China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

Discussion in 'Strategic Defense' started by peace_lover, Nov 4, 2005.

  1. ougoah
    Offline

    ougoah Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    1,787
    24 Avangard?! Wow that is either a gigantic ICBM or they've managed to make HGV and warheads tiny! I think this article is wrong there. I remember reading ICBMs carrying three or four Avangard at most. Hilarious levels of bullshit and inaccuracies in these national interest articles sometimes. R-28 is still a mobile ICBM not the same size as silo launched ICBMs.

    KuaiZhou series can be reworked to become ICBMs but they are not going to be TELed at current sizes. DF-41 is currently China's largest mobile ICBM and if a larger carrier gets mobile it's more to do with the TEL technology as opposed to the SLV. Unless of course rocket and fuel technology just improves by that much.
     
    Tirdent likes this.
  2. Just4Fun
    Offline

    Just4Fun Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2019
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    225
    Does China need to make so many mock-ups? How difficult to re-seal the 16 DF-17 missiles into their storage can after the parade? How much life span could be lost after a few hours exposure in Tienanmen Square, and during the whole period of parade preparation?

    From the angle they are positioned on the TEL during the parade, it is clear that the PLA wants people to have a very good view on the smooth and flat belly of the glider vehicle. Why did the PLA do this? Is it intended to assure that people can correctly identify they indeed are gliders? If the purpose is to send out an unambiguous message to American hawks, wouldn't using mock-ups compromise all the efforts?

    To me, unveiling DF-17 at this particular juncture is equivalent to firing a warning shot, kind like a silent version of "Don't say I didn't warn you before anymore!" It is possible that China wants to use this opportunity to warn US hawks not to risk US naval warships to do something stupid within the striking range of DF-17, i.e., in the South China Sea and in the Taiwan Strait, because China may have sensed Trump will gamble something really big to boost his chance of re-election, given the facts that Trump's trade war can go nowhere, his Iranian sanction sucks, and a recession is on the horizon.

    Trump has very strong narcissistic tendency. All of his misfortunes during his time in the White House can be traced down to his personality, overestimating his own cards, and underestimating his opponents' cards. If his yield to N. Korea, after Little Rocket Man insulted him with an H-bomb explosion and numerous missile firings, was because of his worry of China's intervention and of the vulnerability of the Eighth Army stationed in S. Korea, and if his yield to Iran, after the Turban Man insulted his by shooting down his expensive spy drone, was because of his worry of the vulnerability of US military bases in the Gulf countries, he may naively believe the US navy is immunized from enemy's attacks, thus may inadvertently use US naval warships to gamble something big. In this case scenario, the storage life span of these 16 DF-17s probably is the last thing China is concerned.

    Trump has to gamble within one year and these DF-16s may have to be used for combat missions within one year, why bother to put too much emphasis on their storage life span? This seems unreasonable.
     
    KIENCHIN likes this.
  3. ZeEa5KPul
    Offline

    ZeEa5KPul Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    757
    I've wondered why silo-based liquid fuelled missiles are so much larger and heavier than solid fuelled ones yet have the same warhead count. They have a much higher throw weight so should be able to carry multiple MIRV buses.
     
  4. azretonov
    Offline

    azretonov New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    51
    I cannot take your word, nor could I take you for serious anymore. I though we were talking about the present time with actual, existing platforms rather than some rumored SLV on paper, that could be operational beyond 2025. We are not even sure if the latter is actually being designed for this particular purpose -- just a rumor floating about.
     
    Yodello likes this.
  5. shanlung
    Offline

    shanlung New Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2017
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    48
    It is ok.
    Feeling the same..
    Will not be seeing any more of you.
     
    Yodello likes this.
  6. AndrewS
    Offline

    AndrewS Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2015
    Messages:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    2,813
    I think the solid-fueled Kuaizhou series were originally based on the CASIC military rockets, which already exist in TEL versions.

    A purely civilian rocket would use cheaper and higher performance liquid fuel that needs time to prep.
    Only the military needs instant launch availability from solid fueled rockets.
     
  7. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,242
    Likes Received:
    287
    The solid fuel is cheaper than the liquid.
    For military use it has benefits, but practically the solid is inferior in all regards compared to the liquid ones, apart from cost.
     
  8. antiterror13
    Online

    antiterror13 Colonel

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,217
    Likes Received:
    4,598
    huhhhhhhh :eek::eek::eek::eek:
     
  9. Broccoli
    Offline

    Broccoli Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    544
    RS-28 is a liquid-fueled missile what has size of an space rocket, so of course it can carry huge payload, remember that original R-36 Satan (RS-28 is supposed based on it) could carry over 30 warheads if needed.
     
  10. Broccoli
    Offline

    Broccoli Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    544
    Did theymention anything about DF-31 series missiles carrying mirvs? As far I know they only mentioned mirv capability with DF-41. I know Chinese did test DF-31 with mirvs few times but of course that doesn't mean it would a practical choice if range suffers too much.
     
Loading...

Share This Page