in disaster. History tends to remember and glorify risks that end up paying off big, but forgets about (or worse, vilifies) those risks that fail. You really can't argue something like that.

As for Ma Su, this is one of the reasons Zhuge Liang is not highly regarded by military strategists. Ma Su has no actual military experience, but because he's well read and can recite a lot of theories, Zhuge Liang thinks he's a talented general. In reality, Liu Bei himself has told Zhuge Liang that Ma Su cannot be relied upon.
 

vesicles

Colonel
I think it is a misunderstanding to believe that Zhuge Liang is only mediocre on military ops. Although the novel definitely makes him almost like a god as a military strategist, the real person in history was definitely not mediocre. 《三国志》, or the Chronicles of 3 Kingdoms, which was written immediately after the 3 kingdom era also praises his military capabilities. Note that 《三国志》 is a historical record, not a novel. The author of 《三国志》is 陈寿, whose father actually used to be a general serving under Zhuge Liang but was later executed by Zhuge Liang for directly disobeying Zhuge Liang's order in combat. So if anything, 陈寿 would put Zhuge Liang in a more negative light. Also, it was already in the Jin dynasty when 陈寿 was writing the chronicles, not too many good things could be said of the major figure who used to go up against the emperor.

Below is a few examples of what Zhuge Liang's contemporary said about his military capabilities, as recorded in the Chronicles of 3 Kingdoms. I only listed those who used to be his enemies since your enemy's praise is usually more valuable. Especially the second one, 司马懿 directly faced Zhuge Liang in combat and was his main nemesis.

《三国志》描述的一些人物对诸葛亮的评价:
张温:“然诸葛亮达见计数,必知神虑屈申之宜,加受朝廷天覆之惠,推亮之心,必无疑贰。

司马懿:“天下奇才也。”

The author of 《三国志》 also wrote 《诸葛亮集》:
三国蜀汉 诸葛亮(181~234)
其智谋为大家所公认,人称「卧龙」。

刘备屯兵新野时,徐庶为幕僚,向刘推荐诸葛亮。刘备三访其庐,诸葛亮才与其相见,并立刻提出了著名的《隆中对》。即占据荆、益二州,联合孙权,对抗曹操,统一天下的建议。深得刘备的赞赏,自此成了刘备主要辅佐。后助刘备败曹操于赤壁,佐定益州,使蜀与魏、吴成鼎足之势。曹丕代汉为帝后,刘备也称帝,诸葛亮出任丞相,总理国家大事,关羽镇守荆州。

章武三年(223)春,刘备在永安病危,召诸葛亮瞩托后事说:「君才十倍于曹丕,必能安国,终定大事。若嗣子可辅助,便给以辅助;若其不才,您可取而代之。」诸葛亮忙哭道:「臣必竭心尽力相辅,效忠贞之节,死而后已!」后主即位,诸葛亮受封武乡侯,建立丞相府以处理日常事务,又兼任益州牧。当时,全国的军、政、财,事无大小,皆由诸葛亮决定。

《读诸葛武侯传书怀赠长安崔少府叔封昆季》 唐·李白: 武侯立岷蜀,壮志吞咸京

《八阵图》 唐·杜甫: 功盖三分国,名成八阵图。

《咏怀古迹》 唐·杜甫: 诸葛大名垂宇宙,宗臣遗像肃清高。
三分割据纡筹策,万古云霄一羽毛

All these quote came thousands of years before the novel came out and were not influenced by the novel's depiction of Zhuge Liang.

Plus, Zhuge Liang's main overall strategy for the Kingdom of Shu is 《隆中对》 , which has been historically proven to be his writing. The strategies in 《隆中对》 is absolutely amazing and Liu Bei was able to establish Shu based on this strategy. So if nothing else, 《隆中对》 alone is enough to demonstrate Zhuge Liang as a brilliant strategist. Not as godly as described in the novel, but still humanly brilliant.
 
Top