This is a discussion on France confirms major arms deal with Libya within the World Armed Forces forums, part of the World Strategic Defence Area category; http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070803...celibyaweapons PARIS (AFP) - Libya has reached a major arms deal with the European aerospace giant EADS, the first since ...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070803...celibyaweapons
PARIS (AFP) - Libya has reached a major arms deal with the European aerospace giant EADS, the first since a weapons embargo was lifted on Tripoli in 2004 and a potential source of embarrassment for French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
French Defence Minister Herve Morin confirmed Friday that a letter of intent had been signed for the sale of Milan anti-tank missiles and a radio communications system worth, according to a Libyan official, 296 million euros (405 million dollars).
I find it interesting that Libya is insisting on buying Milan ATGM's that would require EU approval, when they could've easily obtained good ATGM's from Russia? Even after obtaining its independence they still look to former colonial power as preferred source for arms?
Surprise Libya has not bought the Rafale yet. They may be the first foreign customers.
I agree - Libya doesn't need the Rafale.
France is getting so stuffed on export orders. At the rate it's going the only hope would be for Taiwan to not get the F-16 Block 52 deal - there have been rumours that Taiwan and France could sort something out with the Rafale, maybe upgrading the Mirages as well to sweeten the deal.
Last edited by FuManChu; 08-09-2007 at 09:21 AM.
"Japan is as much of a threat to China, as China is to Japan."
--FuManChu
Out of curiosity, why are countries rejecting the Rafale?
Is it just the price or is the aircraft lacking something?
I think it's down to a few things. First, it isn't as cheap as the latest F-16 or something like Grippen. Second, there aren't that many countries that have experience with French weaponary that could afford it - whereas the US has much wider market penetration, as it were. Third, some people don't consider the Rafale the equal of things like the F-35 or Typhoon (a matter of perception, not "truth").
I don't think Rafale is a bad plane at all. Maybe a simpler way of putting it is that it's not cheap enough to appeal to countries who are on a budget but not "classy" or "technologically superior" to justify a purchase by a country with a large budget.
I don't think they're that desperate yet.![]()
"Japan is as much of a threat to China, as China is to Japan."
--FuManChu
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/813144.html
Report: Libya to order 13-18 French Rafale fighter jets in $3.24 b deal
No, I don't believe Libya would spend $3.24 billion on 13-18 aircraft. We're talking about a country with what, $1.x billion annual military budget?
"Japan is as much of a threat to China, as China is to Japan."
--FuManChu
Qaddafi would want more bang for his buck. He'd be better off with getting Mirage 2000s, which would also be less of a pain maintenance wise.
Libya was reported to be negotiating for purchase of 20 MiG-29 SMT and 12 Su-30MK's. However to best of my knowledge the deal is not finalized, and no aircraft has been delivered.
For western aircraft, the cheapest option for Libyan Air Force would be to refurbish its fleet of 22-24 Mirage F-1's, via S. Africa or France (F1-CT). Both S. Africa and France have a supply of F-1's in storage, which could be purchased for replacements or spares.
For eastern aircraft, MiG offers a MiG-23-98 upgrade program for only $1 million USD per plane. Libya has a fleet of 120+ MiG-23's that could be upgraded as an interim solution. There's also various MiG-21 upgrades, Su-22M5, and Su-24M2 upgrades from Russia.
The Libyan AF has too many old aircraft in numbers and variety. If Qaddafi wants to spend the $, he should probably look to consolidate and replace them with fewer but modern multi-mission capable aircraft, more suitable for a nation of its size and budget. Perhaps a fleet of Su-30MKM's will be far cheaper than Rafales?
Bookmarks