Aircraft Carriers III

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
The JMSDF is almost as tight as the PLAN Type 071 and LCAC

Why are they running those LHD with empty decks ? What are they carrying fresh air ?

That deck sure look better with helicopter packed out
Strictly speaking they aren't LHDs as they have no Dock, that's what the D stands for. You could class then as LPHs (Landing Platform, Helicopter), but that still has an amphibious assault connotation. They are classed as DDHs (Helicopter carrying Destroyers) by the Japanese, but that is a political designation to pull the wool over ignorant politicians. They are light STOVL Carriers (CVL), plain and simple.
 

cockneyjock1974

New Member
Registered Member
Bingo

It has been confirmed that HMS Queen Elizabeth is currently having rectification and repair work done after a propeller issue was identified in sea trials.

Multiple sources, some on board the vessel, have told the UK Defence Journal that an issue has been identified with the prop shaft, specifically the part of the frame holding the prop in place is 12mm out of alignment, causing the prop to be slightly at an angle leading to ‘cavitation, excess noise and drag’.

It’s possible that this may have been caused by debris as earlier in the month as HMS Queen Elizabeth picked up an item of debris around one of her propeller shafts earlier in the month.

The Aircraft Carrier Alliance confirmed at the time that divers had been investigating the debris around one of the propeller shafts:

“HMS Queen Elizabeth is making progress through her sea trials programme, which is designed to test the full spectrum of her systems. The ship is performing well, however an item of debris was caught around one of the propeller shafts. This was subsequently cleared and an investigation has been undertaken.”

HMS Queen Elizabeth visited Invergordon for a planned stop to re-fuel and store the ship however she has been alongside longer than planned. We understand that the opportunity has been taken to undertake some engineering work, but sources close to the programme assure us that “this is very much in hand and, whilst I’m aware of the speculation, we expect this to be routinely undertaken and for sea trials to continue successfully.”

Earlier in the week a crew member told us that “On the 24th of this month we are going back to dry dock as on the props need to completely stripped apart”, he did add however that this was only a rumour and may not be the case.

We reached out to the ACA for comment who responded by suggesting that this isn’t out of the ordinary:

“HMS Queen Elizabeth is making progress through the sea trials programme, designed to test the full spectrum of her vast and complex systems.

We fully anticipate this will identify areas for improvement that will be addressed at sea, during routine port stops or as part of the planned engineering period.”

Sea trials monitor speed, manoeuvrability, power and propulsion as well as undertaking weapons trials and additional tests on her levels of readiness.

Following this initial period, HMS Queen Elizabeth will return to Rosyth for further testing and maintenance before heading back to sea for a second stage which aims to test her Mission Systems. She will transit to her home port of Portsmouth Naval Base to be handed over to the Royal Navy later this year.

It should be noted that the point of sea trials is to find issues and rectify them. Things will go wrong as the vessel is essentially a giant prototype and while this isn’t one of those ‘things going wrong’, we remain confident that she’ll pass her trials with flying colours.

It remains to be seen what the true cause of this issue is however, it doesn’t appear to be a major issue.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
POW is in NO.1 dock Rosyth, all 15 dry docks at Portsmouth are too small, H&W dry docks are full of oil rigs. King George V dock in Southampton doesn't have a working gate and our arrangement with the French is invalid because Charlie is in refit there.
now found this:
The dry dock conundrum
These events do raise an interesting question. In future where will the QE carriers be dry-docked and, if HMS Queen Elizabeth had required urgent docking, what are the options? Unfortunately Portsmouth Naval Base does not have a dry dock large enough for the QE carriers. HMS Prince of Wales currently under construction occupies the dry dock in Rosyth. As
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
demonstrated, moving in or out of the dock in Rosyth is a very complex process, requiring 11 tugs and can only be done within certain tidal and weather windows. The King George V graving dock in Southampton, which would be convenient for a Portsmouth-based ship, has been closed since 2005. The Harland and Wolf dry dock in Belfast is currently involved in wind farm construction and would require some time to be prepared. No 5 Dock at on Merseyside, or Incgreen Dry Dock, Port Glasgow (both owned by Cammel Laird) are just large enough for the ship. In these cases, it is unclear if there would be appropriate personnel and facilities available to support work on QE. The nearest foreign option would be in Rotterdam but relying on overseas facilities is likely to be highly controversial. The expansion of D-Lock at Portsmouth would probably be the ideal long term solution but the funds for this are likely to be hard to find. Expect to see the QE carriers reliant on Roysth when needing to go into dry dock in the long term.
inside
HMS Queen Elizabeth’s extended stop at Invergordon explained
July 19, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(by the way I think HMS Queen Elizabeth’s extended stop at Invergordon IS NOT explained in that blog post)
 
DFGKWfTXgAImAl2.jpg

from the official Twitter account
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

... looks like a Politically Correct ship
 
Top