China's strategy in Korean peninsula

Discussion in 'Strategic Defense' started by Phead128, Dec 11, 2013.

  1. Phead128
    Offline

    Phead128 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    116
    I'm writing this in response to this video by CNN: CNN - How Korean war might play out
    and this video: CNN - US. vs. N. Korea in the Second Korean War

    China views North Korea's independent nuclear deterrent in two major signifcant ways.

    1. Independent nuclear deterrent safeguards North Korea sovereignty from threats and and regime change by foreign nations.
      • (Benefits for China: Deployed nukes reduces probability of U.S. invasion, redirect PLA resources elsewhere, such as Taiwan or Naval buildup)
    2. Extensive penetration of Chinese espionage and cyber warfare units in North Korean nuclear infrastructure (Chinese version of Stuxnet virus) means only China has access to North Korea's nuclear materials in the event of regime collapse.
      • (Benefits for China: Under an UN mandate, China gets international support to intervene in North Korea to restore order, recover "rogue nuclear materials", and distribute humanitarian aid, before U.S. can unilaterally challenge China by exploiting NK situation)


    It seems pretty clear to me that the North Korea PAL system (nuclear launch code authorization) is extensively penetrated by Chinese version of Stuxnet virus given the economic dependence and close military relationship between China and North Korea.
    • (Benefits for China: Rogue leader cannot nuke Seoul on an whim because nuclear launch codes are infiltrated by Chinese hackers, so they are defacto in control of Beijing)



    In the event of rebellion, military coup, or regime instability, China can acquire an United Nations mandate to intervene to restore stability, recover "rogue nuclear weapons", distribute aid, etc...

    U.S. can try to challenge China by sending in special forces to occupy nuclear sites before China can, but that would require crossing the DMZ, potentially escalation the situation into full-scale war. U.S. should trust that China can secure the nuclear sites of North Korea, and should not challenge China's attempt to restore order/peace/nuclear weapons in North Korea.

    U.S. may try to exploit this situation by sending in special forces to pre-empt Chinese troops in Pyongyang capital region. However, PLA divisions can be deployed to Pyongyang capital region within two (2) years of notification of instability in North Korea, and set up a line between Nampo and Wonsan along the Taedong river (greatest extent of Tang era Protectorate General to Pacifiy the East) as a red line that US/ROK troops should not pass above the Taedong river. Also, China can send a division of troops to secure the DPRK border to deter movements of refugees, and another division towards Shiniju (opening of Tumen river) to prevent US/Japan naval blocade of the vital river opening which northeastern China depends on for access to the Sea of Japan.
     
    #1 Phead128, Dec 11, 2013
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2013
  2. PanAsian
    Offline

    PanAsian Major

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Messages:
    3,174
    Likes Received:
    3,678
    How would China respond if regime change came to North Korea?

    http://www.janes.com/article/58657/annual-us-south-korean-drills-include-targeting-of-north-korean-leadership

     
  3. AndrewS
    Offline

    AndrewS Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2015
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    1,626
    Here goes:

    1. China guarantees the security of North Korea

    It supports the successor to Fatty Kim, or installs his brother as the new leader. That brother is currently being kept for such a contingency by China and Singapore.

    In either case, the new NK leader will be beholden to China for his survival, and should be more amenable to calls for economic reform on the Chinese model and denuclearisation.


    2. Allow North Korean to collapse.

    The Chinese military moves into Yongbyon and other border areas to secure the nuclear materials and also create a Chinese occupied buffer zone. China might not even need a UN mandate, as it might be "invited" by whoever is left in control of NK.

    Those troops serve as a stabilising force because China keeps the really anti-US North Koreans from causing further trouble, by offering the prospect of a comfortable retirement or sanctuary.

    The Chinese troops stay pending the termination of the South Korean - US military alliance and the removal of all US troops from Korea. Then a neutral and reunified Korea gets on with rebuilding the desperately poor North. However this job is beyond the financial and industrial capacity of South Korea alone (see the strain of East Germany integration), but China is right next door and has good reasons to build infrastructure in North Korea, as it will connect China with the prosperous south of Korea.

    Eventually we end up with a single Korea-China trade zone, and given how much trade South Korea does with China already, a reunified Korea should find China a more important trading partner than the rest of the world combined.

    Note that this scenario applies generally to any NK collapse scenario, and I think is probably the best win-win scenario for everyone involved.


    My view is that it could go either way, depending on the leadup of events, the eventual goals of SK/US and the negotiations on what happens to the US if Korea is reunified.
     
    PanAsian likes this.
  4. taxiya
    Offline

    taxiya Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,604
    Likes Received:
    5,751
    My understanding is that there is no need for China to obtain an UN mandate to enter NK. Remember the Sino-NK friendship and mutual assistance treaty which stipulate that both side will provide any means to each other in case one of them is under threat of a third country or alliance. The invitation from NK is preferably from the top leader (that is Kim) but not necessarily if he is incapable (that may happen for whatever reasons). After all the treaty is between two states, not two people, and I believe finding a person or faction within NK to extend that invitation to China is easy for anybody's own sake after Kim is gone.
     
  5. taxiya
    Offline

    taxiya Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,604
    Likes Received:
    5,751
    Generally agreed with logics. But two comments though.

    1.
    I am sure "not need" is a certain thing because the existing treaty. Whoever is left in control is one of the existing members of the current government who can only survive with China's backing, forget about surrendering to SK or U.S. They will be throw in prison the minute they handover their weapon.

    2. Because the left-in-controls are from the current government who must and surely will have Chinese backing, the "regime" will not collapse. Only Kim himself and his close allies in the leadership will be gone, cleansed, purged. The institution will stay because the majority of the ruling people will stay. It would be more akin to PRC's purge of the gang of four in 1976.
     
    PanAsian likes this.
  6. Blackstone
    Offline

    Blackstone Brigadier

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    5,288
    Likes Received:
    4,671
    I'm not sure what's a greater threat to the US-alliance in the Asia-Pacific, no-THAAD missile defense system in South Korea to ease regional concerns with DPRK nuclear saber rattling, or yes-THHAD system and make Beijing insure about its nuclear deterrence, leading to possible countermeasures like better ballistic missiles or even building more nuclear weapons.

    U.S. hopes China will agree to talk about South Korea missile defense

     
    PanAsian likes this.
  7. antiterror13
    Offline

    antiterror13 Major

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    3,558
    Likes Received:
    3,806
    why the US want China to agree of deployment of new missile defense system in South Korea?
     
    N00813, Equation and AssassinsMace like this.
  8. kroko
    Offline

    kroko Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    229
  9. PanAsian
    Offline

    PanAsian Major

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Messages:
    3,174
    Likes Received:
    3,678
    To ratchet up tensions even more by offering China a false choice then demonizing China with it and deploying THAAD to neutralize China's military capabilities and much reduce its diplomatic leverage anyways.

    In proclaimed intent THAAD in South Korea is supposed to target North Korea but in practical capability THAAD in South Korea also works against China, and to a lesser extent Russia, no matter what anyone says. THAAD capabilities will not only be available to South Korea and the US, but also Japan.

    China's conventional forces in NE Asia are no match for the conventional forces the US can bring to bear in the area, especially adding in at least South Korea in any scenario involving North Korea if not adding in Japan as well in any scenario. China's conventional and nuclear ballistic missiles go a long ways to counter this imbalance but THAAD neutralizes this counter.

    Strategically this allows the US, Japan, and South Korea, in this order of significance, to be involved in military conflict with China anywhere including outside NE Asia, such as in any Taiwan, SCS, or even attack on China's mainland scenario, with much reduced to almost minimal threat to their own military bases and/or home territory.

    China will never agree to THAAD for these practical reasons just as THAAD is a trump card for Japan, South Korea, and the US, in this order of significance for practical reasons. With the offer to talk the US can cast China as complicit (if it agrees to talk) yet unreasonable and insincere in terms of reining in North Korea, uncaring towards South Korea, and threatening towards everyone (when China maintains it is against THAAD in South Korea) despite actual Chinese vulnerability if THAAD is deployed.

    This also threatens to go in the unlikely but not actually that extreme direction of both South Korea and Japan obtaining their own nuclear weapons which will significantly weaken China much more than the US, despite still weakening the US relatively.
     
  10. Equation
    Offline

    Equation Lieutenant General

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    10,339
    Likes Received:
    11,691
    So...China could always counter that with an HQ-9 in the DPRK and so forth.
     
Loading...

Share This Page