Chinese cruise and anti-ship missiles

Discussion in 'Strategic Defense' started by crobato, Feb 24, 2009.

  1. escobar
    Offline

    escobar Brigadier

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,709
    Likes Received:
    2,949
    it says: The practical application has shown that the accuracy of the automatic identification for the 19 large vessels has reached 98%.

    it also says: PLA has finished setting up all the facilities and infrastructure allowing to integrate data from all Chinese communication, remote sensing and navigation sats and to do real-time processing in an intelligent way, retranscribe them and distribute them directly to the tactical devices in less than xx min
     
  2. AssassinsMace
    Offline

    AssassinsMace Brigadier

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    7,652
    Likes Received:
    8,630
    I don't know if this was public before but a lot of pages from 2006 on the ASBM posted in this link. One of them says they were simulating a warhead with sub munitions to destroy aircraft on deck.

    http://lt.cjdb*.net/thread-1576520-1-1.html

    Remember to replace the asterisk with a "y" in the address.
     
  3. Engineer
    Offline

    Engineer Major

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,202
    Likes Received:
    1,397
    Those have been posted on this message board before, but I cannot find the thread now. What happened back then was that the naysayers kept on nay-saying, while unable to pull up one credible source to refute the solutions described in those papers.
     
  4. s002wjh
    Offline

    s002wjh Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    132
    there is a big difference between a paper vs something actually implemented. in theory paper on fusion, railgun, emag weapon are all published long time ago, but in reality none is implemented. people publish paper all the time, but doesn't mean its implementable yet.
     
  5. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,165
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    Yes but these papers are reporting the results of a real life test, so your argument doesn't quite hold water.

    One may argue the tests they conducted were not realistic (though that depends on the details we have) or that the papers are BSing (which would be a rather extreme reaction).
     
  6. s002wjh
    Offline

    s002wjh Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    132
    could you link on the paper that report actual result? i only saw theoretical stuff
     
  7. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,165
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/str...se-anti-ship-missiles-16-4368.html#post245894

    http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/str...se-anti-ship-missiles-17-4368.html#post246124
     
  8. Engineer
    Offline

    Engineer Major

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,202
    Likes Received:
    1,397
    It wasn't an issue of implementation. Those papers explained in details on how methods of detecting, tracking, and targeting carriers are possible despite naysayers claiming otherwise. As to implementation, we now know they have tested out their detection and tracking methods as early as 2007.
     
  9. s002wjh
    Offline

    s002wjh Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    132
    like i said method of det/track etc these are all theory, its like i say, we can detect ship with SAR, sure, but how do you implment the algorithm on what chip, system integration etc. anyway ill read some those link see if its true
     
  10. Engineer
    Offline

    Engineer Major

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,202
    Likes Received:
    1,397
    Like I said, it wasn't an issue of implementation. Discussions back then didn't even get to implementation, because naysayers cannot accept that there can be methods to detect, track and target carriers. The papers show these methods are possible despite naysayers claiming otherwise.

    As to implementation, we now know they have tested out their detection and tracking methods as early as 2007. The documents also said that a full scaled test was performed.
     
Loading...

Share This Page