Best trained infantries (Top 5-10)

Liberator

Junior Member
Okay, Canada is an pacific country, we don't have a lot of men and some of our equipment are old. That's why we had a bad reputation. But canadian force are very well trainened instead, for exemple, we got 19500 regular 16000 reserves in the land force, that's very big... But instead, the Land got a budget of 5,2 billions dollars for 35500 men, we can only spend it in training because we never do R&D and the last equipment we bought was in 2003 with the Stryker MGS and the INFANTRY is our main land force, it has to be very well trained to compensate the lack of armored vehicule,tanks and heavy equipment. We are talking about training here, not army overall in general. Unlike other army were there's some job like AT which is given to some other branches,for exemple we had to destryed them (ennemy tanks) ourself with LAW or M82 Carl Gustav, that's need a lot a cold blood to stay there calmy aiming a tank, the last time we deployed some tank, was 5 Leopard C1 in 1995. Why we are well trained ?? Because we are took the place of the tank (we never use them) and we still got the job of the infantry. We are the backbone and the workhorse of the Canadian Land Force

And China has more training funds than Canada. China's infantries' training you can say that it does not always match Germans. But you can call em #1 on the battlefield.
 

swimmerXC

Unregistered
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Liberator said:
Told you, US spend lots of funds on training, but their troops are just too lazy and does not train as hard. And that is same with some Canadian soldiers from what I have learned from Canadian army shows.

And by the way. North Korean infantries are just way flexible, smarter and stronger than US infantries on battlefields.

yea... US just got the better equipment, if you arm NK with that kind of equipment i wouldn't want to think what would happen to Seoul :eek:
 

rommel

Bow Seat
VIP Professional
Liberator said:
And China has more training funds than Canada. China's infantries' training you can say that it does not always match Germans. But you can call em #1 on the battlefield.

well, China don't have as much training fund for their soldiers per capita, their army is much bigger and they got to pay R&D and new equipment. The other difference between USA and Canada is that Canadians soldiers are all very motivated personnel, we don't have recruiter with quotas to met like in the USA, we are all volunteers.
 
Last edited:

Liberator

Junior Member
well, China don't have as much training fund for their soldiers per capita, their army is much bigger and they got to pay R&D and new equipment. The other difference between USA and Canada is that Canadians soldiers are all very motivated personnel, we don't have recruiter with quotas to met like in the USA, we are all volunteers.

But Chinese soldiers train way much harder, makes them more experienced.
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
1979? 1980's sea conflicts with vietnam?not 40 years ago. this is training. just because U.s has fought pushover enemies for the last 15 years(iraq, somalia, cosovo, afgan) dosn't mean they are experienced. they werent even wars. more like peace missions. they had all of that experience from gulf war one and somalia, and they are still taking casualties and other losses in iraq. just cause some Us soldiers went to iraq and fought dosn't mean all soldiers all of a sudden become more experienced and trained. china has been studying the U.s's tactics and mistakes and learning from them. the us makes its trainig sound tough, but its nothing compared to china.
 

ger_mark

Junior Member
did you or anyone of ur relatives serve chinese military service in last decades?
i guess ur family lives in usa or canada
so i cant understand how you can be so convinced about chinese training
 
Top