Chinese Radar Developments - KLJ series and others

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
The side-looking array of KLJ-7A airborne AESA radar has near 600 T/R modules, in comparison, Su-57's side-looking N036B-1-01 X-band AESA radars has 358 T/R modules.

DrUFM2sVsAAiWtJ.jpg


DrUFXh6X4AAkFUf.jpg

DrUFhqZWwAAkHhb.jpg
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
That may be a simple metallic/plastic stand in plate, though, not an actual representation of the array, nor the number of its elements.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
I said it's unlikely because I've not seen any indication this is true yet you are 100% certain they are a world leader. To know this, you need to know exactly how advanced UK research is in detail and ALSO exactly how advanced everyone else is. Therefore there's nothing wrong with what I said while it is nearly impossible for you to make your statement with any certainty because you are certainly not intimately working within UK research teams AS WELL AS China's and US' and etc etc to determine a "world leader" ranking or sorts. Sonar they are probably exceptionally good at but that's nearly everyone. Passive detection is king and those details are a black hole for every nation. Good luck making any comments about that and proving it.

As far as I'm aware (obviously this is based off limited knowledge because these things are never disclosed) UK does not have any projects. This doesn't mean they don't but there's never been a single news of breakthrough or potential and who is responsible for it, coming out of the UK whereas China's continuously demonstrated ability with quantum telecom and there's been heaps of rumours about new detection technologies. Then add the drastic differences in defense spending and related research spending between the two nations and it's likely that China is ahead in these regards. It also means that since China may not be world leader in these fields, if they are likely in front of the UK then that's to say UK is not at the forefront. BTW never did I say China's a world leader in these fields. Just that UK hasn't shown itself to be one. While this doesn't mean the reverse is true. I would bet as much as I can on this being the case. And following that pattern of reasoning, because Ethiopia hasn't claimed or shown any promise, it doesn't mean they don't have any and therefore they could really be a world leader? Well okay then. We'll see about it.

If the UK is world leader in virtually zero defense related technologies, you can bet your house they are not world leader in detection because these high end projects are far better suited to be conducted by the US. They have the talent, funding, and infrastructure advantage against the UK as a start. It makes little sense for the UK to be pouring resources into a relatively less important part of the their defense. Their main threat is Russia and there are far more pressing military hardware that could use the most funding and allocation of resources that will have priority over detection technologies. Sure they can come out with breakthroughs and sell them to all NATO but when's the last time UK has been ahead of the US in any major field? 70s? I dunno. Defense spending has gone down relative since then. I think Sampson is their most impressive piece of detection technology (software + hardware) and even that is not impressive against SPY-1 let alone SPY-6 and perhaps even Type 346B.

But please do enlighten me and provide me with some of that research. My small efforts have yielded zero impressive results from UK. They are well behind France and US in terms of technology and research. The only thing impressive is their actual armed forces and their equipment. Nothing breakthrough will come from the UK anymore because all of that is done by the US and why shouldn't it be. Back when they did amazing innovation in military gear was before completely cosying up with the US.


This sounds to me more like selling radars that will end up on China's export arms, like ships and planes to yet another customer country. This means China is not the end user of the radars but rather the integrator to these radars of the ships and planes that is sold to another customer. A good example is the Thales SMART-S Mark II that was exported to China and installed on the C28 corvettes that were sold to the Algerian Navy. Which reminds me, what British radar is similar to that? The Type 997 Artisan 3D radar used on the Type 23 frigate upgrades and planned to be used on the Type 26 frigates. The Chinese does have their own equivalent, the SR2410C, but an export customer may still want to specifically demand a non-Chinese radar, so let's say, in a hypothetical case, the customer will be choosing either the Thales or the British product.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
China Reveals Prototype Configuration Of Jam Resistant And Counter-Stealth 'Quantum Radar'
The Chinese will still need to overcome major hurdles in order to get the system out of the laboratory and onto the battlefield.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
NOVEMBER 6, 2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China claims to have revealed a prototype of an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and may be able to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The system’s operation is rooted in proven science and could be game-changing, but the Chinese still face significant development challenges in turning it into an operational capability.

The state-owned China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC) brought a mockup
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which might have also been only a smaller scale model, to the biennial Zhuhai Airshow, which opened its doors on Nov. 6, 2018, and has a wide array of military technology on display. CETC says that its 14th Research Institute has been working on the system for years and first tested it in 2015.


The new type of radar “is expected to solve the traditional bottleneck [of] detection of low observable target detection, survival under electronic warfare conditions, platform load limitations, etc.,” according to a CETC brochure, which a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
obtained at Zhuhai. That same journalist attempted to attend a press conference about the system, but was asked to leave after officials informed them it was for Chinese media only.


The basic principle behind
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
isn’t overly complex in of itself. A traditional radar emits a beam of electromagnetic energy, which then reflects off objects in the distance, allowing the entire system to register their return signiture and position with varying degrees of specificity.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That’s what a quantum radar looks like, by the way. Can anyone translate the brochure?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


A quantum radar does essentially the same thing, but using photons that are “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” together after a single beam of light is split in half. One of the two new beams passes through a converter that sends the particles traveling onward at a microwave frequency to bounce off objects like a normal radar. The full system would convert the particles back into the visible frequency as they returned to the radar’s receiver.

The second beam doesn’t do much actively, but serves an immensely important purpose. A phenomenon called quantum entanglement means that the pairs of photons that appear at the point a beam of light is split otherwise have a tendency to operate identically regardless of how far they are apart.

What this means is that the quantum radar should be able to register the paired photons in both streams and record only the signals it gets back from particles that have a partner. This would make the system more accurate since it would be able to quickly eliminate signals from other sources, such as ground clutter when tracking targets at low altitude or operating in a maritime role.

In the video below, a researcher at the Dutch research institute
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
explains the basic principles behind a quantum radar.


In principle, this would also give a quantum radar the ability to immediately disregard outside radio frequency “noise,” make it far less vulnerable to traditional jamming, which often involves flooding the receiver with so many signals, or sending out false or misleading signals, that it is impossible to distinguish targets of interest. In the inverse, the photons may not necessarily trigger existing radar warning receivers on hostile aircraft, leaving their crew unaware that someone has detected and is tracking them.

On top of these benefits, the quantum radar should be able to identify
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Existing radar absorbent materials are not specifically designed to absorb or defuse these particles. Stealthy shapes might still deflect the photons and cause them to lose energy to some degree, but the system’s ability to isolate only the activities of the entangled photons theoretically means that it should be able to detect even a very weak signal by cutting out all of the background noise.

These same basic principles of quantum entanglement, if scientists can truly harness them, may have other military applications, as well. China is also reportedly developing satellites carrying “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” cameras, which might be able to take pictures of stealth aircraft from space, even at night. You can read more about that proposed system
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
A quantum radar does essentially the same thing, but using photons that are “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” together after a single beam of light is split in half. One of the two new beams passes through a converter that sends the particles traveling onward at a microwave frequency

This part does not make any sense in which is a physics impossibility.
Photons can only travel in frequency of light within the electro-magnetic spectrum that is what light is.
 

Hyperwarp

Captain
This part does not make any sense in which is a physics impossibility.
Photons can only travel in frequency of light within the electro-magnetic spectrum that is what light is.

The wording of the article maybe off, but you can slow down the speed of light dramatically. It is fastest in a vacuum, and down from there onwards.
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
The wording of the article maybe off, but you can slow down the speed of light dramatically. It is fastest in a vacuum, and down from there onwards.
It can only be done is a controlled environment and not in vacuum. By the way, light and microwave travels at the same velocity since they are both electromagnetic phenomenon just on different spectrum due to different carrier medium.
 
Last edited:

Hyperwarp

Captain
It can only be done is a controlled environment and not in vacuum. By the way, light and microwave travels at the same velocity since they are both electromagnetic phenomenon just on different spectrum due to different carrier medium.

Precisely (That's why I said "fastest in a vacuum, and down from there onwards"). It is the medium in which it travels. That's why we see Cherenkov radiation.

From what I could decipher, they have two entangled photons and they send one through a certain medium that slows it down. How this actually works and helps them detect stealth aircraft, I am not at all clear.
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Precisely (That's why I said "fastest in a vacuum, and down from there onwards"). It is the medium in which it travels. That's why we see Cherenkov radiation.

From what I could decipher, they have two entangled photons and they send one through a certain medium that slows it down. How this actually works and helps them detect stealth aircraft, I am not at all clear.
It states in the article;

One of the two new beams passes through a converter that sends the particles traveling onward at a microwave frequency to bounce off objects like a normal radar.

So it's traveling through open air towards the object namely a stealth plane but photons cannot travel at microwave frequencies they travel in light frequencies, electrons travel in microwave frequencies thus the different carrier mediums.
Entangled photons can travel in light frequencies but it will only be in twins so you will not know what the photon had hit. Unless you have a massive amounts of cryogenic containers to contain each photons shoot all entangled photons in a matrix that can show size and shape to the observer and arrange the containers in the matrix you had shot then this so called quantum radar will not work.
As always bad journalism.
 

shifty_ginosaji

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Microwaves are a subset of light waves in common parlance.

Both electrons and photons can travel at 'microwave frequencies' though, although referring to the energy of an electron by it's de Broglie wavelength makes no sense.
 
Top