Australian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Status
Not open for further replies.
the most recent on the submarines: "France, Germany and Japan will be invited to participate in this competitive evaluation process" etc.:
Minister for Defence – Strategic direction of the Future Submarine Program
20 February 2015

Today the Government announces the acquisition strategy for the Future Submarine Program. This announcement sets out further details of the competitive evaluation process that will be undertaken by the Department of Defence.

Submarines are an essential component of Australia’s naval capability and the Government will ensure that the future submarine provides the best possible capability and value for money for Australian taxpayers while maximising the involvement of Australian industry.

Submarines are the most complex, sensitive and expensive Defence capability acquisition a Government can make.

Australia’s national security and $1.6 trillion economy depend on secure sea lanes. We need the best possible submarine to protect our trade and support our maritime security.

It must be delivered in time to avoid a capability gap in the mid-2020s when the Collins Class submarine is scheduled to be retired from service. The decisions we make on the Future Submarine Program will determine what kind of capability we have to defend Australia and Australian interests into the 2040s and beyond.

The process outlined by the Government today provides a pathway for Australian industry to maximise its involvement in the program, whilst not compromising capability, cost, program schedule or risk.

The Government expects that significant work will be undertaken in Australia during the build phase of the future submarine including combat system integration, design assurance and land based testing. This will result in the creation at least 500 new high-skill jobs in Australia, the majority of which will be based in South Australia.

The Future Submarine Program is the largest Defence procurement program in Australia’s history and represents an investment in the order of $50 billion in Australia’s security. These costs will be subject to refinement through the competitive evaluation process. A significant proportion of this investment will be spent in Australia during the lifetime of the future submarine.

Successive governments have used various kinds of competitive evaluation processes for major Defence capability procurements.

As part of this competitive evaluation process, the Department of Defence will seek proposals from potential partners for:

a) Pre-concept designs based on meeting Australian capability criteria;

b) Options for design and build overseas, in Australia, and/or a hybrid approach;

c) Rough order of magnitude (ROM) costs and schedule for each option; and

d) Positions on key commercial issues, for example intellectual property rights and the ability to use and disclose technical data.

In addition to this – and on the advice of Defence – the Government has endorsed a set of key strategic requirements for our future submarines:

a) Range and endurance similar to the Collins Class submarine;

b) Sensor performance and stealth characteristics that are superior to the Collins Class submarine; and

c) The combat system and heavyweight torpedo jointly developed between the United States and Australia as the preferred combat system and main armament.

Defence advises that for Australian industry to have the best opportunity to maximise their involvement in the Future Submarine Program, it needs to work with an international partner.

Based on work completed by Defence, France, Germany, and Japan have emerged as potential international partners. All three countries have proven submarine design and build capabilities and are currently producing submarines.

France, Germany and Japan will be invited to participate in this competitive evaluation process that will assess their ability to partner with Australia to develop a Future Submarine that meets our capability requirements.

The Department of Defence will invite potential international partners to seek opportunities for Australian industry participation in the Future Submarine Program.

The competitive evaluation process will help the Government balance important considerations including capability, cost, schedule, and risk. Interoperability with our alliance partner, the United States, will also be a fundamental consideration.

The competitive evaluation process will take around ten months, after which an international partner will be selected for Australia’s Future Submarine Program. Further details about Australian industry involvement are also expected to be known at that point.

The competitive evaluation process will ensure that capability, cost, schedule, and key strategic considerations, along with Australian industry involvement, are carefully and methodically considered, and avoid unnecessary delays to the Future Submarine Program.

The Department of Defence will soon be holding industry briefings to inform Australian industry about the process and how they can engage with potential international partners.

An expert advisory panel will also be appointed to oversee the competitive evaluation process. Further details about this will be announced once individual appointments are confirmed.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Brumby

Major
the most recent on the submarines: "France, Germany and Japan will be invited to participate in this competitive evaluation process" etc.:

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Based on this announcement, we get a good sense of directionally where this thing is heading including :
1)The field is narrowed down to three with Sweden excluded
2)Requirements of mandatory localization are limited to combat systems integration, land testing and quality control. That means steel cutting, fabrication and assembly is open for consideration.
3)Some kind of hybrid arrangement with an international partner will be the structure go with
4)How well the design will integrate primarily with US systems will be important, implicitly US preference will have an influence on final choice .
4)A 10 month evaluation process

It looks to me the number to acquire is still open but with a cost cap of $50 billion overall.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I think this will be an acceptable process.

I also believe, based on the criteria named in this release, and the existing history, that a modification of the Japanese Soryu is clearly the front runner, and almost a lock for the contract.

I believe it is theirs to win based on this announcement.

I also believe that the Soryu design, of those listed, is by far and away the best solution for Australia's needs.

We should know in ten months to a year.
 
Australian Reapers?
RAAF commences Reaper training
A detachment of RAAF personnel has commenced training on the General Atomics MQ-9B Reaper unmanned system at two US bases.

Although not yet formally announced as an ADF requirement of project, six RAAF personnel are training on the system at Holloman AFB in New Mexico and Creech AFB near Las Vegas.

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Defence, Darren Chester, announced the training detachment at the Chief of Air Force’s Symposium in Melbourne yesterday. “Unmanned aerial systems are an advancing technology with a proven record of providing ‘eyes in the sky’ in the Middle East region,” Mr Chester said.

“It would be remiss of Australia not to continue to develop our knowledge of this technology to ensure we are able to gain the greatest benefit from unmanned aerial systems and the best protection for our troops on future operations.”

Yet to be announced but strongly rumoured to be under serious consideration by this year’s Force Structure Review and Defence White Paper (FSR/DWP) is the nascent Project AIR 7100 which will see an unknown number of medium altitude long endurance (MALE) unmanned aircraft and ground control systems in the Predator/Reaper class acquired.

Interest in such a capability was first flagged by the Chief of Capability Defence Group, LTGEN John Caligari at a Williams Foundation seminar in 2013, but no Defence Capability Plan (DCP) has been published since then.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Silvestre

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The regular Army is targeted to expand to 31,000 personnel by 2014–15.

Total it will been 61500 with Royal Air Force and the Navy. 14500 in the Navy and 15000 personnal in Royal Air Force.

This strength will continue to over 2030 and has been active reserves outside the country in war. First strenght at home land.

16000 personnal in Royal Air Force so strenght are 61500 in Professional Army of Australian Armed Forces. 2015 until over 2030 this 1st of sizes. I've wrong with 15000 it's insted 16000 in Royal Air Force.

14500 seeman and marines in the Navy.

Top-15 richest defence budjet by Australian armies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The regular Army is targeted to expand to 31,000 personnel by 2014–15.

...ta da, ta da, ta da....

Silvestre, please DO NOT USE Wikipedia as a source for news.

It is open to anyone who wants to post information there and while a good starting point for very basic information, it is not a reliable news source like we are seeking here on SD.

Take time to do more research an become aware of some of the credible news sources out there for defense related matters.

We are very glad you are here...but please spend more time learning from other members and contributing news and info from sources that represent true news.

Thanks.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



LH02-URE-01.jpg

Naval Today said:
Australian Navy vessels recently completed Unit Readiness Evaluation (URE) off the New South Wales coast.

During the URE, HMAS Melbourne (05) HMAS Gascoyne (M85) and HMAS Canberra (L02) completed a range of training evaluations across the spectrum of mariner skills which included ships safety, departmental operations, warfare, damage control and flying operations.

After completing the exercises the vessels returned to Sydney Harbour, with HMAS Gascoyne leading the way.

More pictures:


LH02-URE-02.jpg

LH02-URE-03.jpg

Seems like just yesterday that the Canberra was launched. Now she's getting all worked up for deployment! And her sister will be right behind her and then the Hobart DDGs will follow.

Boy would I love to see six F-35Bs on that deck!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top