China's Space Program News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

davidau

Senior Member
Registered Member
here it is...pictorial...but 'real'..CZ-8

20191204-7ab6aa04-165a-11ea-a2a8-52540010fa16.gif
 

by78

General
Xuntian large-diameter space telescope, planned for 2024. Intended to study star-formation, early universe, etc. It will inhabit the same orbit as the future Chinese space station. For maintenance and repairs, it will dock with the space station.

49176263963_f453f5e6c3_b.jpg

49176265078_e04c0d42e6_b.jpg

My technical Chinese in optics and astronomy is less than rudimentary. Please help translate. All I can make out is a summary of the lens elements (2-meter diameter something, infrared something...) and intended mission areas.
49176265148_96b314ec18_b.jpg
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Xuntian large-diameter space telescope, planned for 2024. Intended to study star-formation, early universe, etc. It will inhabit the same orbit as the future Chinese space station. For maintenance and repairs, it will dock with the space station.

49176263963_f453f5e6c3_b.jpg

49176265078_e04c0d42e6_b.jpg

My technical Chinese in optics and astronomy is less than rudimentary. Please help translate. All I can make out is a summary of the lens elements (2-meter diameter something, infrared something...) and intended mission areas.
49176265148_96b314ec18_b.jpg

Great news. How good it is compare to Hubble or James Webb ?
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Xuntian large-diameter space telescope, planned for 2024. Intended to study star-formation, early universe, etc. It will inhabit the same orbit as the future Chinese space station. For maintenance and repairs, it will dock with the space station.

49176263963_f453f5e6c3_b.jpg

49176265078_e04c0d42e6_b.jpg

My technical Chinese in optics and astronomy is less than rudimentary. Please help translate. All I can make out is a summary of the lens elements (2-meter diameter something, infrared something...) and intended mission areas.
49176265148_96b314ec18_b.jpg
2m diameter lense, Off-axis (离轴), TMA (three mirror astigmatism) reflection (三反). 0.15" angular resolution. Ultra-violet to near infrared spectrum coverage, wide field of view.

Most of today's large aperture telescope use two reflective mirrors. There is a hole in the center of the main mirror that passes light from the small mirror at the front onto the sensor. The hole is bad. The solution is to move the light path between the mirrors off the main mirror to the side. Therefor the off-axis. The demands the mirrors to be not in the shape of paraboloic, and the induced distortion to be compensated, therefor astigmatism.

In this specific design, there are three mirrors instead of two, so the three mirror.

I am particularly glad to see that the telescope is put in the same orbit as the station and can be re-docked with the station for maintenance. The Hubble suffered the faulty mirror problem but could not be truly repaired by replacing the mirror. Another advantage is that, the station-keeping motors can be refueled together with the station.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
James Webb is totally different thing, not because it is bigger, but because its different spectrum.

It is more closer to Hubble in terms of the kind of work. The Chinese assessment is that it is around the same as Hubble, some aspects being better, some being less.

But it says to have a field of view 300 times larger than the Hubble Space Telescope.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

by78

General
2m diameter lense, Off-axis (离轴), TMA (three mirror astigmatism) reflection (三反). 0.15" angular resolution. Ultra-violet to near infrared spectrum coverage, wide field of view.

Most of today's large aperture telescope use two reflective mirrors. There is a hole in the center of the main mirror that passes light from the small mirror at the front onto the sensor. The hole is bad. The solution is to move the light path between the mirrors off the main mirror to the side. Therefor the off-axis. The demands the mirrors to be not in the shape of paraboloic, and the induced distortion to be compensated, therefor astigmatism.

In this specific design, there are three mirrors instead of two, so the three mirror.

I am particularly glad to see that the telescope is put in the same orbit as the station and can be re-docked with the station for maintenance. The Hubble suffered the faulty mirror problem but could not be truly repaired by replacing the mirror. Another advantage is that, the station-keeping motors can be refueled together with the station.

Much appreciated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top