Miscellaneous News

Blackstone

Brigadier
A story on Communist Party cracking down on democracy activists. I'll bet dollars to donuts the article is censored in China. On the other hand, Red Dynasty Mandarins might want to scare people by publicly persecuting democracy agitators.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BEIJING - China has put two veteran democracy activists on trial for "subversion of state power", one of their lawyers said Wednesday, the latest prosecution in a sweeping crackdown on civil society.

1264376.jpg

China has put two veteran democracy activists on trial for "subversion of state power", one of their lawyers says, the latest prosecution in a sweeping crackdown on civil society

Chen Shuping and Lu Gengsong face maximum sentences of life in prison after their trial which Chen's attorney Fu Yonggang said took place in the city of Hangzhou on Tuesday.

Both pleaded not guilty to the charges, which were based on their membership of the banned China Democracy Party, which calls for political reform, he added.

"The prosecution had insufficient evidence showing they broke the law," Fu told AFP. Referring to the defendants, he said, "they just want to work to improve the lives of ordinary people and the state of the country".

About a dozen supporters of the two men were barred from entering the court and instead gathered outside behind police cordons, Radio Free Asia reported.

Chen was previously jailed in 2007 for four years for "inciting state subversion," based on articles he had written on overseas websites criticising the government and advocating democracy.

Lu was sentenced to four years for the same crime in 2008.

China's ruling Communist Party under President Xi Jinping has in recent years tightened a crackdown on intellectuals, lawyers and activists critical of the government, with scores detained and dozens jailed.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
A story on Communist Party cracking down on democracy activists. I'll bet dollars to donuts the article is censored in China. On the other hand, Red Dynasty Mandarins might want to scare people by publicly persecuting democracy agitators.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Coming from a guy who relish Christian Science Monitor news.o_O
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
There's the problem: Christian Science Monitor.
Yeah I know, the name gives the wrong impression, but Christian Science Monitor is actually a good publication in the old style, meaning news reporting is usually straightforward, and the editorials generally stay on the Opinion Pages.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
I was rather thinking in terms of credibility versus sensationalism like Fox and CSM news. Heck I rather trust CCTV news over them any day.
I like CCTV too, but only because the channel provides news and stories generally not available in the lame stream media. But, just like all other national news organizations, it has an agenda too, and reading between the lines is required.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
it has an agenda too, and reading between the lines is required.
And Christian Science Monitor news doesn't? Just because China will NEVER become a majority Christian base authority like they wanted it doesn't mean they have the moral right to bash it anyway they want without consequence or return fire from anyone outside their robotic belief system.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
And Christian Science Monitor news doesn't? Just because China will NEVER become a majority Christian base authority like they wanted it doesn't mean they have the moral right to bash it anyway they want without consequence or return fire from anyone outside their robotic belief system.
Dude, check out the CSM, if it was at the start "Christian," it no longer is. I put it in the same category as the Wall Street Journal, except it doesn't cover economics and financial news as much.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Yeah I know, the name gives the wrong impression, but Christian Science Monitor is actually a good publication in the old style, meaning news reporting is usually straightforward, and the editorials generally stay on the Opinion Pages.
No it does not. No serious academia and historians would be caught dead reading their rant. Sorry, but I like to go by a more relevant base news source than some religious fanatics point of view.
 
Top