This is true, quite a bit of manufacturing are moving interior or westward. The wages there are cheaper and the trained migrant workers are usually the pioneers that brings work back home. They would first start getting contract on producing part of the products and over the year, they would be building the entire product. The original boss from the coastal cities could shut down the manufacturing operation and contract the migrant worker to produce the product from their home town. As second and third tier city grows, manufacturing also get shifted there since stable infrastructure would be build.
Chinese Economics Thread
- Thread starter Norfolk
- Start date
This is true, quite a bit of manufacturing are moving interior or westward. The wages there are cheaper and the trained migrant workers are usually the pioneers that brings work back home. They would first start getting contract on producing part of the products and over the year, they would be building the entire product. The original boss from the coastal cities could shut down the manufacturing operation and contract the migrant worker to produce the product from their home town. As second and third tier city grows, manufacturing also get shifted there since stable infrastructure would be build.
Deleted a bunch of posts that's completely off topic.
Equation, I don't know what your problem is, but in at least 2 occasions here you called any posts that you see as anti-Chinese government to be Christians, even though there is no indication that Christianity has anything to do with it.
We allow both pro and anti-Chinese posts here on this forum.
Anything more like this will get you a suspension.
And btw, as an aside on this since there seems to be much hate on Christianity and West here. Chinese people living in Western Christian countries have been allowed to pursue their dreams, live peacefully and legally obtain citizenship. There has no been any case in US, Canada and Australia of mass targeted violent racial attacks against Chinese population as there have been in Indonesia in 1998 or Malaysia in 1967 (or even last year).
Equation, I don't know what your problem is, but in at least 2 occasions here you called any posts that you see as anti-Chinese government to be Christians, even though there is no indication that Christianity has anything to do with it.
We allow both pro and anti-Chinese posts here on this forum.
Anything more like this will get you a suspension.
And btw, as an aside on this since there seems to be much hate on Christianity and West here. Chinese people living in Western Christian countries have been allowed to pursue their dreams, live peacefully and legally obtain citizenship. There has no been any case in US, Canada and Australia of mass targeted violent racial attacks against Chinese population as there have been in Indonesia in 1998 or Malaysia in 1967 (or even last year).
Last edited:
I don't think my message was clear, this is an economics thread, we allow economic stuff here.
If you have problem with what I said, please message me rather than continue to go off topic. I'd gladly have a long discussion with anyone who thinks I am being unfair as long as you stay on topic.
If you have problem with what I said, please message me rather than continue to go off topic. I'd gladly have a long discussion with anyone who thinks I am being unfair as long as you stay on topic.
broadsword
Brigadier
That is cool, though I believe Equation was responding to someone who was also OT and in an inflammatory way.
I think to be objective, we should focus our comments or debate on Economic, Trade and Investment issues in this Thread. These are currently interesting, especially with President Trump's recent US trade policies that appear in-ward looking, as well as President Xi Jiping's views/ support for trade globalisation at Davos recently. Economists and businesses are interested in where the world and region will be heading, and actions that can being taken i.e. progress of AIIB, One Belt One Road, Maritime Silk Road, RCEP, bi-lateral & other multi-lateral trade agreements with UK, EU etc.
Jura The idiot
General
On hind side, I believe President Xi and his Economic, Diplomatic & Security Team are wise, patient and practical when dealing with the Trump Administration. When there is disarray and confusion presently taking place in the US by internal arguments and counter-arguments, best to remain a discerning observer, except on major issues like the "One China Policy" and a few other China's core interest. The American political "smog" is still around, but hopefully slowly clearing in due course. Trump's recent reaffirming of the "One China's Policy" when contacting President Xi, and Defence Secretary Mattis's reference to the South China Sea contrary to what was commented earlier by Tillerston (now Secretary of State) are encouraging. The geopolitical, economic and security manoeuvrings are like playing "Chess", where the player who is patient and observant of his opponent's hasty moves have the advantage of planning his counter strategies. Wise saying of Sun Tzu (500 BC) "Know Yourself & Know Your Enemy (albeit Competitor), 100 Battles 100 Victories". However, the best scenario for the world for the next 10-20 years is to have common understanding between Super Power US & Rising Power China, with the Give & Take moves leading, hopefully to a "Win-Win" situation for both nations.
Jura The idiot
General
Well it's not untrue, but it's basically a gimmick at this point... so I'm not sure what you really mean.