It looks like a smaller version of Arleigh. How this baby compared to Chinese 052C+ or British Type 45 DDG ?
5Likes
This is a discussion on Australia's Hobart Class AEGIS DDG within the World Armed Forces forums, part of the World Strategic Defence Area category; This thread is about the Hobart class AEGIS DDG class currently being built by Australia. They are being built to ...
This thread is about the Hobart class AEGIS DDG class currently being built by Australia. They are being built to provide world-class anti-air, ainti-submarine, and anti-surface war capabilities for the RAN, and particularly to escort the Australian Canberra Class LPH vessels also currently underconstruction.
Here are the specs and description of the vessel from my AEGIS Vessels of the World web site:
This thread should be used for all issues regarding the Hobart class. Their construction, outfitting, trials and testing, and their deployment and service as time goes on.Originally Posted by AEGIS VESSELS OF THE WORLD
Their are a lot of RAN fans out their, and the HMAS Hobart is going to be a class of vessels they can be justifiably proud of to go along with their Canberra LPH vessles which might just end up getting fixed-wing Naval Aviation back into use in the RAN.
They will need powerful AAW and mulit-mission combatants to protect them and the Hobart Class (derived from the Spanish Bazan Class - but with more powerful engines, the larger AEGIS, and more displacement) will fit that bill.
Last edited by bd popeye; 07-06-2012 at 09:59 PM. Reason: spelling of title
It looks like a smaller version of Arleigh. How this baby compared to Chinese 052C+ or British Type 45 DDG ?
It's an updated and upgraded Bazan. It uses the same AEGIS radar as the Burke, whereas the Bazan has a little smaller, less capanbile one (1D vs 1F).
It carries 48 VLS cells...but 32 will be filled with SM-2 ER missiles with 150+km range, and the other 16 will have quad packs of Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (meaning 64 medium range ESSMs), so they will carry 96 AAW missiles, and then have the 20mm CIWS...though I would have preferred to see one RAM launcher on there too.
It has increased engine power as well. I think that in terms of its battle management system, which is a proven and thoroughly tested AEGIS system on over 100 vessels world-wide, and in terms of the numbers and coverage (Long Range and Mid Range) missiles it carries...and when you look at its ASW capabilities, that it is pretty much ahead of the Type 052C. Probably equal to (over all)the Type 45s and Horizon vessels, but still a more mature, proven and established battle management and sensor system.
The Aussies will build three of these and still have an option for a fourth I believe.
It sounds very formidable. Quad pack concept is very interesting ... hope China navy adopt that concept and I believe in solid fuel technology, China still somehow behind the USA. It means China will need bigger missile to have the same load or range.
BTW, how much this Hobart Class would cost Australian Govt. I'd imagine would be around $1.5B each
I know forms follow function especially when it comes to warship design BUT I have to say I do not care too much for it's design. I'm sure it's a world class destroyer but the low bridge relative to it's very tall superstructure is not very attractive. To each his own I guess. I'm sure many here find it to be a beautiful design.
Royal Australian Navy Hobart Class destroyers AN/SPY-1D(V) phased array radar arrive in Adelaide
Minister for Defence Materiel Jason Clare announced the arrival in Adelaide of the first two state of the art ‘SPY’ radar array faces that will be installed on the Air Warfare Destroyers (AWDs). “The multi-function SPY radar is capable of search, automatic detection, tracking of air and surface targets and missile engagement support,” Mr Clare said.
“It works to distinguish signals from stationary or moving targets and to identify and reject ‘clutter’ such as clouds and flocks of birds.”
The AN/SPY-1D(V) phased array radar will provide the Hobart Class destroyers with comprehensive surveillance around the ship.
Great news for Australia. Apparently they were tested in the US and qualified and then sent on to Australia. The Hobarts have the AN/SPY-1D(V) which is more capable (and heavier) than the 1F installed on the Bazan class in Spain.
At first I felt exactly the same about the five Spanish Bazan class...but they have grown on me over they years...and particularly after thet were integrated into a US CSG a couple of years ago and performed so ably, I found I liked them more and more. The new Hobarts will be capable of the same (as are all AEGIS vessels) when needed, except with the larger and more capable full 1D(V) version of AEGIS, they will be even more capable.
So much is a piece of this baby ?
Here's a comparison of the Burke and the Bazan from pics looking at it from the stern"
Arleigh Burke
Bazan
Since they are canted, there is not too much difference in terms of obstruction. The Bazan and Hobart do have the arrays sitting higher relatively with the arrays situated something like 1/2 to 3/4s above the stack while the Burke's have the arrays top at the same height as the stack. I believe the Burke's actually may be physycally higher.
And yes, the Akizuki class, with its radars mounted on the deck house at the stern of the vessel, just forward of the helo deck, is probably the best configuration for the arrays themselves in terms of obstruction, because there is a complete unobstructed view from that point, though the arrays are probably not as high there as they are on the higher, main deck housing forward of th other designs.
Last edited by Jeff Head; 07-09-2012 at 07:16 AM.
Bookmarks