Australian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SamuraiBlue

Captain
how have you been, SamuraiBlue?
Future Submarines contract losers Japan, Germany, baffled by French company DCNS win

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

An article by a newspaper company located in SA?
Not really. They share the same interest as ASC.
The part I find most perplexing is DCNS chief executive Sean Costello's comment.

Our offer does not propose nuclear propulsion for Australia at any time but the performance of the submarine we offer does inherit the technology of nuclear submarines,

I wonder if he even understands what he is saying, basically a nuclear powered sub and a conventional diesel powered sub has complete different energy envelopes so if you try to adopt various technology from a nuclear powered sub it would drain a diesel electric sub dry like the pump jet technology which I had questioned here and other forums coming to the same conclusion.
Pump jets are quiet when the screw is spinning at high speed but it has very little effect during low speed but requires more energy since the screw diameter would be smaller then conventional open screws. This is troublesome for a diesel electric powered sub since they are energy strapped forcing the sub to snorkel more often which completely compromise the stealth element completely defeating the reason in equipping a pump jet bell in the first place.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The Royal Australian Navy recently shared photos of an ‘Anzac taskforce’ exercising off the coast of Queensland, Australia.

RNZN’s frigate Te Kaha spent the past week working with an Australian Naval taskforce in preparation for exercise RIMPAC, the world’s largest maritime exercise.

The Anzac taskforce has consisted of HMNZS Te Kaha, HMAS Canberra, HMAS Success and HMAS Ballarat.

Anzac task force ships also conducted advanced Officer of the watch manoeuvres which involved all the ships manoeuvring in close proximity to one another and made for some impressive sights!

HMNZS Te Kaha also used this opportunity to test its Seasprite helicopter, recently bought from RAN, during a cross deck with HMAS Canberra.

The ships subsequently returned to Cairns, Australia to rest before heading to Hawaii.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

ANZAC.jpg
 

Brumby

Major
I wonder if he even understands what he is saying, basically a nuclear powered sub and a conventional diesel powered sub has complete different energy envelopes so if you try to adopt various technology from a nuclear powered sub it would drain a diesel electric sub dry like the pump jet technology which I had questioned here and other forums coming to the same conclusion.
Pump jets are quiet when the screw is spinning at high speed but it has very little effect during low speed but requires more energy since the screw diameter would be smaller then conventional open screws. This is troublesome for a diesel electric powered sub since they are energy strapped forcing the sub to snorkel more often which completely compromise the stealth element completely defeating the reason in equipping a pump jet bell in the first place.

Your point is obviously quite valid. How this problem is meant to be reconciled is something we all would like to know but is likely classified. Either there is a good rationale to it or Australia is truly screwed. I would like to believe at this stage in the former.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
An article by a newspaper company located in SA?
Not really. They share the same interest as ASC.
The part I find most perplexing is DCNS chief executive Sean Costello's comment.



I wonder if he even understands what he is saying, basically a nuclear powered sub and a conventional diesel powered sub has complete different energy envelopes so if you try to adopt various technology from a nuclear powered sub it would drain a diesel electric sub dry like the pump jet technology which I had questioned here and other forums coming to the same conclusion.
Pump jets are quiet when the screw is spinning at high speed but it has very little effect during low speed but requires more energy since the screw diameter would be smaller then conventional open screws. This is troublesome for a diesel electric powered sub since they are energy strapped forcing the sub to snorkel more often which completely compromise the stealth element completely defeating the reason in equipping a pump jet bell in the first place.

a lost is a lost ... just move on ... no Ifs or Buts :p
 

SouthernSky

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) should have pushed harder to market its defense technology to win a $40 billion submarine sale to Australia, and is open to partnerships with U.S. defense companies, Chief Executive Shunichi Miyanaga said on Friday

In the submarine contest, "we were a little bit not aggressive in explaining our advantages because we felt it was kind of a defense secret," Miyanaga said, noting Japan continues to see the possibility of exporting defense systems.

"We will have to change our approach. In this kind of market we need to be more clear and persuasive," he said, adding: "We would like to pursue more opportunities with American partners."

France in April won the Australian submarine contract, a come-from-behind victory on one of the world's most lucrative defense deals, leaving Tokyo's dream of fast-tracking a revival of its arms export industry in disarray

It is no doubt a steep learning curve for Japanese companies wishing to pursue export opportunities in the defence sector. Good to see MHI heeding this early lesson.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Australian Army is under a restructuring program known as Plan Beersheba
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

the Army's three regular force combat
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) will be restructured into multi-role formations with a similar structure;
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
before this time the brigades were structured as mechanised, light infantry and motorised infantry formations respectively
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Main difference with previous organization for Combined arms Brigades :

One armoured cavalry regiment (each equipped with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
light armoured vehicles, and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
armoured personnel carriers
For vehicles about 14 of each types.

Before and for me always 1st Armoured Rgt /1st Brigade have 2 Sqns with 14 M1A1 maybe some in HQ ?

2nd Cav Rgt/3th Brigade have do transition i have see a video
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


2/14 Light Horse Rgt/7th Brigade as 1st Armoured Rgt do transition very soon

In fact before few M1A1 are in combat units max 30 on a total of 59 now 42 more logic.

Some changes few for Reserves Brigades especialy 120 mm mortars replace L-119, 105 mm guns in Art Bat.

Good Army for quality, but for size a little short the 3 Combined arms Brigades have 3500/3800 pers with presumably only 3 Inf Combat Companies in Inf Bat and only 2 Batteries by Art Rgt, a 4th and 3th unit would be really better for get Brigades more capable with around 4500 pers.

If some have more infos ;)
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
HMAS Adelaide has completed Exercise Sea Explorer off the North Queensland coast, continuing her integration into the Amphibious Ready Element.

Adelaide embarked an additional 800 personnel at the beginning of the exercise, including Townsville-based 2nd Battalion, the Royal Australian Regiment and Royal Australian Air Force elements.

The ship conducted a range of training exercises to test her ability to support the embarked elements.

Commander of the Amphibious Task Group, Captain Brett Sonter, said Adelaide had undertaken a number of concurrent activities as part of Sea Explorer.

“As part of the exercise, the ship is being assessed against operational capability requirements,” Captain Sonter said.

The Amphibious Beach Team from Army’s 10 Force Support Battalion disembarked Adelaide via amphibious vehicles, descending onto Cowley Beach to prepare it for the impending wave of personnel and equipment.

Team Commander, Army Lieutenant Monica Merlo, said her team were the link between the ship and shore.

“We are responsible for coordinating the movement of all stores and vehicles from Adelaide to the beach, and then onto the next objective,” Lieutenant Merlo said.

“We do this by using two different types of small boats, as well as the LARCs, an amphibious vehicle, to transfer cargo to the shore. After we have set up, we expect around 500 military personnel and 37 vehicles across Cowley beach to conduct their training.”

Air Force personnel on Adelaide provided air traffic control to the embarked MRH-90 helicopters, which transported Ground Combat Element personnel from the ship to the beach.

Soldiers from 2nd Cavalry Regiment practiced driving light armored vehicles from Adelaide’s landing craft onto Cowley beach, and then reversing back on.

The final exercise in SEA EXPLORER was for Adelaide and her embarked forces to perform a non-combatant evacuation.

One hundred and sixty role players descended on Cowley beach for Exercise Cowley Assist in preparation for their rescue from a simulated disaster.

The Sea Series of exercises will culminate with Exercise Sea Raider later in 2016.

Sea Raider will evaluate if Adelaide and her sister ship, HMAS Canberra, are prepared as an integral part of Australia’s amphibious capability.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

AUS.jpg
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
How do you separate men from boys in the Australian Navy?

With a crowbar. Literally.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Australian navy recruits were subjected to horrific abuse as a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
including being forced to rape each other and to undergo violent initiation rituals which left some teenage cadets unconscious, a royal commission into child sex abuse has heard.

Former navy personnel outlined decades of disturbing abuse and cover-ups, including practices such as “blackballing”, which involved their genitals being smeared with shoe polish, or a “royal flush”, which involved flushing people’s heads in a toilet after it had been used. Victims who complained were told to “suck it up … it will make a man of you".

The commission heard from a former navy member who said he was often “snatched” in the middle of the night and dragged to a sports oval, where he was subject to repeated sexual abuse and rape involving other recruits.

Graeme Frazer, a former recruit who joined the navy as a 16-year-old, told the commission he was left unconscious after being forced to run down a corridor called the "gauntlet" while being hit with sacks filled with irons, boots and other items.

He said he was told the abuse was a “rite of passage in the real navy,” adding that the commission was "a symbolic day that marks the end of 49 years of torment".

The commission heard that a 30-year-old instructor had a sexual relationship with Eleanore Tibble, a 15-year-old cadet, who was then threatened with a dishonourable discharge for “fraternisation”. She took her own life in 2000 at age 16.

The commission was launched in 2012 and has heard horrific accounts of abuse across the country at religious institutions, schools, children’s homes, sporting and community organisations and charities such as the Salvation Army.

Hearings this week began focusing on the Australian military and will investigate the existing cadets program, which has about 25,000 active members.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top