China most strategic location, Shantou Guandong.

Jiang ZeminFanboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
Do we know the condition of the Shantou harbor/port/coast? Is it deep enough for big ships? how about the tidal conditions? Is it in the path of a lot of typhoons? Does the geographic near Shantou make it defendable?

Choosing a military base is much more complex than simply its strategic location. Guangdong province has been doing import/export business along its long coast line for centuries (at least Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties). That's almost 1000 years. Shantou has never been a major player. You got to wonder why no one has bothered to choose Shantou throughout the centuries. Shantou is emerging to become a bigger commercial port. However, militarily, it is a completely different matter. We need more info about Shantou, other than its location...

Shantou was a major player during European colonialism times it was a big port. In 1860 Shantou(Swatow) became one of the free ports and started growing fast. In 1930s Shantou was one of the three biggest ports in China. You can see from the old architecture that during these times Shantou was booming.
Here you can see how Shantou old town looked in 2015, now in 2019 old town is almost renovated (the last pages).
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
What are the odds this virus is the work of the CIA right in time for the Chinese new year?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Just as much as the Easter Bunny is real. Seriously why people pander such ridiculous tosh is almost absurd to watch at times.
 

adiru

Junior Member
Registered Member
I suppose it could be a coincidence that China, the geopolitical adversary and economic enemy to the United States (according to the US itself), suddenly gets this mysterious virus seemingly more potent than SARS (which itself apparently only targeted Chinese ethnic DNA and left the white/Caucasin population untouched) at the worst possible timing and in the worst possible location. Wuhan being Chinese's central hub and this being the Chinese Lunar New Year, it has the highest ability to spread and go "super viral" whilst impacting the max amount of damage to the stability of the China, both in terms of having the max potential to cause political turmoil in the homeland (ruining people's new year, quarantinee and lockdowns of cities of unprecendeted porportion, causing many Chinese citizens to get angry etc) and doing the maximum amount of possible damaage to the Chinese economy, ruining the New Year in which consumerisms was supposed to be at its very highest points.

Even the SARS of 2003 had an negative impact on Chinese GDP by as much as 2%, and this could be much worse. Unsuprising without need for a single bullet fired or sanction imposed, it already managed to force China to self-impose the closure of its borders and cities, however temporarily that may be, on the world stage it is another "ding" for China's image and gives the propaganda mouthpieces of the West something else to gripe about, whilsts at the same time an attempt to cap Chinese One Belt One Road ambitions and sabetage China's growing economy and hegemonic rise. It comes right on the crisp of Trump signing the fake "Trade Deal" and the UK decided to go against the US and work with Huawei.... I say something else is going on behind the scenes, more than what we are being told. We could have transition from Trade War, to Tech War to now maybe bioware, if that is the case, then very likely the US already fired the first shot, so to speak.

China should at least stay vigilant and have a credible detterence contingency plan in place...

In the nuclear world in which China has DF-41, the "MAD" doctrine is still well in place. But a mystery virus affords far more "plausible deniability" for the US. Thus achieving the goal with less fear of attribution and thus retribution. Instead of directly confronting China in the SCS militaristically immediately, maybe they think a better way to take China down a notch or two would be the use of "other means" to an ends...
 
Last edited:

SPOOPYSKELETON

Junior Member
Registered Member
I suppose it could be a coincidence that China, the geopolitical adversary and economic enemy to the United States (according to the US itself), suddenly gets this mysterious virus seemingly more potent than SARS (which itself apparently only targeted Chinese ethnic DNA and left the white/Caucasin population untouched) at the worst possible timing and in the worst possible location. Wuhan being Chinese's central hub and this being the Chinese Lunar New Year, it has the highest ability to spread and go "super viral" whilst impacting the max amount of damage to the stability of the China, both in terms of having the max potential to cause political turmoil in the homeland (ruining people's new year, quarantinee and lockdowns of cities of unprecendeted porportion, causing many Chinese citizens to get angry etc) and doing the maximum amount of possible damaage to the Chinese economy, ruining the New Year in which consumerisms was supposed to be at its very highest points.

Even the SARS of 2003 had an negative impact on Chinese GDP by as much as 2%, and this could be much worse. Unsuprising without need for a single bullet fired or sanction imposed, it already managed to force China to self-impose the closure of its borders and cities, however temporarily that may be, on the world stage it is another "ding" for China's image and gives the propaganda mouthpieces of the West something else to gripe about, whilsts at the same time an attempt to cap Chinese One Belt One Road ambitions and sabetage China's growing economy and hegemonic rise. It comes right on the crisp of Trump signing the fake "Trade Deal" and the UK decided to go against the US and work with Huawei.... I say something else is going on behind the scenes, more than what we are being told. We could have transition from Trade War, to Tech War to now maybe bioware, if that is the case, then very likely the US already fired the first shot, so to speak.

China should at least stay vigilant and have a credible detterence contingency plan in place...

In the nuclear world in which China has DF-41, the "MAD" doctrine is still well in place. But a mystery virus affords far more "plausible deniability" for the US. Thus achieving the goal with less fear of attribution and thus retribution. Instead of directly confronting China in the SCS militaristically immediately, maybe they think a better way to take China down a notch or two would be the use of "other means" to an ends...

Race specific viral warfare is completely implausible w/ this case since the coronavirus is using single stranded RNA. Single stranded RNA mutates much quicker than DNA, so any specificity to race will be lost over the course of the infection cycles. Being singled stranded is also what makes the virus so hard to pin down, since it quickly mutates past any vaccine you might make for it.

As you can see, there is a trade off here for your hypothetical bioweapon. In order for it to retain race specificity, it must be double stranded. But that would also decrease its mutation rate, making the virus easier to fight and kill.

Furthermore, there is the blowback from this weapon spreading to other countries. If this were truly a biological attack, WHO would have determined it an emergency and stopped global air traffic in order to minimize the spread. As you can see, that has not happened, and now the virus is inside the West as well.
 

adiru

Junior Member
Registered Member
In the nuclear world in which China has DF-41, the "MAD" doctrine is still well in place. But a mystery virus affords far more "plausible deniability" for the US. Thus achieving the goal with less fear of attribution and thus retribution. Instead of directly confronting China in the SCS militaristically immediately, maybe they think a better way to take China down a notch or two would be the use of "other means" to an ends...

Science and technology in the world has come a long way since the days of Westerners giving Native Americans blankets laced with smallpox to "thanksgiving" them. It is the human condition to be risk/loss adverse. A nation that would stop at nothing to achieve Maniesft Destiny surely wouldn't have any qualms of preserving its hegemony at all costs on the way down.

Similiar to the arms stockpile, I would think China would be well served to have a secret stockpile of bioweapons as "credible deterrence". Even if this had nothing at all to do with foreign external forces and was very coincidence just "natural" and "bad luck", then China still needs to recalibrate its posturings in that there are nations that will not let a "crisis go to waste" and will take full advantage of China while it is down. Steve Bannon was hoping to "break the back of the CCP" by cutting off China's supply chain, and was hoping the HK roits was going to catch fire in the rest of the mainland and force the CCP to lose control making it easier to do an opportunistic regime change.

So China needs to watch out for the far fetching implications of the impact of this new virus regardless of whether or not it was man-made. China should at least stay vigilant and have a credible deterrence contingency plan in place...

I'm sure both China and US have their own red lines. If the US had any involvement in this new virus, if China finds any credible evidence, then there are a number of things China can do besides retailiting with its own bioweapon... for example, we all know the Trade War is not about trade, but wanting China to slow down in terms of hegemonic rise... for example China could simply start building Huangyan Island in the SCS, making a move that would seal the US fate as the "falling empire". If China militarizes the island it would give China total control of the SCS region, so China can declare ADIZ over SCS, America would be pushed back to Guam, and it woulld be the beginning of the end of the petrodollar hegemony (which never could have lasted forever anyway but it would push it up along the timeline to make it collapse that much faster)

Some have said that well the virus is RNA single stranded which makes it harder to target any race specific without mutations losing the specificity over many infections cycles. And that if it were double stranded it would make it that much easier to create vaccines for and kill/contain. But I believe in this case it is about maintaining "plausible deniability" whilst not crossing any hard red lines in case attribution is established in the future. A virus outbreak that dings China's GDP by 2 to 3 % in 2020 is not comparable to an end of civilization event that wipes out 90% of the Chinese population, for example. Whatever blowback or collateral risk is considered acceptable levels since it was deployed to China's central Wuhan, naturally China has a self interest in containment, and the vast majority of the damage will be internal to China. It may have been engineerred as race specific single stranded RNA and knowingly by hostile forces that predicted by the time it lost its race specificity that China would have already contained it. Hence "mission accomplished" with little attribution and minimal blowback. What better way to undermine China/CCP than to have its population grow resentful of or turn against its very Government!? Already Western media is talking about how Chinese are filthy and if it wasn't for eating rats, bats, dogs, etc this wouldn't ever have befallen. Perfect cover for re-enforceing racists stereotypes for the ulterior motives of containing and isolating China, and that of Chinese culture, and Chinese ideology on the world stage.
 
Top