I can talk past you too same as how you have been avoiding having an actual discussion and justing repeating your points, making presumptuous accusations, and talking past me.
You have been saying that even after adults have been found to be criminals they should still be kept together with the unrelated children they showed up with, no exceptions. Now you are saying in addition to that, thereby providing opportunities for established criminals to prey on children instead of pre-empting them, the target country also has to be an omniscient and omnipotent Big Brother in order to intervene just in time.
What kind of logic is that?
You have never addressed the conundrum of how the immigrants are fleeing such inept, hostile, and corrupt environments yet the target country has to rely on these inept, hostile, and corrupt environments to verify their stories. Not to mention the conflict of interest in how some of these inept, hostile, and corrupt environments can benefit from successful emigration to the US.
As to whether Canada is handling "a lot" of "asylum seekers" (fleeing domestic violence requires specifically migrating to North America) well, see how it goes when a dozen million illegal immigrants have been operating in the country for decades and hundreds of thousands more come every year. Established criminals can easily hide their crimes against children rather than be noticed, forget about being dealt with, especially if the authorities aren't actually an omniscient and omnipotent Big Brother and only has shoddy means of verification.
