China's Defense/Military Breaking News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm surprised they didn't already have a ban in place. Smartwatches and things like Google Glass have been around for a few years even though Apple's smartwatch just came out.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China imposes smartwatch and wearable tech army ban
13 May 2015

China has forbidden its armed forces from wearing internet-connected wearable tech, according to reports.
The People's Liberation Army Daily, the Chinese military's official newspaper, said security concerns had been raised after one recruit had received a smartwatch as a birthday gift.
News site NBC said its sources had confirmed a ban was now in place.
One expert said the move was a natural extension of restrictions already placed by most armies on mobile phones.
The PLA Daily said army leaders had sought the advice of experts last month after being alerted to an incident in which a soldier had tried to use a smartwatch to take a photo of his comrades stationed at the eastern city of Nanjing.
It said the country's agency responsible for protecting state secrets subsequently issued the following decree: "The use of wearables with internet access, location information, and voice-calling functions should be considered a violation of confidential regulations when used by military personnel."
The newspaper reported that teaching materials and warning signs had subsequently been created to ensure that the message was spread among military personnel.
"The moment a soldier puts on a device that can record high-definition audio and video, take photos, and process and transmit data, it's very possible for him or her to be tracked or to reveal military secrets," it added.
A spokeswoman from the UK's Ministry of Defence was unable to provide a statement about its own rules.
But the BBC understands that it does not currently prevent the use of devices that receive or transmit information unless personnel are operating in a security sensitive environment or on operations.
One expert suggested, however, that the rise of wearable tech posed a challenge to military forces across the globe.
"Any self-aware organisation will have measures for operational security," said Peter Quentin, a research fellow at the British defence think tank Rusi.
"Anything that is networked - whether it is in your pocket or on your wrist - can be remotely accessed and exploited by others to provide an advantage to adversaries.
"That can happen inadvertently or be done deliberately, so it needs to be controlled wherever possible.
"It's why you already see leaving of phones outside of areas where sensitive discussions take place."
He added, however, that there could sometimes be benefits from letting soldiers use wearable tech beyond battlefield duties.
Mr Quentin highlighted the case of Our War, a BBC Three documentary series that made use of footage filmed by British troops who had fitted small video cameras to their helmets.
Officials had initially tried to clamp down on the troops' personal use of the kit before it became apparent that the resulting video was useful.
"It helped the Army communicate the realities of the operations in Afghanistan through the soldiers' own eyes, which was very powerful," Mr Quentin said.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
I'm surprised they didn't already have a ban in place. Smartwatches and things like Google Glass have been around for a few years even though Apple's smartwatch just came out.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yeah but does those smart watches and google type glasses be effective on the field in all terrain and conditions? It can be light but it has to be rugged like the night vision goggles.
 
Yeah but does those smart watches and google type glasses be effective on the field in all terrain and conditions? It can be light but it has to be rugged like the night vision goggles.

I think you misunderstood what the post was about. China just put a ban on soldiers using personal wearables while on sensitive sites or on duty, for the same reasons as banning cell phones and cameras. I am surprised such a ban was not in place already.
 
Report on China's latest defense white paper.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


White paper outlines China's "active defense" strategy
English.news.cn | 2015-05-26 18:19:23 | Editor: ying

Defense Ministry spokesperson Yang Yujun introduces the white paper about China's military strategy at a press conference in Beijing, capital of China, May 26, 2015. The white paper was released Tuesday. (Xinhua/Pan Xu)

BEIJING, May 26 (Xinhua) -- China issued its first white paper on military strategy on Tuesday, stressing "active defense" and pledging closer international security cooperation.

The white paper, "China's Military Strategy", issued by the State Council Information Office, outlined a strategy unifying strategic defense and operational and tactical offense.

The nearly 9,000-word paper also underscored "the principles of defense, self-defense and post-emptive strikes", adding that China "will not attack unless we are attacked, but we will surely counterattack if attacked".

In response to the evolving form of modern warfare and national security requirements, focus will be placed on "winning informationized local wars".

"The adjustment is necessary as long-range, precise, smart, stealthy and unmanned weapons and equipment are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and outer space and cyberspace have become new command posts," said Yan Wenhu, a researcher with the Academy of Military Science (AMS) of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA).

The armed forces will get better at operations based on information technology, the paper said.

They will also strengthen international security cooperation in areas considered especially important to China's overseas interests.

The paper goes on to highlight four "critical security domains": the ocean, outer space, cyberspace and nuclear force.

The PLA Navy will gradually shift its focus from a sole strategy of "offshore waters defense" to a combined one of "offshore waters defense and open seas protection".

The country will expedite the development of its "cyber force" to tackle "grave security threats" online.

China opposes a space arms race and vowed to secure its space assets.

The paper also underscored that China will never enter into a nuclear arms race and pledges to continue to contribute to world peace.

China's armed forces will lend more international peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance, under the plan.

ACTIVE DEFENSE

While this is the ninth defense white paper issued by China since 1998, it is the first to narrow in specifically on strategy, rather than the broader facts and figures of the country's military.

It focuses on the core and most sensitive questions concerning China's military and security policy, said Wen Bing, an AMS researcher.

China's socialist nature, fundamental national interests and the objective requirement of peaceful development all demand adherence to active defense, according to the paper.

"Some countries adopt preemptive strategies, emphasizing preventive intervention and taking initiative in attack. Ours is totally different," said Zhang Yuguo, senior colonel with the general staff department of the PLA, at a press conference on the white paper.

Being "active" is only a kind of means and "defense" is our fundamental purpose, he said.

It's because of adherence to this strategy that China has been able to enjoy a relatively stable environment for development and win international respect, said Chen Zhou, director of the national defense policy research center under the AMS.

No matter how strong China becomes, it will never deviate from this strategy and will not pursue military expansion, Chen said.

China opposes hegemony and power politics in all forms and will never seek expansion, according to the paper.

In response to a question from a foreign correspondent at the press conference, Defense Ministry spokesperson Yang Yujun said China has not built any military bases overseas.

Earlier this month, foreign media reported that China was building a permanent military base in the African country of Djibouti.

INCREASING THREATS

A world war is unlikely in the foreseeable future and the international situation is expected to remain generally peaceful, the paper noted.

However, it also warned of the outside threats of hegemony, power politics and "neo-interventionism".

Small-scale wars, conflicts and crises are recurrent in some regions. Therefore, the world still faces both immediate and potential threats of localized wars, according to the white paper.

China remains in a period of strategic opportunities for development, but it also faces multiple and complex security threats, as well as increasing external challenges. This means China still has the arduous task of safeguarding national unification, territorial integrity and development interests, according to the paper.

It warned of threats to China's maritime rights and interests, citing the provocative actions of some offshore neighbors, including reinforced, and illegal military presence in Chinese territory, and outside parties involving themselves in South China Sea affairs.

Yang labeled recent incidents in the South China Sea, including a U.S. military jet's controversial reconnaissance in the area, "old tricks" used to stir tensions and smear the reputation of Chinese armed forces.

The Navy has had to deal with the reconnaissance operations of U.S. warships and aircraft in Chinese territory around the South China Sea for a long time, he said. "Our responses are always necessary, legal and professional."

Characterizing the China-U.S. relationship as "generally favorable", Yang said the armed forces of the two countries had a common understanding.

As for the disputes between the two sides, he said China expects the United States to respect its core interests and major concerns and hopes that the two sides can work together to consolidate trust and manage their differences.

"China is working toward establishing positive interactions with the United States in the Asia-Pacific region and hopes that other countries in the region will jointly safeguard peace, security and stability," the spokesperson added.

China will strengthen defense dialogues, exchanges and cooperation, with the U.S military, according to the paper.

It said China will also continue to refine mechanisms for notifying other countries about planned military activity and codes of conduct for air and maritime encounters, so as to strengthen mutual trust, prevent risks and manage crises.

BLUE-WATER NAVY

The Chinese navy kept troops close to land from the 1950s to the end of the 1970s under the strategy of inshore defense. Since the 1980s, the Navy has realized a strategic transformation to offshore defensive operations.

The shift in the PLA Navy's focus to a combination of "offshore waters defense and open seas protection" is essential as China is facing rising challenges from the sea and the country is more reliant on maritime resources and energy, said Yu Miao, another AMS researcher.

The traditional mentality that control of the land is more important than control of the sea must be abandoned, and great importance has to be attached to managing the seas and oceans and protecting maritime rights and interests, said the paper.

The PLA Navy will enhance its capabilities for strategic deterrence and counterattack, maritime maneuvers, joint operations at sea, comprehensive defense and comprehensive support.

"Open seas protection" means that the navy should cooperate with other nations' forces in the open seas so as to achieve the common security of the international community, said AMS researcher Zhao Dexi.

"The new strategy does not change the defensive nature of the PLA Navy or China's resolution to safeguard world peace," Zhao said.

The navy has carried out escort missions for about 6,000 fleets from China and other countries. It has also sent its hospital ship, "Peace Ark", to Asian and African countries. Warships have been deployed to help evacuate citizens of China and other countries from conflict-hit Libya and Yemen in recent years.

It will become normal for China's navy to have a strong and diverse presence in the open seas, Zhao added.

Answering a question about China's only aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, and the possibility of it building another, spokesperson Yang said the Liaoning was conducting trials and military training.

He said at the press conference that China's aircraft carrier plan would take into consideration a complex set of factors, including economic and social development, as well as national defense and military construction needs.

Link to full text of the white paper in English on Xinhua:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
The military plans to hasten development of four “critical security domains” - the ocean, outer space, cyberspace and its nuclear force, it said.

“Long range, precise, smart, stealthy, and unmanned weapons and equipment are becoming increasingly sophisticated,” the paper said. “The form of war is accelerating its evolution to informatioinization.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

broadsword

Brigadier
Westward, Ho!
After this, African Infrastructure Investment Bank?

China Extending Its Economic Diplomacy To EU Infrastructure Fund
By Reuters on June 14 2015

BRUSSELS -- China will pledge a multibillion-dollar investment in Europe’s new infrastructure fund at a summit here June 29, according to a draft communique seen by Reuters. The investment will represent Beijing’s latest foray into checkbook diplomacy to win greater influence.

While the exact amount is still to be decided, the pledge is in line with China’s efforts to shape global economic governance at the expense of the U.S., and it will follow major European Union governments’ decisions to join the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) in defiance of Washington.

It is expected to come with a request for return investment in China’s westward infrastructure drive -- the so-called One Belt, One Road initiative -- constructing major energy and communications links across Central, West and South Asia to as far as Greece.

“China announced that it would make (X amount) available for co-financing strategic investment of common interest across the EU,” the draft final statement says, adding that agreements will be finalized at another meeting in September.

An EU diplomat said the Chinese contribution was likely to be “in the billions.”

EU and Chinese officials have told Reuters that Chinese banks are looking mainly at telecommunications and technology projects.

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, who will attend the summit in Brussels, will agree with EU leaders that the 315 billion euro ($354.69 billion) fund will “create opportunities for China to invest in the EU, in particular in infrastructure and innovation sectors.”

If sealed, the deal will be a success for European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, who faced skepticism last year when he proposed the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI), because EU governments are putting in little seed money.

France, Germany, Italy and Poland have each announced they will contribute 8 billion euros ($9.01 billion), while Luxembourg and Spain have pledged smaller contributions.

The bloc is relying mainly on private investors and development banks to fund projects selected from an initial list of almost 2,000 submitted by the EU’s 28 member states, ranging from airports to flood defenses, which together are worth 1.3 trillion euros ($1.46 trillion).

A big Chinese investment might raise questions about governance of the fund, which is so far strictly a European institution. An EU diplomat said it was not known whether China would seek representation commensurate with its stake.

The decision to invite China into an EU fund could cause some friction with Washington, which is wary of Beijing’s rising influence and upset that Europe rebuffed its calls to stay out of the AIIB.

China is already testing the U.S. dominance in Latin America, offering the region $250 billion in investment over the next decade, while Chinese companies have poured money into Africa to guarantee commodity supplies in exchange for building new hospitals, rail lines and roadways.

The U.S. and human-rights groups complain that China and its firms are wielding influence partly through corruption and turning a blind eye to labor and environmental standards and human rights. Similar criticisms were long leveled at Western multinational companies in developing countries.

EU-China Quid Pro Quo

Alessandro Carano, an adviser to the European Commission on the fund, defended the decision to welcome Chinese investors. “The purpose is to mobilize the liquidity in the market. We don’t differentiate among the owners of the funds,” Carano said. “China is a big investor already. We don’t want any prejudice.”

In return for its investment, China wants a quid pro quo with Europe, whereby European companies and governments would take a greater interest in President Xi Jinping’s One Belt, One Road initiative.

China aims to create a modern Silk Road economic belt with railways, highways, oil and gas pipelines, power grids, Internet networks, maritime and other infrastructure links across Central, West and South Asia to as far as Greece.

“We are looking for ways to build up synergies between the One Belt, One Road initiative and the Juncker plan to invest in good products,” China’s ambassador to the EU, Yang Yanyi, told Reuters, describing the exercise like a “dating agency” to line up the right European projects with Chinese money. “There is a strong political commitment, there is common ground for cooperation,” he said. “China is in a position to invest.”

Senior EU officials have already met with Chinese banks and technology companies

Present at one seminar attended by Reuters were executives and officials of the Bank of China, China Construction Bank Europe, HSBC Holdings PLC and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, as well as the Chinese telecoms companies Huawei Technology Co. Ltd. and ZTE Corp.

In addition, the European Commission is exploring whether the EU could become collectively a member of the AIIB, since the bank is open to “economic entities” rather than just states -- a term crafted to enable Taiwan to participate, but which could create a loophole for Brussels. That would require some capital contribution from the small EU external-relations budget. It remains to be seen whether EU states prickly about national sovereignty, such as Britain, agree to the EU joining the bank.

Meanwhile, an EU diplomat said the European Investment Bank has quietly been providing advice to China behind the scenes on best practices and governance standards in setting up the AIIB. “That has largely paid off so far,” he said.
 
This article probably fits best here. It gets the strategic context and the strategic questions right despite multiple dubious descriptions when getting into details. This is important as often times articles which focus on the details, regardless of whether they get that right, have a dubious framing of the strategic picture, perhaps deliberately.

One key correction to this article is when it mentions the Second Island Chain it is actually referring to the First Island Chain.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Why China is far from ready to meet the U.S. on a global battlefront
By David Axe June 22, 2015

Both of these statements are true:

1) China possesses a rapidly improving military that, in certain local or regional engagements, could match — and even defeat — U.S. forces in battle.

2) In military terms, China is a paper dragon that, despite its apparent strength, is powerless to intervene in world events far from its shores.

Seeing the distinction between these two ideas is the key to understanding China’s strategic aims, its military means and the threat, if any, that the country poses to its neighbors, the United States and the existing world order.

Beijing’s goals include “securing China’s status as a great power and, ultimately, reacquiring regional preeminence,” according to the 2015 edition of the U.S. Defense Department’s annual report on Chinese military power.

China is not a global military power. In fact, right now it doesn’t even want to be one.

But that doesn’t mean the world’s most populous country doesn’t pose a threat to the planet’s wealthiest and most powerful one. Yes, the United States and China are at odds, mostly as a result of China’s expanding definition of what comprises its territory in the western Pacific, and how that expansion threatens U.S. allies and the postwar economic order Washington was instrumental in creating.

China, however, still could not meet and match the U.S. military on a global battlefront. Beijing lacks the expertise, military doctrine and equipment to do so. The Chinese military has no recent combat experience and, as a consequence, its training regimens are unrealistic.

Beijing’s army, navy and air force may be flush with new equipment, but much of it is based on designs that Chinese government hackers and agents stole from the United States and other countries. Most of it has never been exposed to the rigors of actual combat, so it’s unclear how well it would actually work.

But that might not matter. China has no interest in deploying and fighting across the globe, as the United States does. Beijing is preparing to fight along its own borders and especially in the China seas, a far easier task for its inexperienced troops.

Because, with all its military handicaps, in its own region China could be capable of beating U.S. forces in battle.

The critical question is just how much the Pentagon should care.

Active defense

The brutal Japanese invasion and occupation of China during the 1930s and 1940s had a profound effect on modern China’s development. Prior to the mid-1980s, China’s military strategy was focused on one great fear — another invasion, in this case an overland attack by the Soviet Union.

Commensurate with the threat, Beijing’s military organization emphasized short-range, defensive ground forces. In essence, a Great Wall of men and metal.

The danger from the Soviet Union ebbed and, in 1985, the Chinese Communist Party revised its war strategy. The “active defense” doctrine sought to move the fighting away from the Chinese heartland. It shifted attention from China’s western land border to its eastern sea frontier — including Taiwan, which in the eyes of Beijing’s ruling Communist Party is a breakaway province.

But the new strategy was still largely defensive. “We attack only after being attacked,” the Chinese navy asserted in its contribution to the official active-defense doctrine. It’s worth noting that, in the party’s view, a formal announcement of full independence by Taiwan would be an “attack” on China’s integrity, justifying a retaliatory attack on the island nation.

Thirty years later, Beijing is still pursuing its offshore defense, if at a greater distance. It now encompasses island territory that China dared not actively claim until recently. Still, the strategy remains the same.

Which is why, for all the hundreds of billions of dollars Beijing has spent on its armed forces since the Chinese economy really took off in the late 1990s and 2000s — and even taking into account equipment optimized for an amphibious assault on Taiwan — Beijing still acquires mostly short-range, defensive weaponry.

Which is how China can possess the world’s second-biggest fleet of jet fighters after the United States — 1,500 jets versus Washington’s 2,800 — but only a mere handful of the aerial tankers that refuel fighters in mid-air, allowing them to fight battles far from their bases.

The U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps together operate more than 500 tankers. Because America fights all over the world.

Similarly, China’s navy is huge. With some 300 warships, it is second in strength only to the 500 vessels in service with the U.S. Navy and Military Sealift Command, which operates America’s transport and spy ships. But the Chinese navy, like its air force, is a short-range force. Beijing’s fleet includes just six logistics ships capable of refueling and resupplying other ships at sea, extending their sailing range.

America’s fleet includes more than 30 such vessels.

The upshot of Beijing’s emphasis on short-range forces is that the farther its troops fight from the Chinese mainland, the less effective they will be. It doesn’t help that Beijing has few close allies, which means virtually no overseas bases it can count on during conflicts. The Pentagon, by contrast, maintains many hundreds of overseas facilities.

Chinese forces simply cannot cross the ocean to confront the U.S. military in America’s own backyard. Nor does Beijing even want to do so. Meanwhile, U.S. forces routinely patrol within miles of China’s airspace and national waters, and Washington has taken it on itself to be the decisive if not dominant military power on every continent.

In the western Pacific, however, China does threaten U.S. military standing. The flipside of possessing a defensive, short-range navy and air force is that Beijing can quickly concentrate numerous forces across a relatively small geographic area. The large numbers help China compensate for the overall poor quality of its forces.

By contrast, the United States — because it must project forces over great distances and usually is in the process of doing so all around the world — can usually deploy only a small number of ships and planes to any particular place at any given time. Because they would be badly outnumbered, it might not matter that U.S. ships and planes are generally superior to their Chinese counterparts in a one-on-one fight.
...

Cont'd in next post due to 10K character limit.
 
Cont'd from previous post due to 10K character limit.

...
In a landmark analysis in 2008, the RAND Corporation, a California think tank, concluded that China would have a huge numerical advantage over the United States in any aerial battle near Taiwan. The size of the advantage would depend on whether U.S. forces staged from Kadena Air Base in Japan or Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. “China could enjoy a 3:1 edge in fighters if we can fly from Kadena,” the analysis warned, “about 10:1 if forced to operate from Andersen.” The report goes on to note that while American warplanes are generally technologically superior to their Chinese counterparts, they’re not 10 times superior.

Second island chain

But if China’s strategy is defensive, this argument goes, then the United States would only risk defeat in battle with the Chinese if Washington attacked first. And America wouldn’t ever attack China, right?

The depends on the definition of “attack.” Assault the Chinese mainland? Most certainly not. But the United States and most other countries equate an attack on their interests with an attack on their soil. And increasingly, China is expanding the definition of its interests and the extent of its soil.

For one, if Taiwan ever formally announced its independence — and make no mistake, Taiwan is already fully independent — China vows it would invade. Because the integrity of historical China, including the island of Formosa that became Taiwan in 1949, is firmly within China’s current definition of its core interests.

China also claims islands in the East and South China seas that Taiwan, Vietnam, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei are claiming. The islands themselves are essentially beside the point; it’s the waters around them, and the oil and natural gas below that the countries are so eager to secure for themselves.

Though those disputes are not new, as China’s economy and military have developed, its claims have grown more assertive. In late 2014, China greatly escalated these territorial disputes when it began dredging isolated reefs in contested waters, piling sand into artificial islands, atop which it built piers, airstrips and other military facilities, transforming the islands into outposts.

The outposts make it increasingly unlikely the claimant countries will find easy, peaceful solutions to their conflicts.

The United States maintains military alliances with Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan and, to a lesser extent, Vietnam. Washington is also committed to maintaining freedom of navigation for commercial ships in international waters — a key factor of global free trade. If any of the above countries goes to war with China, the United States could get drawn in, too. And on China’s turf, where Beijing’s short-range forces are most useful.

Fighting in its own region, China is a military power to be reckoned with. Fighting far from home against U.S. troops, the Chinese would be hopelessly outmatched, assuming they could even reach the battlefield.

The trick for the United States is to avoid going to war with China on China’s terms without also surrendering the western Pacific to Chinese control. That means talk — backed up by the threat of force. “The United States seeks to develop a constructive relationship with China,” the Pentagon states in its China report, “that promotes security and prosperity in Asia and around the world.”

The report continues: “At the same time, the strategy acknowledges there will be areas of competition, and underscores that the United States will manage this competition with China from a position of strength.”

But there’s a bluff in this approach. In the only region where China’s actions pose a serious threat to U.S. interests, Washington struggles to maintain a position of strength. Beijing has carefully matched clear and restrained strategic goals with more than adequate military means.

That’s a powerful combination.
 

Ultra

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on Thursday, July 2nd, 2015

China has made breakthroughs in the anti-jamming capability of its Beidou satellite navigation system (BDS), the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Daily said Thursday.

The new technology, developed by Wang Feixue and his team from the National University of Defense Technology, has made the satellites 1,000 times more secure, the newspaper said.

In March, China launched the 17th BDS satellite, the first step in expanding the regional system to a global one.

The first BDS satellite was launched in 2000 to provide an alternative to foreign satellite navigation systems. In December 2012, the system began to provide positioning, navigation, timing and short message services to China and some parts of the Asia Pacific.

The BDS global network will have 35 satellites, five of which will be in geostationary orbit. The complete network should be installed by 2020.




What do you guys reckon is the technology behind this sudden 1000 times more secure, jam-resistant capability?
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on Thursday, July 2nd, 2015

China has made breakthroughs in the anti-jamming capability of its Beidou satellite navigation system (BDS), the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Daily said Thursday.

The new technology, developed by Wang Feixue and his team from the National University of Defense Technology, has made the satellites 1,000 times more secure, the newspaper said.

In March, China launched the 17th BDS satellite, the first step in expanding the regional system to a global one.

The first BDS satellite was launched in 2000 to provide an alternative to foreign satellite navigation systems. In December 2012, the system began to provide positioning, navigation, timing and short message services to China and some parts of the Asia Pacific.

The BDS global network will have 35 satellites, five of which will be in geostationary orbit. The complete network should be installed by 2020.




What do you guys reckon is the technology behind this sudden 1000 times more secure, jam-resistant capability?
Thousands times more secure and jam resistant, but with no details sounds like PR to raise company image and drum up business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top