RedMercury
Junior Member
The labels in the article were copied incorrectly to post 51. Also, the article seems to have picked the wrong photos for illustrations. The Kub photo in the article is clearly labeled Beech, i.e. Buk.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
China developing new generation of SAM
- Thread starter challenge
- Start date
Does anyone know how official is this site?
There seems to be some info about various weapon systems there, but I dont know how much of it is bull, it really depends on what sort of page is it, is it a serious government page or something else?
Here is a google translated article about hq9
this would be the link to the original in chinese
There seems to be some info about various weapon systems there, but I dont know how much of it is bull, it really depends on what sort of page is it, is it a serious government page or something else?
Here is a google translated article about hq9
this would be the link to the original in chinese
Ambivalent
Junior Member
The S-400 photo looks interesting -- I've only seen ones where the missile tubes are clustered together and not flat side-by-side. Does the launcher elevating platform extend the missiles out side-by-side like that for all S-300 style mobile launchers? Or is that some special non-standard configuration shown in the photo?
Uh, that's because it's an S-300V, not S-400.