Nice photos there Escobar. Is it me or do those PLA soldiers do wear their LCE (Load Carrying Equipment) pretty tight?
This is a discussion on PLA Photos within the World Military Pictures forums, part of the World Strategic Defence Area category; DH-10...
DH-10
![]()
Nice photos there Escobar. Is it me or do those PLA soldiers do wear their LCE (Load Carrying Equipment) pretty tight?
ZBD03 Airborne Infantry Fighting Vehicle
![]()
escobar, I don't know where you get all the PLA photos but keep them coming at your will!
OUTSTANDING PHOTOS!!
Be sure to check out...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
don't forget
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
am what I am.... 'Dat's all what I am"
I noticed there are no treads on it, must be getting maintenance done or a simple oil change.
It's cheap, effective and plentiful.
Remember that the PLA amphibious and airborne divisions are primarily tasked with a Taiwan scenario. Considering that Taiwan is still using M60s as their MBT, even HJ73s are more than capable of taking them out. Besides, I don't really think Chinese IFVs carry HJ73s primarily for anti-tank duty, the PLA have their own WZ550 dedicated HJ8/9 carriers for that, as well as HJ8/9 launchers mounted on a vast variety of vehicles, ranging from light buggies to jeeps and hummers.
The small size of the HJ73 also means IFVs can carry far more of them than something like a HJ8/9, and I think the PLA uses them more as a general purpose missile to augment the firepower from the autocannon. That is something that a HJ8 or 9 would be a massive overkill/waste for, and if I was an American taxpayer, I would much rather that they had something similar instead of wasting hugely expensive Javelin missiles on bunkers or buildings.
Ha. But didn't GI Joes uses AT4 as standard RPG for foot soldier, and Tows as vehicle mounting general purpose ATGM? Quite cheap and plenty in American's standard.
I think another reason for PLA airborne IFVs carrying HJ73 level of ATGMs is because it's light weight, on top of "easy to configure" - You never saw HJ9 piggybacked on anything right? It (HJ8/9) needs dedicated firing platform.
ZTZ99G
ZTZ99A2 MBT model
![]()
If my memory serves me correctly, type 99 still doesn't have automatic gearboxes and still have primitive power delivery system.
ZBD08 Infantry Fighting Vehicle
![]()
ZBL09 (VN1 Export) 8x8 AFV
Special variant
![]()
According to people from inner circle, this is evidence that new type of PLA general purpose chasis brings spring mattress to some remote area where PLA SOFs are camped.
If you ask me, I'd not tell you that is a LARGE, armord amphibian popcorn maker, I am not a leaker.
very funny jokes Red Swordso you have to poke me about the SOF thread all the way here, going against the grain is proving highly unpopular no?
i was asking serious question, and hope you can respect the thread, please bring any disagreement to the appropriate thread
Bookmarks