China's Defense/Military Breaking News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


BEIJING (Reuters) - China's Defence Ministry on Thursday accused Japanese air force jets of locking their radars on to Chinese military aircraft, acting provocatively and endangering safety, after Japan said it is scrambling a record number of fighter jets.

China and Japan have long been mired in a territorial dispute over a group of tiny, uninhabited East China Sea islands, called the Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China.

Patrol ships and fighter jets from Asia's two biggest economies have been shadowing each other on and off near the islets, raising fears that a confrontation could result in a clash.

In the six months ending in September, Japanese fighters scrambled to chase Chinese planes 407 times compared with 231 times in the same period last year, the Japanese Air Self-Defence Force said in mid-October, an increase of about three-quarters.

Chinese Defence Ministry spokesman Wu Qian said Chinese air force activities accorded with international law and norms, and that it was Japan which was increasing its monitoring and interfering in normal training exercises.

"What is more, when aircraft of the Japan Self-Defence Forces encounter Chinese aircraft, their radars light up, they let off infrared jamming projectiles and show other unprofessional, dangerous provocative behavior," Wu said at a monthly briefing.

"This endangers the safety Chinese aircraft and personnel and is the root of the China-Japan maritime and air problem."

China urges Japan to adopt a responsible attitude and prevent such incidents from happening, he added.

Japan worries that as China increases its control over the South China Sea, it is turning its attention to expanding its influence in the East China Sea and into the western Pacific.

China insists regular patrols in the region are its right and intended to protect national security and sovereignty.

Tokyo's support for a July ruling by an arbitration court in the Hague that invalidated China's sweeping claims in the disputed South China Sea, a case brought by the Philippines, has also angered Beijing.

China refuses to recognize that decision and says countries not directly involved in the disputes, namely the United States and Japan, should not get involved.

Japan is strengthening its ties in the region, in particular with the Philippines and Vietnam, which contest China's claims to parts of the sea, and it aims to help build the capacity of coastal states in the busy waterway.

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said on Thursday his country could join naval exercises with Japan.
 

weig2000

Captain
Sort of a sneak preview of the upcoming annual report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. The new focus will be on China's power projection capabilities. The final report will be released Nov. 16.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
November 4, 2016

China’s military is developing ships, submarines, aircraft, intelligence systems and foreign bases in a bid to become a global military power, according to a forthcoming congressional China commission report.

The late draft of the annual report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission contains a chapter on Beijing’s power projection development and warns that once fully developed, the weapons and forces could contribute to a regional conflict in places like the South China and East China Seas.

“China is building military capabilities to deal with hostile air, surface, and subsurface operational environments in the ‘far seas,'” the report states, noting that the operations expand the focus beyond the two island chains off China’s eastern and southern coasts.

The new military capabilities will “expand or improve the ability of the People’s Liberation Army to conduct a range of externally focused operations, to include combat insertion, island landing operations, humanitarian assistance/disaster relief operations, noncombatant evacuation operations, and peacekeeping missions,” states the report.

The report also warns that expanded military power projection capabilities could “also strengthen China’s traditional war-fighting capabilities against weaker neighbors.”

“Given its enhanced strategic lift capability, strengthened employment of special operations forces, increasing capabilities of surface vessels and aircraft, and more frequent and sophisticated experience operating abroad, China may also be more inclined to use force to protect its core interests,” the report says.

The final report will be released Nov. 16. A commission spokeswoman described the chapter as a late draft.

Expeditionary warfare capabilities outlined in the chapter include six large amphibious transport docks and a new class of amphibious assault ships, new aircraft carriers, and advanced guided missile warships as escorts for far seas operations by China.

The naval expeditionary forces also will be bolstered by three types of attack submarines, including nuclear-powered, diesel electric and air-independent powered submarines. All three types were recently deployed to the Indian Ocean to support Chinese anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden.

Its six nuclear-powered Type-093 submarines are being augmented by two even more advanced nuclear submarines that by 2020 will make China the third most powerful state for attack submarines, behind the United States and Russia.

New aircraft also are being added to the PLA for long-range operations. China is deploying a new Y-20 transport that is similar to the US C-17 and Beijing will co-produce a version of the Russian An-225 transport, the largest cargo aircraft in the world.

To fill out its logistics network, China’s military is building new fueling ships and will have 10 oilers by 2020.

Overseas bases will also contribute to the power projection capability, including a new military base in Djibouti, on the Horn of Africa. Civilian ports constructed by China in Sri Lanka and Pakistan also will provide for strategic power projection.

To keep tabs on threats to long-distance forces and provide them with intelligence, China is also developing global intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities. They include long-range drone aircraft, space-based sensors, and shore-based radar and intelligence-gathering ships.

The commission suggests that China’s deployments for international peacekeeping operations — 27,000 troops were sent on UN missions over the past 15 years — will provide valuable experience for future long-range combat, as well as for internal security.

In a section on implications for the United States, the report states that the pursuit of long-distance warfare capabilities “coupled with the aggressive trends that have been displayed in both the East and South China seas, are compounding existing concerns about China’s rise among U.S. allies and partners in the greater Asia,” the report states.

Despite the development of far seas capabilities, the Chinese war planning will remain devoted to preparing for regional conflicts with Taiwan or over maritime disputes in the South China and East China Sea.

Analysts say the commission’s focus on PLA expeditionary warfare is welcome — after years of intelligence analysis that incorrectly argued China had no interest in long-range power projection.

“While the Obama Administration has been overwhelmed trying to respond to Chinese aggression growing almost daily in the Asia-Pacific region, the US China Commission is correct in its most recent annual report to highlight the future threats to US interests in the coming decades from China’s ambitions for global power projection,” said Richard Fisher, a China military analyst.

“Early in the last decade, there were many PLA analysts who derided the idea that the PLA would develop global power projection capabilities, but these have been well described by the latest US China Commission report,” said Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

Fisher urged greater American investment in new high-technology and asymmetric warfare capabilities to meet the emerging Chinese threats.

“Continued American global leadership for the future will also depend on much large US investment in power projection capabilities to stay ahead of China,” Fisher added.

Among the recommendations of the commission are to fund greater Pentagon and US intelligence analysis of PLA power projection capabilities, and for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps to conduct more joint exercises with Japan, Philippines and Vietnam focused on countering amphibious landing operations, like those anticipated by China.

The commission also recommended that the Pentagon conduct an assessment of Chinese long-range warfare capabilities with the goal of developing “non-kinetic options for the department to pursue that counter emerging PLA expeditionary logistics capabilities in peacetime to erode the effectiveness of PLA expeditionary logistics capabilities in support of Chinese offensive operations in the Indo Pacific in the future.”

Greater Chinese far seas military deployments will increase the risk of US-China naval and other confrontations. The report included a list of Chinese harassments of US Navy ships and aircraft since 2001, when a Chinese jet collided with an EP-3 spy plane.

In the South China Sea, the 3,200 acres of new Chinese islands will give Beijing “persistent civil-military bases to enhance its long-term presence in the South China Sea significantly,” the report said.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Sort of a sneak preview of the upcoming annual report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. The new focus will be on China's power projection capabilities. The final report will be released Nov. 16.
It's not hard to see the preview with jaundiced eyes, because the a few years ago, same community of defense experts dismissed CCP's military as backwards and with little ability to sustain operations beyond China's littorals. And now, the same people say the opposite. Talk about change of heart! But, why? I think it's because these people, mainly neocons and liberal interventionists, are seriously concerned about losing US primacy in Asia, and they want greater defense expenditures to support a more aggressive containment strategy. I suspect we'll see many more of these reports in the coming months.
 

dingyibvs

Junior Member
5 stages of grief, for these veterans a few years ago they were in denial, now we're seeing the transition from anger to bargaining. The J-20's unveiling seems to caught the attention of a lot of newbies, and we're suddenly seeing a surge of newbies just entering into the denial stage.
 
Another tease like the SAM deal? Developing the SCO as a trade rather than security block? Keep friends close and terrorist-sponsoring frenemies closer? Coming together of the pre-WWI Eurasian empires?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


WORLD NEWS | Mon Nov 21, 2016 | 9:46am EST
China says would consider Turkish membership of security bloc

China said on Monday it was willing to consider any application from NATO-member Turkey to join a Russian and Chinese-led security bloc, after Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said his country could join.

China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan formed the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in 2001 to fight threats posed by radical Islam and drug trafficking from neighboring Afghanistan.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said Turkey was already a "dialogue partner" of the regional bloc and had for a long time closely cooperated with it.

China attached great importance to Turkey's wish to strengthen that cooperation, he told a news briefing.

"We are willing, together with other members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and in accordance with the rules of its legal documents, to seriously study it on the basis of consensus consultation," Geng added, without elaborating.

Erdogan was quoted on Sunday as saying that Turkey did not need to join the European Union "at all costs" and could instead become part of the SCO.

Turkish government spokesman Numan Kurtulmus said on Monday that closer ties with the SCO would not mean Turkey turning its back on other allies.

"Turkey, with its history, culture, geopolitics and potential, is one of the few countries in the world that can cooperate with every corner of the world simultaneously," he told a news conference in the capital Ankara.

"A step taken (with the SCO) does not mean it will end Turkey’s relations with another country."

Turkish membership of the bloc would nonetheless be likely to alarm Western allies and fellow NATO members.

Having long been critical of Turkey's record on democratic freedoms, European leaders have been alarmed by Erdogan's crackdown on opponents since a failed coup attempt in July, and Turkey's prospects of joining the EU look more remote than ever after 11 years of negotiations.

The EU is treading a fine line as it needs Turkey's help in curbing a huge flow of migrants, especially from Syria, while Ankara has grown increasingly exasperated by what it sees as Western condescension.

Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan speak Turkic languages, and Ankara signed up in 2013 as a "dialogue partner" saying it shared "the same destiny" as members of the bloc.

Mongolia, India, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan are observers, while Belarus, like Turkey, is a dialogue partner.

(Reporting by Ben Blanchard in Beijing and Tuvan Gumrukcu in Ankara; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore and Andrew Roche)
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
It's not hard to see the preview with jaundiced eyes, because the a few years ago, same community of defense experts dismissed CCP's military as backwards and with little ability to sustain operations beyond China's littorals. And now, the same people say the opposite. Talk about change of heart! But, why? I think it's because these people, mainly neocons and liberal interventionists, are seriously concerned about losing US primacy in Asia, and they want greater defense expenditures to support a more aggressive containment strategy. I suspect we'll see many more of these reports in the coming months.

More of these reports in the coming months? We've been seeing and reading it for over a decade.o_O These people's heart are twisted and not worth any American dollars and lives for their status quo ambition.
 
Ready for it?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


POLITICS | Sun Dec 11, 2016 | 10:09am EST
Trump says U.S. not necessarily bound by 'one China' policy

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump questioned whether the United States had to be bound by its longstanding position that Taiwan is part of "one China" and brushed aside Beijing's concerns about his decision to accept a phone call from Taiwan's president.

"I fully understand the 'one China policy,' but I don't know why we have to be bound by a 'one China policy' unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things, including trade," Trump said on an interview with Fox News Sunday.

The congratulatory call that Trump accepted from Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen was the first such contact with Taiwan by a U.S. president-elect or president since President Jimmy Carter switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 1979, acknowledging Taiwan as part of "one China."

Taiwan is one of China's most sensitive policy issues, and China generally lambastes any form of official contact by foreign governments with Taiwan's leaders.

In the Fox interview, Trump criticized China over its policies on issues such as currency, the South China Sea and North Korea and said it was not up to Beijing to decide whether he should take a call from Taiwan's leader.

"I don't want China dictating to me and this was a call put into me," Trump said. "It was a very nice call. Short. And why should some other nation be able to say I can't take a call?"

"I think it actually would've been very disrespectful, to be honest with you, not taking it," Trump added.

(Reporting By Caren Bohan; Editing by Phil Berlowitz)
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Ready for it?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Trump and some his backers simply don't appreciate how sensitive the "One China" policy is, and the consequence of playing games with it. One thing I'm absolutely certain is if Taiwan announces independence, there will be war. And if meddling great and near-great powers like US, Japan, or India join Taiwan in the civil war, then the war would spread.

There's a Chinese proverb about keeping power away from the ambitious, as one would keep sharp knives away from fools. Trump is that fool.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
Trump and some his backers simply don't appreciate how sensitive the "One China" policy is, and the consequence of playing games with it. One thing I'm absolutely certain is if Taiwan announces independence, there will be war. And if meddling great and near-great powers like US, Japan, or India join Taiwan in the civil war, then the war would spread.

There's a Chinese proverb about keeping power away from the ambitious, as one would keep sharp knives away from fools. Trump is that fool.

Uh, no. Even if Taiwan declares utter independence and threatens to attack the mainland, the presence of the US 7th Fleet (and others) in the regions would deter any Chinese aggression. The ChiComs know better than to start a war that would ultimately end with US + NATO troops accepting an unconditional surrender in Beijing. The chances of war decreases with more of China's neighbors becoming hostile to Beijing.

What Trump should do is to leverage the Chinese emphasis on the One-China policy and force Beijing to stop (1) illegal dumping of steel & other export product, (2) manipulating their currency, (3) demanding import tariffs on US trade to China.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top