China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

escobar

Brigadier
XMAjZuH.jpg

87DeX4V.jpg

dbQYWU2.jpg

ZG1Q1xb.jpg

7abn17E.jpg
 

JayBird

Junior Member
when people mention the announcer who said df-26 can also be used against the ships - what wording, PRECISELY, was used? And more importantly, which announcer is that? A person who did a live reading over the speaker system there at the tiananmen square? Or a TV commentator on CCTV?

It's the male TV commentator on CCTV who mention it.


CHINA unveils ‘Guam Express’ advanced anti-ship missile
(Pinko from KP forum posted this Financial Times article )


Charles Clover in Beijing

Three weeks ahead of President Xi Jinping’s visit to Washington, China unveiled several new anti-ship missiles at a military parade in Beijing, forcibly demonstrating that America’s undisputed maritime power was under threat.

Analysts who had been expecting to catch the first public glimpse of the DF-21D “carrier-killer” missile were not disappointed. The missile — for which there is no reliable defence — has been in development since 2011. Its unveiling on Thursday ended weeks of suspense among the global army of specialists who track Beijing’s defence technology breakthroughs.

For all that, however, the missile itself was not seen. Just a launch tube on a motorised carriage with “DF-21D” stencilled on the side was displayed. The main objective of including it in the parade appeared to be symbolic.
Experts were more excited by an offhand comment by the parade announcer, who said that an even more advanced anti-ship missile was already in deployment.

The DF-26 missile, an advanced intermediate-range ballistic missile with a range of 3,000km to 4,000km, had already been fitted with an anti-ship warhead, according to the parade announcer.

“While an ASBM [Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile] version of the DF-26 was predictable, that it is already a deployed system is quite a shock,” said Rick Fisher, Senior Fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Washington.

The announcer also said the DF-26 was capable of targeting “medium-size ships”, meaning that both US aircraft carriers and their escorting destroyers would be vulnerable.

The longer range of the DF-26 — the DF-21D can only reach 1,500km — means it is capable of reaching the so-called “second island chain” in the western Pacific Ocean, all the way to the US base on Guam.
“A Chinese ability to attack reinforcing US naval forces with precision strikes out to Guam clearly undermines US security guarantees in our multiple Asian alliances, and our implicit security guarantees to Taiwan,” said Mr Fisher.

Patriotic Chinese took to Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, to boast about the weaponry on display, calling the DF-26 “the Guam Express”.

Some analysts say such missiles threaten to consign aircraft carriers — which form the basis of US naval strategy — to the dustbin

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

kroko

Senior Member
Some analysts say such missiles threaten to consign aircraft carriers — which form the basis of US naval strategy — to the dustbin

Well, not enough to being able to hit a ship 1500km away, now china has a missile capable of hitting a ship 4000km away. No one has ever developed somwthing like that, AFAIK.

How knowledgeable are the CCTV commentators? I remember someone saying here that they get some of their PLA information from internet gossip.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Well, not enough to being able to hit a ship 1500km away, now china has a missile capable of hitting a ship 4000km away. No one has ever developed somwthing like that, AFAIK.

How knowledgeable are the CCTV commentators? I remember someone saying here that they get some of their PLA information from internet gossip.

The reliability of CCTV reports on PLA matters varies greatly, just as PLA commentators on CCTV on their own military varies greatly.
Sometimes they bring out unique kernels of new and reliable information, sometimes they directly and blindly report off foreign media, sometimes they have official representatives spout BS, sometimes they will discuss internet speculation (though usually acknowledging it as speculation rather than fact).

Determining their reliability generally depends on what they are saying, when they are saying it, and who is saying it.

In this case, for such an important event I think the chances of their information being drastically incorrect is unlikely. The claims themselves of DF-26 being an AShBM is also not entirely unexpected (it is only a bit earlier than expected). And of course DF-26's range was speculated years ago to be 3000-4000km as well, so no big surprises there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top