China's Space Program News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

SinoSoldier

Colonel
The nose cone diameter is variable to a certain degree depending on the type of payload. It just so happens the CZ-7 was shown with a larger diameter nose cone compared to its body.

Take a look at the strap-on boosters. The ones in the CZ-7 had nose cones with their apexes pointing directly up while the ones in this rocket had apexes leaning towards the core of the rocket, as do the boosters of the CZ-5 identified during testing phase.
 

Quickie

Colonel
Take a look at the strap-on boosters. The ones in the CZ-7 had nose cones with their apexes pointing directly up while the ones in this rocket had apexes leaning towards the core of the rocket, as do the boosters of the CZ-5 identified during testing phase.

That's correct with regard to the CZ-5 boosters, but t2contra was referring to the nose cone/fairing of the CZ-7 main core.
 

B.I.B.

Captain
Apologies, if this bit of news has been posted earlier. If it was to eventuate it could lead to more complex co-operation which I think is a win win for everybody.

"WASHINGTON— China has taken a small, but potentially meaningful, step toward more normalized relations with the international space community, a top US general announced this month.
Gen. John Hyten, the head of US Air Force Space Command, told an audience at a Dec. 5 Air Force Association event that Chinese officials, for the first time, have asked that the US share space situational awareness information directly through a military-to-military connection.
Space Command typically shares that information with industry and other nations through conjunction summary messages (CSM), essentially small reports that tell satellite operators the Air Force predicts their system will be traveling dangerously close to another in-orbit object. The goal is to give those operators enough time to move their systems out of the way, either from another satellite or from space debris.
The Air Force can share this information directly with the vast majority of the world’s governments and industry operators, with two notable exceptions: Russia and China. In both cases, those CSMs have to be transferred from Space Command to the US State Department, then sent over to state’s equivalent and then down to the Chinese or Russian operators.
“It takes a long time to get through that process, sometimes too long,” Hyten noted. “It’s a big deal because they asked for that kind of information direct, and I think that’s a good thing.”
Hyten stressed that from an operational standpoint, the only thing changing is the final address of where the CSMs go, and how long that takes. The data shared with China remains the same.
But he expressed optimism this could be a step forward for China in joining international norms for space, noting, “we want space to be a safe place to operate, and that means every nation needs to be involved in that.”
“That’s tremendous,” Hyten said of China’s request. “That’s awesome. Because that is the kind of international partnership we need to think about.”
A State Department official directed a request for comment back to the Pentagon. The longer CSM process remains with Russia.
Brian Weeden, technical adviser to the Secure World Foundation, compared the situation with China to that with Russian space launch, where US intelligence experts understand how Russian systems are put into orbit and operate.
“Like the US, Russia has settled into some pretty defined patterns and operational techniques,” he said. “We didn’t have that same familiarity with China, and anytime there’s unfamiliarity, there is a risk of both misperceptions and mistakes.”
Weeden said lines of communication were also open between the Russians and US during the Cold War, which may not be there on space issues between the US and China. Opening those lines is the biggest result of this new policy shift, he said.
“China is on a path to develop full spectrum space capabilities, and there are those in the US that see that as not only competition, but potentially adversarial,” he added. “Lines of communication and some degree of familiarity can help incidents from escalating out of control.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Quickie

Colonel
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China Yutu Rover Just Changed Everything We Thought We Knew About Our Moon

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

23:45 13.03.2015(updated 05:10 14.03.2015)
4493200
The “Jade Rabbit” discovered at least 9 subterranean layers beneath the lunar surface, 5 more than was previously thought.

Scientists believe the layers are a result of ancient lava flow between strata of regolith, the moon’s soil.

Professor Long Xiao, a researcher at the China University of Geosciences in Wuhan, told Space.com there are two interesting things about the layers found by Yutu, whose name means “Jade Rabbit.”

1019474760.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China's Yutu moon rover, photographed by the Chang'e 3 lander on Dec. 16, 2013.


"One is [that] more volcanic events have been defined in the late volcanism history of the moon. Another is the lunar mare [volcanic plain] area is not only composed of basaltic lavas, but also explosive eruption-formed pyroclastic rocks"
"The latter finding may shed light on … the volatile contents in the lunar mantle," he said.

China’s Chang’e-3 spacecraft landed on the moon in December 2013 and dispatched Yutu to study the landing site, Reuters reported. It ended up near a relatively fresh crater in a region known as Mare Imbrium, a site much younger than those explored by NASA’s 1969-1972 Apollo landing sites and those explored by Soviet lunar missions.

1019474778.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



By looking at images of the subsurface of the moon, and new data obtained by Yutu, researchers say it’s likely that more eruptions have filled the basin creating greater depths and more layers than Yutu can “see.”

“The layering structures tell us the late-stage volcanism show different styles,” Xiao said. “It (also) means volatile elements played an important role in the thermal history of our moon.”

 

delft

Brigadier
The Air Force can share this information directly with the vast majority of the world’s governments and industry operators, with two notable exceptions: Russia and China. In both cases, those CSMs have to be transferred from Space Command to the US State Department, then sent over to state’s equivalent and then down to the Chinese or Russian operators.
OT
There has been cooperation with Russia and before with the Soviet Union on space matters since the mid '70's. Why doesn't that extent to the CSMs?
 

Franklin

Captain
Long March 7 is delayed again untill 2016 and Long March 5 won't launch this year as expected but also in 2016. Long march 6 may launch this year.

Long March 7 Is Delayed Again, Due To Fly In 2016

It is not unusual for complex development programs to slip. But delays do not usually mount as steeply as they have for Long March 7. In March 2012 the rocket, China’s future workhorse space launcher, was supposed to be about 20 months away from flight. Three years later, that first launch is still at least 10 months away.

Work on Long March 5, meanwhile, has progressed as far as assembling the first airframe; engines have apparently not been installed. That launcher, the largest of the three in China’s new family of carrier rockets, will also be ready for flight in 2016, while the smallest, Long March 6, should lead its siblings with a first liftoff in the middle of this year.

In one configuration, Long March 7 is designed to throw 13.5 metric tons (29,800 lb.) to low-inclination low Earth orbits; it will replace the larger versions of the current Long March 2, 3 and 4 series. It may also become China’s manned launcher, replacing Long March 2F.

The largest version of Long March 5, the one that has been assembled, is supposed to throw 14 tons to geostationary transfer orbit, while Long March 6 has variously been credited with a throw-weight to Sun-synchronous polar orbit of 500 kg (1,100 lb.) or more than 1 ton.

The latest schedule for the three rockets, which are under development together because they share airframe modules and engines, was given by Tan Yonghua, president of the Academy of Aerospace Propulsion Technology (AAPT). Tan is probably happy to discuss the matter because the Long March 7 delay is unlikely to be the fault of his organization. AAPT is providing the engines, which have long been confirmed as mature and ready for service.

“The Long March 7 and our most powerful rocket, the Long March 5, will make their first flights next year, and they will also use the new engine,” the China Daily quotes Tan as saying. The engine is the 120-ton-thrust YF-100. Its development was completed before 2012, when series production of the engine began. So it has been waiting at least three years for its first flight on one—any—of the new launchers. Long March 6 will provide the occasion.

The launcher family is made up of three airframe modules, in varying lengths. Two of the modules—3.35 meters (11 ft.) and 2 meters in diameter—are powered by one or two YF-100s, burning kerosene with liquid oxygen. Those two modules serve as core first stages for Long March 6 and 7 and boosters for Long March 7 and 5. The 5-meter-dia. Long March 5 core modules burn liquid hydrogen with liquid oxygen.

Tan’s schedule for Long March 5 and 6 confirms an Aviation Week report from December, but at that time it appeared that Long March 7 would make its first flight in 2015. Late last year, the airframe of the first Long March 7 had been built, but the engines had not been installed. Before that, the developer and manufacturer, the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT), overcame difficulties that had arisen in the propellant supply system (but not in the engines) by making more than 10 changes to the Long March 7 design. It appears, then, that some new problem may have emerged to push the first flight into 2016.

The schedule has slipped by a total of more than two years during the three years of program execution.

The first airframe underwent tests at a launch site that was not in the Chinese interior, says China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp. (CASC), the country’s main space industry organization. Since the airframe traveled by sea, that site was presumably the new launch base on Hainan. The tests were successful, says CASC, apparently referring to a set of evaluations that late last year were expected to verify compatibility of onboard and off-board systems.

The airframe was built at Beijing, the home of CALT, and at a new space manufacturing base at Tianjin.

CALT is also developing Long March 5. Sibling organization Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST) is handling Long March 6, which has been expected to be the easiest of the three to develop, because it is the smallest and simplest.

An official photograph of the first Long March 5 (see photo) shows the 5B version, the most powerful, featuring two core stages and four boosters of the largest diameter.

The core modules of the first Long March 5 were being built late last year, by which time the boosters were ready. The next step was to be assembly of the complete airframe without engines. That appears to be the stage that has now been reached. The photograph of the airframe, shown on China Central Television, reveals no sign of the engines.

“Whole-rocket” tests have been conducted successfully on the assembled launcher, says CASC.

In February, the Xinhua news agency reported that the program had completed a ground test on the power system of the Long March 5.

CALT, SAST and AAPT are parts of CASC, which is the main manufacturer for the country’s space program.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top