China's power projection capability

Why does anyone believe, China or Russia would ally themselves with the USA, in order to attack a country with whom they enjoy excellent trade and friendly diplomatic relations?

The fact that both China & Russia both agreed to "inform" the UN about Irans activities are I think being mis-understood. In the UK we have "Inquiries". Here matters are held, usually behind looked doors, hearings last a very long time and are usually inconclusive or deliver non damning conclusions.

This is the case here. Just like Saddams Trial, it will go on for a long time and get nowhere.

In the meantime everybody has to wait, and any Unilateral action will be strictly unauthorised and highly Illegal. Q.E.D.

SampanViking said:

Why does anyone believe, China or Russia would ally themselves with the USA, in order to attack a country with whom they enjoy excellent trade and friendly diplomatic relations?

The fact that both China & Russia both agreed to "inform" the UN about Irans activities are I think being mis-understood. In the UK we have "Inquiries". Here matters are held, usually behind looked doors, hearings last a very long time and are usually inconclusive or deliver non damning conclusions.

This is the case here. Just like Saddams Trial, it will go on for a long time and get nowhere.

In the meantime everybody has to wait, and any Unilateral action will be strictly unauthorised and highly Illegal. Q.E.D.

Click to expand...

Because Russia and China are not taking Iran's side purely on the basis of trade benefits. China and Russia, by "supporting" Iran on a political basis, do it to frustrate US influence in the region. They know that their influence on traditional US allies (Saudi, Kuwait, Egypt, UAE, etc) are marginal at best, so they try to balance it by trying to "support" US hostile regimes like Iran and Syria. Power politics my friend, that is the basis of support for Iran from Russia and China. It is not for some noble goals becuase ORthodox Russia and Buddist China do not have a lot in common with Shia Muslim Iran.

FYI Russia and China enjoy trade benefits with the USA that are several magnitude to that with Iran. Heck South Korea, EU, Taiwan have do more business with China in a month than Iran does for a year.

Hi Don't

First off I think the idea of looking at what kind of forces the PLA would contribute to a UN organised Coalition is a perfectly valid and interesting one, it is only the scenario I find unrealistic.

Iran is a major supplier of Oil to China (all of China's oil supplies are critical, especially in terms of securing uninterrupted long term supply), hence any disruption of supply due to Military action, let alone total loss of supply to a US Occupier, would be unacceptable and resisted. This takes no account of other Geopolitical issues in allowing the US open access to Central Asia.

In terms of trade, you are looking at the wrong comparison. US trade accounts (I believe) for about 25% of China's export business. China obviously does not wish to lose that market, but is still going to worry more about the other 75%, a ever greater proportion of which is coming from the developing world, which views China as a "benign" non-interefering partner.

I am not quite sure whether you are agreeing with my view or challenging it. I still maintain that China is most interested in losing the entire issue in the beaurocratic maze of UN Diplomacy, frustrating, delaying and obstructing the process, without having to directly oppose.

But still a scenario is a scenario, the US joining China and Russia in a mission to occupy and Disincorporate the State of Isreal is another, want to join in? :roll:

renmin said:

Acutually, beleive it or not, Kim's got more than half of his nukes pointed at China, isnt that a big threat? Kim has already gone nuclear, may be not long range weapons but can still hit China. But we've pointed our nukes at him too .Mid eastern or not, China would not get involved in any conflict unless there is a good reason (and I mean very GOOD).

Click to expand...

it was estimated kim had 6-8 nuclear warheads, but no working system to ferry the warheads to china.

No need to nuke kim. If he ever launches a pre-emptive strike with a ballistic missle, some s-300 will probably shoot it down. The plaaf would have absolutely no trouble dealing with the NKAF, which still uses mig-19s, and has 2 dozen fulcrum As as theri most advanced plane. 3 pla armored division would be outside of pyongyang in a day. Not a bad way to test out new weapons. I doubt anyone would care, rather the prc would be seen as a hero.

attack iran?! people in china r currently arguing how could PLA help Iran to resist possible US invasion !
Iran is china's only ally in the mid-east plus it provide china 20 million tons of oil every year! for china, the relationship with Iran even has more strategic value then DPRK!
and as for the topic, china is serious lack of projection capability, PLA doesn't have aircarft-carrier, advance long-range bomber, and oversea armybases...PLA has always been a defensive force(that's policy as well) ,but it's about to change very soon. after years of military buildup, PLA start to setting their eye on offensive weapons...