China Flanker Thread II

Discussion in 'Air Force' started by sumdud, Jan 12, 2008.

  1. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,552
    Likes Received:
    16,443
    That "pylon" kind of looks like the FLIR component of a targeting or navigation pod. We can see the forward facing aperture that would be consistent with a FLIR for navigation purposes, and we can also see that the pylon itself is bulkier than a normal weapons pylon yet it is also intended to clearly carry some kind of object below it.
    Many targeting or navigation pods have a FLIR component as part of the "pylon" which carries the pod.

    For example, the AN/AAQ-13 navigation pod. The AN/AAQ-13 is separated into two halves; the "top" half is a FLIR, while the bottom pod half is the terrain following radar.

    [​IMG]

    Various other targeting pods have similar arrangements where the "pylon" is a forward looking FLIR, and the actual pod component houses the main sensors.
    For example, the damocles, ATFLIR and J/AAQ-2 have a similar arrangement.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]




    For J-16, I would expect that pylon/FLIR to accommodate a targeting pod rather than a navigation pod, given few aircraft these days have dedicated terrain following radar pods like the F-15E (whose solution was elegant and capable but which most recent fighters have the ability to use onboard radar for terrain following)
     
    N00813, by78, Air Force Brat and 5 others like this.
  2. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    716
    Likes Received:
    687
    But j-16 already has FLIR...
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  3. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,552
    Likes Received:
    16,443
    J-16 has IRST, which may have a secondary FLIR role.

    But it's not exceptional for aircraft to have a dedicated FLIR for navigation. For example the Rafale often flies with Damocles which as the FLIR pylon as previously mentioned, despite its nose mounted OSF having an IRST with FLIR function as well.

    Think of the difference between a dedicated forward facing pylon FLIR and an IRST where the former is used specifically for navigation whereas the latter is more multirole and more powerful and can be traversed to focus on different targets. I'm sure I don't need to explain why having both functions could be useful.
     
    Tirdent, N00813, by78 and 2 others like this.
  4. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Lieutenant General
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    10,009
    Likes Received:
    26,059

    Indeed, and even more concerning that strange pylon spotted on the J-16 yesterday: On this J-16 prototype it is the same pylon even with the real pod attached. Looks like the Yings-III 330.

    J-16 + Yings III pylon.jpg
     
    DigoSSA, Tirdent, N00813 and 3 others like this.
  5. huitong
    Offline

    huitong New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    325
    Agreed!
     
    Air Force Brat and Deino like this.
  6. Scchwerter_
    Offline

    Scchwerter_ New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2019
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    43
    ummm If I may ask, why is the fact that the J16 is carrying a FILR pylon concerning? Is it because this indicates the possibility of J16's IRST is unable to be used as a navigation device?
     
  7. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Lieutenant General
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    10,009
    Likes Received:
    26,059

    Simply since it is a new observation and it fits nicely to the pylon we saw some time ago together with the Yings III pod ... so it might be possible that these J-16s are already using this pod and we only haven't seen it yet.
     
    N00813 and Air Force Brat like this.
  8. by78
    Offline

    by78 Brigadier

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,510
    Likes Received:
    32,397
    A few high-resolution images of J-11...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,552
    Likes Received:
    16,443
    I think what he meant is the choice of word "concerning". That word makes it seem like there's something wrong or flawed or incorrect.

    I think the word "interesting" (I.e. "even more interesting") may have been closer to what you meant.
     
    Scchwerter_, Deino and Air Force Brat like this.
  10. Scchwerter_
    Offline

    Scchwerter_ New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2019
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    43
    Thanks for the explanation a lot.
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page