China's SCS Strategy Thread

noted
Navy to press patrols in disputed sea, China calls out ‘meddlers’
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The U.S. Navy will continue patrolling the disputed South China Sea, a top Navy official said Monday, after
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
came dangerously close to an American Navy ship during a “freedom of navigation” sail-by near a Chinese-occupied reef.

Adm. John Richardson, who heads U.S. naval operations, said in a news conference with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Manila on Monday that such patrols highlight the U.S. position against “illegitimate maritime claims.”

“We will continue to progress this program of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,” Richardson said. “We do dozens of these operations around the world to indicate our position for ... illegitimate claims, maritime claims.”

While Washington has no claims to the strategic waterway, it has declared that freedom of navigation and the peaceful resolution of the disputes are in the U.S. national interest. The U.S. has also questioned China’s expansive claims, bringing it into a collision course with Beijing as the countries' ties deteriorate.

A Chinese destroyer came close to the USS Decatur in late September in an “unsafe and unprofessional maneuver” near Gaven Reef in the South China Sea, forcing it to maneuver to prevent a collision, according to the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

U.S. Pacific Fleet spokesman Lt. Cmdr. Tim Gorman said the Chinese destroyer approached within 45 yards (41 meters) of the Decatur’s bow. China said the Luoyang, a Chinese missile destroyer, was deployed to identify the U.S. warship and drive it away near Chinese territory.

Gaven is claimed by China, the Philippines, Vietnam and Taiwan. Malaysia and Brunei also have claims in the South China Sea.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who is on a visit to southern Davao city in the Philippines, said in a separate news conference that some "non-regional countries" were stirring up trouble in the disputed waters and "have been showing off their force."

Wang said China and Southeast Asian nations should guard against foreign interference. China has repeatedly criticized what it says is U.S. meddling in an Asian territorial dispute.

"We shall work together to be vigilant against and prevent interferences and disruptions coming from the outside as China and the Philippines and other littoral states of the South China Sea are cooperating to uphold peace and cooperation," Wang said.

The Chinese and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
have set up telephone hotlines to allow them to communicate rapidly to prevent any conflict from getting out of control in the disputed waters. Other possible arrangements are being discussed for ships and aircraft, he said.

“Mechanisms of this kind can effectively avoid misjudgment, prevent unexpected incidents,” Wang said. “China is also willing to build similar mechanisms with other claimant states so as to enhance communication and timely handle the emergencies should they happen.”
 
Chinese military aircraft enters S. Korea's air defense identification zone ...
... in SCS, South Korea, right? LOL
timepass

I've reported you four times during last four days for spamming, 1914 news, years old pictures, pretty much nothing happened to you, so you know what, you won, this forum will get what it deserves

 

timepass

Brigadier
China’s top diplomat will arrive in the Philippines on Sunday for talks with its top officials

CHINA / PHILIPPINE - China’s top diplomat will arrive in the Philippines on Sunday for talks with its top officials, as analysts said the two countries could be close to a deal on joint energy exploration in the disputed South China Sea. During his two-day trip, Foreign Minister Wang Yi will meet Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte and Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jnr in Davao City, according to a media advisory issued by the Philippines’ Department of Foreign Affairs on Friday.

He will also sit down with other government officials to discuss the Southeast Asian nation’s infrastructure plan, known as “Build, Build, Build”, and several bilateral documents will be signed, the advisory said, without elaborating. Chinese analysts said the two countries were eager to reach a deal on joint energy exploration, but that problems remained with regards to their, and other nations’, competing claims in the disputed waterway.

44916350_1749869721790582_984925688479875072_n.jpg


“Joint exploration with the Philippines will set a good example in the South China Sea,” said Xu Liping, a professor at the Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

“It will strengthen China’s interests in the area and also decrease the chances of countries from outside the region interfering.”
But any such cooperation would have to comply with the Philippines’ constitution and laws, while working out how to distribute the profits from any ventures would be a challenge to overcome, he said. Xu said the visit by Wang, who is a member of the State Council, China’s cabinet, could also pave the way for President Xi Jinping to travel to Manila in the coming weeks. The Philippines’ former foreign secretary Alan Peter Cayetano said in August, while still in office, that the two countries were making plans for such a trip before the end of the year.

Cayetano said also that the start of the joint exploration project was “quite near” and contingent on China agreeing to a legal framework for the process. The two sides set up a panel to discuss the technical details of the venture in February.

Cayetano said earlier that the Philippines was open to a proposal in which it took 60 per cent of the profits and China 40 per cent. He also mentioned that Reed Bank, which sits within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone, was a possible site for exploration. Su Hao, director of the Asia-Pacific Research Centre at China Foreign Affairs University in Beijing, said the two countries would have to formulate a plan that served not only their interests, but also those of other claimants in the region.

They would also have to be wary of a possible backlash from groups within the Philippines, including members of the political elite, that have traditionally favoured cooperation with the US, as opposed to Duterte’s current policy of building closer ties to China.
Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan also hold territorial claims to the South China Sea, through which some US$3.4 trillion worth of trade passes every year.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
now noticed the tweet
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





A meteorological observation station for Yongshu, Meiji, and Zhubi reefs in the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
officially began operating on Wed, providing fishermen and ships sailing in the area more accurate weather reports, said China Meteorological Administration

Dq0BI4YXQAAlYX-.jpg
 

Strategic Analyst

New Member
Registered Member
Robert D. Kaplan is certainly not a neo-liberal cheerleader. His work over the last three decades has consistently portrayed the world in stark, neo-realist terms. His view that the United States is increasingly constrained by the "Tyranny of Distance" in regard to SCS and Eastern hemisphere in general should be no surprise to you if you are remotely read on the subject matter.
Kaplan compares the US-Caribbean-Panama Canal to the China-SCS-Strait of Malacca. But that is a fallacy, because the Panama Canal was wholly US built and owned, whereas the Strait of Malacca is a natural geographic feature which can be sailed around on the south side of Indonesia with only a minor detour in terms of sea navigation, unlike a Cape Horn detour. Kaplan lacks a grasp of geography and is simplistic. Kaplan has no significant SCS analysis.
 

Strategic Analyst

New Member
Registered Member
Regarding SCS, Kaplan of Strafor compares Spain's founding and defense of Latin American nations surrounding the Caribbean to US involvement in the SCS area. History shows the US did not found the nations surrounding the SCS. While Spain had a justified reason to retain Caribbean sea lane control to it's Latin American colonies/nations, the US has none, absolutely none to any nation surrounding the SCS. Kaplan lacks an education in history of the SCS.
 
Kaplan compares the US-Caribbean-Panama Canal to the China-SCS-Strait of Malacca. But that is a fallacy, because the Panama Canal was wholly US built and owned, whereas the Strait of Malacca is a natural geographic feature which can be sailed around on the south side of Indonesia with only a minor detour in terms of sea navigation, unlike a Cape Horn detour. Kaplan lacks a grasp of geography and is simplistic. Kaplan has no significant SCS analysis.

Regarding SCS, Kaplan of Strafor compares Spain's founding and defense of Latin American nations surrounding the Caribbean to US involvement in the SCS area. History shows the US did not found the nations surrounding the SCS. While Spain had a justified reason to retain Caribbean sea lane control to it's Latin American colonies/nations, the US has none, absolutely none to any nation surrounding the SCS. Kaplan lacks an education in history of the SCS.

The US-Caribbean to China-SCS comparison is much less accurate and less useful than a US-Caribbean-Central America-Northern South America to China-SCS-Southern ECS-Ryukyus-Taiwan-SE Asia comparison.
 
Top