Results 1 to 5 of 5

viability of using the T-AKE-1 design

This is a discussion on viability of using the T-AKE-1 design within the World Armed Forces forums, part of the World Strategic Defence Area category; With all the hate directed to the San Antonio class, I was wondering what any other options the USN had ...

  1. #1
    philbob is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    39

    viability of using the T-AKE-1 design

    With all the hate directed to the San Antonio class, I was wondering what any other options the USN had on a new amphib and honestly the only thing that would come to mind is the Lewis and Clark class ship converted to a amphibious role. Please keep in mind that it is politically impossible to try and purchases a off the shelf foreign design like the Mistral BCP so I would like to keep it on politically possible path.

  2. #2
    bd popeye's Avatar
    bd popeye is offline The Last Jedi
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cedar Rapids Iowa
    Posts
    15,842

    Re: viability of using the T-AKE-1 design

    I don't think this is possible.

    The San Antonio class ships are improving in quality..finally..as they are being commissioned. The USN and the builder Northrup Grumman are working out the bugs and making repairs. I think in the long run the LPD-17 class will perform well.
    Be sure to check out...


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    don't forget


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    am what I am.... 'Dat's all what I am"

  3. #3
    Ambivalent is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Near a military installation
    Posts
    517

    Re: viability of using the T-AKE-1 design

    I don't think you could possibly rearrange the machinery spaces of a T-AKE to accommodate a well deck. One might as well start from scratch with a new design, it would require as much money to do. I agree with Popeye's assessment.
    There is a public law that requires USN combat ships to be built in the US, but we have in the past bought auxilaries abroad, including the very successful Sirius class bought used from the Royal Fleet Auxilary. The USN also bought some heavy salvage tugs from the UK back in the 1970's, later transferred to the Coast Guard. The USN had to bring Austal to the US for them to build LCS-2 and the high speed transport series.

  4. #4
    bd popeye's Avatar
    bd popeye is offline The Last Jedi
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cedar Rapids Iowa
    Posts
    15,842

    Re: viability of using the T-AKE-1 design

    ^^ agreed Ambivilent.. and there's no "quick fix" to the problems other than assest them and repair them as necessary. By the way Northrup Grumman is paying for their goof ups..as well they should.
    Last edited by bd popeye; 01-04-2010 at 07:25 AM.
    Be sure to check out...


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    don't forget


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    am what I am.... 'Dat's all what I am"

  5. #5
    philbob is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    39

    Re: viability of using the T-AKE-1 design

    Quote Originally Posted by bd popeye View Post
    I don't think this is possible.

    The San Antonio class ships are improving in quality..finally..as they are being commissioned. The USN and the builder Northrup Grumman are working out the bugs and making repairs. I think in the long run the LPD-17 class will perform well.

    Oh dont get me wrong i agree and i hope we buy ALOT more of them (ideally to replace the LSD's, LCC/JCC, and a UAS mother ship, and finally some for the Global fleet station) but i noticed a lot of bloggers tend to rant about them but then they offer suggestions like buy the mistral or buy the Dokdo, or the Bay which are not remotely politcally practical. So basicily they are complaining with out offering actual solutions. I didnt think that the well deck was possible but i did think it was possible to ad some davits for new Landing barges that would lower then they would have some side doors/ramps (similar to the side door off the Berthof) also expand the helicopter landing pads forward also and hollow out the lower level of the superstructer making it a through deck hanger.
    Last edited by philbob; 01-03-2010 at 10:32 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. *New J-10 Thread*
    By Deino in forum Air Force
    Replies: 974
    Last Post: 03-16-2007, 11:06 AM
  2. JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 News, Discussion & Media
    By crazyinsane105 in forum Air Force
    Replies: 564
    Last Post: 02-04-2007, 10:23 PM
  3. U.S.built Iranian aircraft
    By DPRKPTboat in forum World Armed Forces
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-13-2006, 05:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13