China tests midcourse interceptor

Discussion in 'Strategic Defense' started by SinoSoldier, Jan 27, 2013.

  1. SinoSoldier
    Offline

    SinoSoldier Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    398
    Location:
    Alpha Centauri
  2. hardware
    Offline

    hardware Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    1
    likely a HQ-9 missile or possible two stage hq-9 variant and new solfware .during the desert storm, raytheon added additonal solfware allowing patriot missile to engage scud miisile.
     
    #2
  3. FarkTypeSoldier
    Offline

    FarkTypeSoldier Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    42
    What does a mid-course interceptor do?
     
    #3
  4. siegecrossbow
    Offline

    siegecrossbow Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,077
    Likes Received:
    403
    Location:
    Cedar Park, Texas
    Intercept incoming ballistic missiles during the mid-course versus terminal or boot stage. The missile already left atmosphere by this point.

    The HQ-9 missile is only good for terminal stage point defense. It is closer to the Patriot and S-300 in its designated role.
     
    #4
  5. no_name
    Offline

    no_name Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,024
    Likes Received:
    805
    Location:
    Auckland, NZ
    Any info on what is the type of BM being intercepted?
     
    #5
  6. clone7803
    Offline

    clone7803 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most likely the target is a DF-21.The DF-31 is too big and the DF-11 or DF-15 are short ranged. I don't think they will use the

    DF-4 as target which is too old.
     
    #6
  7. luhai
    Offline

    luhai Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think they probably did use DF-4 as target precisely because they're old. (PLA is cheap like that) The interceptor however is more interesting. Would it be DF-21 derived like before, or perhaps even DF-11 or DF-15 derivative.
     
    #7
  8. clone7803
    Offline

    clone7803 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe,but nothing comfirmed from the Xinhua news agency which only reported there was such a test.For the interceptor

    ,probably still is a DF-21 mutant DN or KT family missile.It will be interesting to see a DF-21 was knocked down by one of

    its mutant.
     
    #8
  9. icbeodragon
    Offline

    icbeodragon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Guess its meant mostly for India? No chance in hell anyone could stop a Russian or American nuclear strike in any significant manner.
     
    #9
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
  10. Hendrik_2000
    Offline

    Hendrik_2000 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    26
    Please check your fact first before posting . By definition when they say mid course intercept it mean exo atmospheric intercept and not terminal phase intercept. HQ-9 and Patriot are short range missile for mid course intercept you need at least 3 stages missile .

    Maybe this article below will help you understand difference between terminal and midcourse intercept

    China’s anti-missile test successful: govt - Globaltimes.cn
    China’s anti-missile test successful: govt
    Global Times | 2013-1-29 1:18:01
    By Xu Tianran


    China's second ground-based mid-course missile interceptor successfully completed an anti-missile test within Chinese territory on Sunday, hours after the US conducted a test flight of its own missile interceptor.

    There were no details available on China's test except for the official announcement that "the test has reached the preset goal" and is "defensive in nature."

    It was the second time that China announced such an anti-missile test. A similar test was successfully conducted on January 11, 2010.

    Ground-based mid-course anti-missile tests, which involve highly complicated technology in detecting, tracking and destroying a ballistic missile flying in space, have only been attempted by China and the US.

    The success of the test, together with a series of other military equipment achievements including China's first aircraft carrier and the maiden flight of the Y-20 large transport aircraft on Saturday, has demonstrated the country's fast-growing ability to defend its own national security and deter any possible threats, the Xinhua News Agency commented Monday.

    A ballistic missile's mid-course phase begins after its engines burn out and the warhead begins coasting in space. After mid-course, the warhead of long-range and intercontinental ballistic missiles will re-enter the atmosphere with a velocity of about 20 times the speed of sound, making it very difficult to intercept with current terminal-phase interception systems, according to Lan Yun, a military observer and editor with Modern Ships magazine.

    Shao Yongling, a senior colonel from the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Second Artillery Command College, told people.com.cn that China's ground-based mid-course interception test was aimed at intercepting intercontinental ballistic missiles, and the test's technical requirements were much higher than that of short- to medium-range missile defense systems.

    According to Russia's Ria Novosti News Agency, the US Ground-Based Mid-course Defense (GMD) has a maximum interception altitude of 1,500 kilometers and interception range of 4,000 kilometers. In comparison, the US' terminal-phase interceptor Patriot PAC-3, which was used to defend Japanese territory during North Korea's controversial rocket launch last year, only has about 15 kilometers of maximum operational ceiling.

    "China is still far from forming an operational anti-missile shield, as the US has carried out at least 16 interception tests and China has only done two so far. Even the US GMD is far from mature," Lan said.

    "The initial tests may focus on the performance of the interceptor itself. A complete system will include not only land-based radars and interceptors, but also a surveillance satellite network, sea-based radar systems and a complete command and control center," Lan said.

    The Washington Free Beacon website suggested that the missile used in Sunday's test could have been a modified type of missile used in the 2007 anti-satellite (ASAT) test by the Chinese military, and that this kind of anti-missile test was "assessed to have furthered both Chinese ASAT and missile defense technologies."

    According to Reuters, PLA officials and documents in recent years have said developing anti-missile technology is one focus of defense spending.

    China's announcement of the test is meant to showcase its capabilities to its potential rivals, Hans Kristensen, an expert on China's military from the Federation of American Scientists, was quoted by the BBC as saying. But Kristensen did not say who the potential rivals are.

    Hours before Beijing's test, the US Missile Defense Agency successfully completed a flight test of a ground-based interceptor missile from Vandenberg Air Force Base, California on Saturday. A target missile was not planned for the flight test.

    The launch is part of an extensive series of tests initiated after testing was halted in early 2011 when a guidance error resulted in a failed intercept in December 2010.

    Xinhua stressed that China's test isn't targeting any other country.
     
    #10
Loading...

Share This Page