Breaking news!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Engineer

Major
These rioters don't have a political agenda. Helped by poverty, unemployment , undereducated and boredom, they only care about themselves and what they want.

So? A riot is a riot. Having political agenda only makes them more guilty, and it doesn't lessen Western media's double standard.
 
Last edited:

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
So? A riot is a riot. Having political agenda only makes them more guilty, and it doesn't lessen Western media's double standard.
bollocks.

Come on now bladerunner, you know we don't allow one liners, as much as I do like to say the word "bollocks"
-Finn
 
Last edited:

Finn McCool

Captain
Registered Member
Political agenda + violence = terrorism.

Political agenda + deliberate violence against civilians = terrorism.

So if people want to justify this rioting on the grounds of politics, they should realize they are defining the riots as terrorism rather than mere criminality.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
These rioters don't have a political agenda. Helped by poverty, unemployment , undereducated and boredom, they only care about themselves and what they want.

Well the rioters just seem like a bunch of thieving criminals to me.

I agree with these post. There was a peaceful protest..then the trouble makers showed up to create chaos. And that they did. Horrible situation.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Political agenda + deliberate violence against civilians = terrorism.

So if people want to justify this rioting on the grounds of politics, they should realize they are defining the riots as terrorism rather than mere criminality.

Well that definition changed during the Iraq War. Plus your definition still applies to the riots in Tibet and Xinjiang.
 

Red___Sword

Junior Member
I agree with these post. There was a peaceful protest..then the trouble makers showed up to create chaos. And that they did. Horrible situation.

I agree this one, that this time, those rioters are not that "innocent".

The underlying arguments on this GOOD SDF, I think, is that good members while not deliberately bashing UK and its govt, they having disgusting feelings that this time, the typical western public media is rapid to recognize the rioters are not "peaceful protesters" - and the same buch of media lords which I would like to call, are not bothering mention it, if anything exactly the same context, happens in China (or any "not-the-same-line" country with west, of the world).

I would like to provide a chance to breack this lockdown of current thread - the PLAN CV set sail today.

By "today", I mean August 10, 2011, Beijing Time.

(though you may having "live presentation" already, it's still good chance to get away from some arguments which SDF didn't get paid to do it)
 
Last edited:

Quickie

Colonel
Tell this to the Western media. Back in 2008 in Tibet and 2009 in Xinjiang, the situation was worse than this. Innocent people were being hacked to death by mobs. Yet, the riots were referred to as peaceful protests. When the PAP were sent to stop the riots, it was police brutality.

There was even a picture of 2 injured and bloodied Han Chinese women with the caption "Blood in their hands". Now I want to see what would be the reaction of the people in this side of the world, if the Chinese media were to do something the same.
 
Last edited:

usaf0314

Junior Member
There was even a picture of 2 injured and bloodied Han Chinese women with the caption "Blood in their hands". Now I want to see what would be the reaction of the people in this side of world, if the Chinese media were to do something the same.

IF... i dont think China will ever do something like that... its too low for them
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top